Samsami Shabnam, Augat Peter, Rouhi Gholamreza
1 Institute for Biomechanics, Trauma Center Murnau, Murnau, Germany.
2 Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2019 Sep;233(9):892-900. doi: 10.1177/0954411919856138. Epub 2019 Jun 15.
Femoral neck fractures represent a relatively uncommon injury in the non-elderly population often resulting from high-energy trauma. Clinical outcome in these patients can be improved by optimizing surgical procedures and selecting appropriate fixation methods. The aim of this study was to develop a numerical fracture model to investigate the influence of critical mechanical factors on the stability of fixation methods for femoral neck fractures. The mechanical stability of fracture fixation was assessed through employing finite element models and simulating progressive consolidation of the fracture for a vertical femoral neck fracture (i.e. Pauwels type III in which the angle between the fracture line and the horizontal plane is greater than 70°). Mechanical performance was compared among three different fixation methods (cannulated screws, dynamic hip screw with de-rotational screw, and proximal femoral locking plate). Axial femoral head displacement varied from 2.3 mm for cannulated screws to 1.12 mm for proximal femoral locking plate, although dynamic hip screw with de-rotational screw indicated a value of 0.94 mm. Considering a consolidated fracture and full weight-bearing load case, average displacements of fracture fragments were obtained of about 1.5, 3 and 70 µm for dynamic hip screw with de-rotational screw, proximal femoral locking plate and cannulated screws methods, respectively. In terms of interfragmentary movements at the fracture site, outcomes of this study demonstrated that, in agreement with our previous experimental research, the dynamic hip screw with de-rotational screw implant is a more effective choice than cannulated screws and proximal femoral locking plate techniques for vertical femoral neck fractures in young patients. Thus, one may conclude that the use of dynamic hip screw with de-rotational screw, particularly during the early stages of bone healing, could provide suitable mechanical environments that facilitate direct bone formation and shorter healing times.
股骨颈骨折在非老年人群中相对少见,通常由高能创伤导致。通过优化手术操作和选择合适的固定方法,可以改善这些患者的临床结局。本研究的目的是建立一个数值骨折模型,以研究关键力学因素对股骨颈骨折固定方法稳定性的影响。通过使用有限元模型并模拟垂直股骨颈骨折(即 Pauwels Ⅲ型,骨折线与水平面夹角大于70°)的骨折渐进性愈合过程,评估骨折固定的力学稳定性。比较了三种不同固定方法(空心螺钉、带防旋螺钉的动力髋螺钉和股骨近端锁定钢板)的力学性能。股骨头轴向位移从空心螺钉的2.3毫米到股骨近端锁定钢板的1.12毫米不等,带防旋螺钉的动力髋螺钉的值为0.94毫米。考虑骨折愈合且完全负重的载荷情况,带防旋螺钉的动力髋螺钉、股骨近端锁定钢板和空心螺钉方法的骨折碎片平均位移分别约为1.5、3和70微米。就骨折部位的骨折块间运动而言,本研究结果表明,与我们之前的实验研究一致,对于年轻患者的垂直股骨颈骨折,带防旋螺钉的动力髋螺钉植入物比空心螺钉和股骨近端锁定钢板技术是更有效的选择。因此,可以得出结论,使用带防旋螺钉的动力髋螺钉,特别是在骨愈合的早期阶段,可以提供合适的力学环境,促进直接骨形成并缩短愈合时间。