Lucea Marguerite B, Ramirez Andrea, Martino Natalie
Author Affiliations: Department of Nursing, College of Health Professions, Towson University.
Department of Forensic Science, Fischer College of Math and Sciences, Towson University.
J Forensic Nurs. 2024;20(4):265-276. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000493. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
Sexual violence by an intimate partner or by a stranger remains highly prevalent in the United States. Yet, the use of post-sexual-assault health care is still underutilized. Persons in vulnerable populations such as immigrants, LGBTQIA+, and Black women may experience additional barriers to care.
We sought to determine the extant research in this area, the methodologies used, and whether specific barriers exist for seeking sexual assault services. We sought to understand if barriers differed for vulnerable populations.
Peer-reviewed literature published before September 2023, written in English, conducted in the United States, and that included survivors of sexual violence and explored barriers to seeking care postassault (i.e., sexual assault nurse examiners) were included in the review.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews protocols were followed. PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and PTSDpubs databases were used to identify literature that met the inclusion criteria, from which we selected 14 publications.
Much of the literature employed qualitative or mixed methods designs. Several studies focused on underserved minority groups, including immigrant women, Black women, and homeless youth. Common barriers existed on the intrapersonal, interpersonal, organizational, community, and societal levels.
The literature provided substantive context for the multilevel barriers, all contributing to survivors remaining silent rather than seeking much-needed help. Although there is a need for additional research on barriers to sexual assault services specifically, the extant research supports strengthening multilevel, alternative approaches to deliver much-needed services.
在美国,亲密伴侣或陌生人实施的性暴力仍然非常普遍。然而,性侵犯后医疗保健的使用仍然未得到充分利用。移民、LGBTQIA+群体以及黑人女性等弱势群体在获得医疗服务方面可能会遇到更多障碍。
我们试图确定该领域的现有研究、所使用的方法,以及寻求性侵犯服务是否存在特定障碍。我们试图了解弱势群体面临的障碍是否有所不同。
纳入2023年9月之前发表的、用英文撰写、在美国开展的同行评审文献,这些文献纳入了性暴力幸存者,并探讨了性侵犯后寻求医疗服务的障碍(即性侵犯护士检查员)。
遵循系统评价和元分析扩展的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)方案。使用PubMed、Scopus、CINAHL、PsycINFO和PTSDpubs数据库来识别符合纳入标准的文献,从中我们选择了14篇出版物。
大部分文献采用了定性或混合方法设计。几项研究关注了服务不足的少数群体,包括移民妇女、黑人妇女和无家可归的青少年。在个人、人际、组织、社区和社会层面存在常见障碍。
这些文献为多层次障碍提供了实质性背景,所有这些障碍都导致幸存者保持沉默而不是寻求急需的帮助。尽管特别需要对性侵犯服务的障碍进行更多研究,但现有研究支持加强多层次的替代方法来提供急需的服务。