Jorba-García Adrià, Ruiz-Romero Víctor, Bara-Casaus Jose Javier, Camps-Font Octavi, Sánchez-Garcés Maria Ángeles, Figueiredo Rui, Valmaseda-Castellón Eduard
Master of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Researcher at the IDIBELL Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Master of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
J Dent. 2024 Sep;148:105150. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105150. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
To compare the accuracy and operative time of implant placement using a dynamic computer assisted implant surgery (dCAIS) system based on a cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) image, with and without superimposing a standard tessellation language (STL) file of an intraoral scan of the patient.
Ten identical resin models simulating an upper maxilla with posterior edentulism were assigned to two groups. In the CBCT+STL group, a CBCT file and an intraoral STL file were superimposed and used for registration; in the CBCT group, registration was performed using CBCT images. Six implants were placed in each model using the Navident® dynamic navigation system. Anatomy registration was performed by tracing fiducial points on the CBCT or STL image, depending on the group. Preoperative and postoperative CBCT images were overlaid to assess implant placement accuracy.
Sixty implants were analyzed (30 implants in each group). 3D platform deviation was significantly lower (mean difference (MD): 0.17 mm; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.01 to 0.23; P = 0.039) in the CBCT+STL group (mean: 0.71 mm; standard deviation (SD): 0.29) than in the CBCT group (mean: 0.88 mm; SD: 0.39). The remaining accuracy outcome variables (angular deviation MD: -0.01; platform lateral deviation MD: 0.08 mm; apex global MD: 0.01 mm; apex depth MD: 0.33 mm) and surgery time (MD: 3.383 min.) were similar in both groups (p > 0.05).
The introduction of an intraoral scan (STL) seems to reduce deviations slightly in dental implant placement with dCAIS systems. However, the clinical repercussion of this improvement is questionable.
Superimposing an intraoral scan on the CBCT image does not seem to increase the accuracy of dCAIS systems but can be useful when radiographic artifacts are present.
比较基于锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像的动态计算机辅助种植手术(dCAIS)系统在叠加和不叠加患者口腔扫描的标准镶嵌语言(STL)文件的情况下,种植体植入的准确性和手术时间。
将十个模拟上颌后牙缺失的相同树脂模型分为两组。在CBCT+STL组中,将CBCT文件和口腔内STL文件叠加并用于配准;在CBCT组中,使用CBCT图像进行配准。使用Navident®动态导航系统在每个模型中植入六颗种植体。根据分组情况,通过在CBCT或STL图像上追踪基准点进行解剖学配准。术前和术后CBCT图像叠加以评估种植体植入的准确性。
共分析了60颗种植体(每组30颗)。CBCT+STL组的三维平台偏差显著低于CBCT组(平均差值(MD):0.17mm;95%置信区间(CI):0.01至0.23;P = 0.039)(CBCT+STL组平均:0.71mm;标准差(SD):0.29)(CBCT组平均:0.88mm;SD:0.39)。其余准确性结果变量(角度偏差MD:-0.01;平台侧向偏差MD: