University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Pure Earth, New York, NY, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 24;19(6):e0298504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298504. eCollection 2024.
Chemical contamination and pollution are an ongoing threat to human health and the environment. The concern over the consequences of chemical exposures at the global level continues to grow. Because resources are constrained, there is a need to prioritize interventions focused on the greatest health impact. Data, especially related to chemical exposures, are rarely available for most substances of concern, and alternate methods to evaluate their impact are needed.
STRUCTURED EXPERT JUDGMENT (SEJ) PROCESS: A Structured Expert Judgment (Research Outreach, 2021) process was performed to provide plausible estimates of health impacts for 16 commonly found pollutants: asbestos, arsenic, benzene, chromium, cadmium, dioxins, fluoride, highly hazardous pesticides (HHPs), lead, mercury, polycyclic-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances (PFAs), phthalates, endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs), and brominated flame retardants (BRFs). This process, undertaken by sector experts, weighed individual estimations of the probable global health scale health impacts of each pollutant using objective estimates of the expert opinions' statistical accuracy and informativeness.
The foremost substances, in terms of mean projected annual total deaths, were lead, asbestos, arsenic, and HHPs. Lead surpasses the others by a large margin, with an estimated median value of 1.7 million deaths annually. The three other substances averaged between 136,000 and 274,000 deaths per year. Of the 12 other chemicals evaluated, none reached an estimated annual death count exceeding 100,000. These findings underscore the importance of prioritizing available resources on reducing and remediating the impacts of these key pollutants.
Based on the evidence available, experts concluded some of the more notorious chemical pollutants, such as PCBs and dioxin, do not result in high levels of human health impact from a global scale perspective. However, the chemical toxicity of some compounds released in recent decades, such as Endocrine Disrupters and PFAs, cannot be ignored, even if current impacts are limited. Moreover, the impact of some chemicals may be disproportionately large in some geographic areas. Continued research and monitoring are essential; and a preventative approach is needed for chemicals.
These results, and potential similar analyses of other chemicals, are provided as inputs to ongoing discussions about priority setting for global chemicals and pollution management. Furthermore, we suggest that this SEJ process be repeated periodically as new information becomes available.
化学污染和污染是对人类健康和环境的持续威胁。人们对全球层面化学暴露后果的担忧持续增加。由于资源有限,需要优先考虑针对最大健康影响的干预措施。对于大多数关注的物质,很少有数据,特别是与化学暴露有关的数据,因此需要替代方法来评估其影响。
结构化专家判断(SEJ)过程:进行了结构化专家判断(Research Outreach,2021)过程,以提供 16 种常见污染物的健康影响的合理估计:石棉、砷、苯、铬、镉、二恶英、氟化物、高危害农药(HHPs)、铅、汞、多环芳烃(PAHs)、多氯联苯(PCBs)、全氟和多氟化合物(PFAs)、邻苯二甲酸盐、内分泌干扰化学物质(EDCs)和溴化阻燃剂(BRFs)。该过程由部门专家进行,使用专家意见的统计准确性和信息量的客观估计,权衡每个污染物的全球健康影响的个体估计。
就预计每年总死亡人数而言,最重要的物质是铅、石棉、砷和 HHPs。铅的死亡率远远超过其他物质,估计每年有 170 万人死亡。其他三种物质每年的平均死亡人数在 136,000 到 274,000 人之间。在评估的其他 12 种化学物质中,没有一种达到每年超过 100,000 人死亡的估计数。这些发现强调了优先考虑减少和补救这些关键污染物影响的重要性。
根据现有证据,专家得出结论,一些更臭名昭著的化学污染物,如多氯联苯和二恶英,从全球规模的角度来看,不会对人类健康产生高影响。然而,一些化合物的化学毒性,如内分泌干扰物和全氟和多氟化合物,不能被忽视,即使目前的影响是有限的。此外,在某些地理区域,一些化学物质的影响可能不成比例地大。需要继续研究和监测,并且需要对化学品采取预防措施。
这些结果,以及对其他化学物质的潜在类似分析,作为正在进行的全球化学品和污染管理优先事项讨论的投入。此外,我们建议随着新信息的出现,定期重复进行这种 SEJ 过程。