Suppr超能文献

握力不对称和握力减弱与美国老年人的功能障碍存在差异相关性。

Handgrip Strength Asymmetry and Weakness are Differentially Associated with Functional Limitations in Older Americans.

机构信息

Department of Health, Nutrition, and Exercise Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA.

Department of Human Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 6;17(9):3231. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093231.

Abstract

Handgrip strength (HGS) is a convent measure of strength capacity and associated with several age-related health conditions such as functional disability. Asymmetric strength between limbs has been linked to diminished function. Therefore, both HGS asymmetry and weakness could be associated with functional disability. We examined the associations of HGS asymmetry and weakness on functional limitations in a nationally representative sample of older Americans. : Data were analyzed from 2689 adults ≥ 60 years who participated in the 2011-2012 and 2013-2014 waves of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Weakness was defined as HGS < 26 kg for men and < 16 kg for women. Asymmetry was determined from the ratio of the dominant and non-dominant HGS. Those with HGS ratio 0.9-1.1 were considered as having HGS symmetry, and those outside this range had asymmetry. Compared to those with symmetric HGS and were not weak, those with weakness alone, and both weakness and HGS asymmetry had 2.47 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-5.35) and 3.93 (CI: 1.18-13.07) greater odds for functional limitations, respectively. However, HGS asymmetry alone was not associated with functional limitations (odds ratio: 0.80; CI: 0.62-1.03). The use of HGS asymmetry in protocols could improve the prognostic value of handgrip dynamometers.

摘要

握力(HGS)是一种力量能力的常规测量方法,与多种与年龄相关的健康状况有关,例如功能障碍。肢体之间的力量不对称与功能减退有关。因此,HGS 不对称和无力都可能与功能障碍有关。我们在一个具有全国代表性的美国老年人样本中检查了 HGS 不对称和无力与功能障碍之间的关联。:对 2689 名≥60 岁的成年人进行了数据分析,这些成年人参加了 2011-2012 年和 2013-2014 年的国家健康和营养检查调查。无力的定义为男性 HGS<26kg,女性 HGS<16kg。不对称性是根据优势手和非优势手的 HGS 比值确定的。那些 HGS 比值为 0.9-1.1 的人被认为具有 HGS 对称性,而那些不在此范围内的人则具有不对称性。与具有对称性 HGS 且不虚弱的人相比,仅虚弱的人、既虚弱又 HGS 不对称的人发生功能障碍的几率分别高出 2.47(95%置信区间 [CI]:1.14-5.35)和 3.93(CI:1.18-13.07)。然而,HGS 不对称本身与功能障碍无关(优势比:0.80;CI:0.62-1.03)。在方案中使用 HGS 不对称性可以提高握力计的预后价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc0/7246814/7669a28690bb/ijerph-17-03231-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验