Golden Jubilee Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Department of Orthopedic, Buddhachinraj Hospital, Phitsanulok, Thailand.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jun 22;19(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04842-5.
Basicervical femoral neck fracture is a rare proximal femur fracture with a high implant failure rate. Biomechanical comparisons between cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) and dynamic hip screws (DHSs) under torsion loading are lacking. This study compared the biomechanical performance of three fixations for basicervical femoral neck fractures under torsion load during early ambulation.
The biomechanical study models used three fixations: a DHS, a DHS with an anti-rotation screw, and a short CMN. Finite element analysis was used to simulate hip rotation with muscle forces related to leg swing applied to the femur. The equivalent von Mises stress (EQV) on fixation, fragment displacement, and strain energy density at the proximal cancellous bone were monitored for fixation stability.
The EQV of the short CMN construct (304.63 MPa) was comparable to that of the titanium DHS construct (293.39 MPa) and greater than that of the titanium DHS with an anti-rotation screw construct (200.94 MPa). The proximal fragment displacement in the short CMN construct was approximately 0.13 mm, the greatest among the constructs. The risk of screw cutout for the lag screw in short CMNs was 3.1-5.8 times greater than that for DHSs and DHSs with anti-rotation screw constructs.
Titanium DHS combined with an anti-rotation screw provided lower fragment displacement, stress, and strain energy density in the femoral head than the other fixations under torsion load. Basicervical femoral neck fracture treated with CMNs may increase the risk of lag screw cutout.
基底干骺端股骨颈骨折是一种罕见的股骨近端骨折,其内置物失败率较高。在扭转负荷下,对于股骨颈骨折,使用中空钉(CMN)和动力髋螺钉(DHS)的生物力学比较研究还很少。本研究比较了在早期活动期间扭转负荷下,三种固定方法治疗基底干骺端股骨颈骨折的生物力学性能。
生物力学研究模型使用了三种固定方法:DHS、带防旋螺钉的 DHS 和短 CMN。有限元分析用于模拟髋关节旋转,将与腿部摆动相关的肌肉力量应用于股骨。监测固定物的等效 von Mises 应力(EQV)、骨折块位移和近端松质骨的应变能密度,以评估固定的稳定性。
短 CMN 结构的 EQV(304.63 MPa)与钛 DHS 结构(293.39 MPa)相当,大于带防旋螺钉的钛 DHS 结构(200.94 MPa)。短 CMN 结构中的近端骨折块位移约为 0.13 mm,在所有结构中最大。短 CMN 中的拉力螺钉切割螺钉的风险比 DHS 和 DHS 带防旋螺钉结构高 3.1-5.8 倍。
在扭转负荷下,钛 DHS 联合防旋螺钉提供了比其他固定方法更低的骨折块位移、应力和股骨头应变能密度。使用 CMN 治疗基底干骺端股骨颈骨折可能会增加拉力螺钉切割螺钉的风险。