• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈干角骨折固定方式的抗扭转稳定性:一项生物力学研究。

Torsional stability of fixation methods in basicervical femoral neck fractures: a biomechanical study.

机构信息

Golden Jubilee Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Department of Orthopedic, Buddhachinraj Hospital, Phitsanulok, Thailand.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jun 22;19(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04842-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-024-04842-5
PMID:38909252
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11193902/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Basicervical femoral neck fracture is a rare proximal femur fracture with a high implant failure rate. Biomechanical comparisons between cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) and dynamic hip screws (DHSs) under torsion loading are lacking. This study compared the biomechanical performance of three fixations for basicervical femoral neck fractures under torsion load during early ambulation.

METHODS

The biomechanical study models used three fixations: a DHS, a DHS with an anti-rotation screw, and a short CMN. Finite element analysis was used to simulate hip rotation with muscle forces related to leg swing applied to the femur. The equivalent von Mises stress (EQV) on fixation, fragment displacement, and strain energy density at the proximal cancellous bone were monitored for fixation stability.

RESULTS

The EQV of the short CMN construct (304.63 MPa) was comparable to that of the titanium DHS construct (293.39 MPa) and greater than that of the titanium DHS with an anti-rotation screw construct (200.94 MPa). The proximal fragment displacement in the short CMN construct was approximately 0.13 mm, the greatest among the constructs. The risk of screw cutout for the lag screw in short CMNs was 3.1-5.8 times greater than that for DHSs and DHSs with anti-rotation screw constructs.

CONCLUSIONS

Titanium DHS combined with an anti-rotation screw provided lower fragment displacement, stress, and strain energy density in the femoral head than the other fixations under torsion load. Basicervical femoral neck fracture treated with CMNs may increase the risk of lag screw cutout.

摘要

背景

基底干骺端股骨颈骨折是一种罕见的股骨近端骨折,其内置物失败率较高。在扭转负荷下,对于股骨颈骨折,使用中空钉(CMN)和动力髋螺钉(DHS)的生物力学比较研究还很少。本研究比较了在早期活动期间扭转负荷下,三种固定方法治疗基底干骺端股骨颈骨折的生物力学性能。

方法

生物力学研究模型使用了三种固定方法:DHS、带防旋螺钉的 DHS 和短 CMN。有限元分析用于模拟髋关节旋转,将与腿部摆动相关的肌肉力量应用于股骨。监测固定物的等效 von Mises 应力(EQV)、骨折块位移和近端松质骨的应变能密度,以评估固定的稳定性。

结果

短 CMN 结构的 EQV(304.63 MPa)与钛 DHS 结构(293.39 MPa)相当,大于带防旋螺钉的钛 DHS 结构(200.94 MPa)。短 CMN 结构中的近端骨折块位移约为 0.13 mm,在所有结构中最大。短 CMN 中的拉力螺钉切割螺钉的风险比 DHS 和 DHS 带防旋螺钉结构高 3.1-5.8 倍。

