Birnbaum Linda S, Staskal Daniele F
Office of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Experimental Toxicology Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Jan;112(1):9-17. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6559.
Brominated flame retardants (BFRs) have routinely been added to consumer products for several decades in a successful effort to reduce fire-related injury and property damage. Recently, concern for this emerging class of chemicals has risen because of the occurrence of several classes of BFRs in the environment and in human biota. The widespread production and use of BFRs; strong evidence of increasing contamination of the environment, wildlife, and people; and limited knowledge of potential effects heighten the importance of identifying emerging issues associated with the use of BFRs. In this article, we briefly review scientific issues associated with the use of tetrabromobisphenol A, hexabromocyclododecane, and three commercial mixtures of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and discuss data gaps. Overall, the toxicology database is very limited; the current literature is incomplete and often conflicting. Available data, however, raise concern over the use of certain classes of brominated flame retardants.
几十年来,溴化阻燃剂(BFRs)一直被常规添加到消费品中,这在减少与火灾相关的伤害和财产损失方面取得了成功。最近,由于几类BFRs在环境和人类生物群中的出现,人们对这类新兴化学品的关注度有所提高。BFRs的广泛生产和使用;环境、野生动物和人类受污染程度不断增加的有力证据;以及对潜在影响的了解有限,都凸显了识别与BFRs使用相关的新出现问题的重要性。在本文中,我们简要回顾了与四溴双酚A、六溴环十二烷以及三种多溴二苯醚商业混合物使用相关的科学问题,并讨论了数据空白。总体而言,毒理学数据库非常有限;当前的文献不完整且常常相互矛盾。然而,现有数据引发了人们对某些类别的溴化阻燃剂使用的担忧。