结论

在扭转负荷下,钛 DHS 联合防旋螺钉提供了比其他固定方法更低的骨折块位移、应力和股骨头应变能密度。使用 CMN 治疗基底干骺端股骨颈骨折可能会增加拉力螺钉切割螺钉的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2590/11193902/374583737d78/13018_2024_4842_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2590/11193902/9128c88b03ea/13018_2024_4842_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2590/11193902/44ab65b2a43b/13018_2024_4842_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2590/11193902/241067bf3f82/13018_2024_4842_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2590/11193902/374583737d78/13018_2024_4842_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2590/11193902/9128c88b03ea/13018_2024_4842_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2590/11193902/44ab65b2a43b/13018_2024_4842_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2590/11193902/241067bf3f82/13018_2024_4842_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2590/11193902/374583737d78/13018_2024_4842_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Torsional stability of fixation methods in basicervical femoral neck fractures: a biomechanical study.颈干角骨折固定方式的抗扭转稳定性:一项生物力学研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jun 22;19(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04842-5.
2
Structure-mechanical analysis of various fixation constructs for basicervical fractures of the proximal femur and clinical implications; finite element analysis.各种固定结构治疗股骨近端基底干骨折的结构力学分析及临床意义;有限元分析。
Injury. 2023 Feb;54(2):370-378. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.12.004. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
3
Finite Element Analysis of Six Internal Fixations in the Treatment of Pauwels Type III Femoral Neck Fracture.Pauwels Ⅲ 型股骨颈骨折 6 种内固定物的有限元分析
Orthop Surg. 2024 Jul;16(7):1695-1709. doi: 10.1111/os.14069. Epub 2024 May 15.
4
Finite element analysis of basicervical femoral neck fracture treated with proximal femoral bionic nail.股骨近端仿生钉治疗基底干股颈骨折的有限元分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Dec 6;18(1):926. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04415-y.
5
Biomechanical comparison of dynamic hip screw, proximal femoral nail, cannulated screw, and monoaxial external fixation in the treatment of basicervical femoral neck fractures.动力髋螺钉、股骨近端髓内钉、空心螺钉及单轴外固定治疗股骨颈基底部骨折的生物力学比较
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2015;82(2):140-4.
6
Comparative biomechanical performance of two configurations of screw constructs and types used to stabilize different sites of unstable Pauwels type II femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis.两种不同构型螺钉固定结构和不同类型螺钉治疗不稳定型Ⅱ型股骨颈骨折的生物力学性能比较:有限元分析。
Med Eng Phys. 2022 Sep;107:103856. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103856. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
7
Biomechanical Comparison of Three Different Intramedullary Nails for Fixation of Unstable Basicervical Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Proximal Femur: Experimental Studies.三种不同髓内钉治疗不稳定股骨粗隆下基底骨折的生物力学比较:实验研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Dec 11;2018:7618079. doi: 10.1155/2018/7618079. eCollection 2018.
8
Biomechanical evaluation of different internal fixation methods based on finite element analysis for Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture.基于有限元分析的 Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折不同内固定方法的生物力学评价。
Injury. 2022 Oct;53(10):3115-3123. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.08.038. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
9
Basicervical fractures of the proximal femur. A biomechanical study of 3 internal fixation techniques.股骨近端基底部骨折。三种内固定技术的生物力学研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Sep(306):256-63.
10
Evaluating three internal fixation techniques for Pauwels III femoral neck fractures via finite element analysis.通过有限元分析评估三种 Pauwels III 型股骨颈骨折的内固定技术。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 5;14(1):15519. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66638-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Single-plane osteotomy model is inaccurate for evaluating the optimal strategy in treating vertical femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis.单平面截骨模型在评估垂直型股骨颈骨折的最佳治疗策略时不准确:一项有限元分析。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024 Mar;245:108036. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108036. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
2
What is the most fixable intramedullary implant for basicervical fracture and transcervical shear fracture? - A finite element study.对于基底颈椎骨折和经颈椎剪切骨折,哪种髓内植入物最具固定性?——一项有限元研究。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 Sep 20;34:102015. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.102015. eCollection 2022 Nov.
3
Evaluation of a Locking Autocompression Screw Model in Pauwels Type-3 Femoral Neck Fracture: In Vitro Analysis.
Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折锁定自动加压螺钉模型的评估:体外分析
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Sep 12;9(9):464. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9090464.
4
Cephalomedullary Nailing versus Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation in Basicervical Femoral Neck Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.头髓钉与动力髋螺钉固定在股骨颈基底部骨折中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Yonsei Med J. 2022 Aug;63(8):744-750. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.8.744.
5
Biomechanical performance of short and long cephalomedullary nail constructs for stabilizing different levels of subtrochanteric fracture.短和长股骨近端髓内钉构建物在稳定不同部位转子下骨折的生物力学性能。
Injury. 2022 Feb;53(2):323-333. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.11.064. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
6
The addition of an anti-rotation screw to the dynamic hip screw.动力髋螺钉中加入抗旋转螺钉。
Acta Orthop Belg. 2020 Jun;86(2):233-238.
7
Review on Basicervical Femoral Neck Fracture: Definition, Treatments, and Failures.股骨颈基底部骨折综述:定义、治疗及失败案例
Hip Pelvis. 2020 Dec;32(4):170-181. doi: 10.5371/hp.2020.32.4.170. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
8
Biomechanical comparison of five cannulated screw fixation strategies for young vertical femoral neck fractures.五种空心螺钉固定策略治疗青年垂直股骨颈骨折的生物力学比较。
J Orthop Res. 2021 Aug;39(8):1669-1680. doi: 10.1002/jor.24881. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
9
Biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation implants for femoral neck fractures: A comparative finite element analysis.股骨颈骨折内固定植入物的生物力学评估:比较有限元分析。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Nov;196:105714. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105714. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
10
Stability of femoral neck fracture fixation: A finite element analysis.股骨颈骨折内固定的稳定性:有限元分析
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2019 Sep;233(9):892-900. doi: 10.1177/0954411919856138. Epub 2019 Jun 15.