Elbin R J, Durfee Kori J, Womble Melissa N, Jennings Sabrina, Fedor Sheri, Dollar Christina M, Felt John M, Elbich Daniel B, Hakun Jonathan G
Author Affiliations: Department of Health, Human Performance and Recreation/Office for Sport Concussion Research, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas (Dr Elbin and Ms Durfee); Inova Sports Medicine Concussion Program, Fairfax, Virginia (Drs Womble, Jennings, Fedor, and Dollar); Inova Physical Therapy Center, Fairfax, Virginia (Dr Fedor); Center for Healthy Aging, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania (Drs Felt and Hakun); Department of Neurology, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (Drs Elbich and Hakun); Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania (Dr Hakun); Department of Public Health Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (Dr Hakun) and Translational Brain Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (Dr Hakun).
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2025;40(1):E87-E95. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000977. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
Evaluate compliance, symptom reactivity, and acceptability/experience ratings for an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) protocol involving ultra-brief ambulatory cognitive assessments in adolescent and young adult patients with concussion.
Outpatient concussion clinic.
116 patients aged 13 to 25 years with concussion.
Prospective research design was used to examine compliance, symptom reactivity, and acceptability/experience for the Mobile Neurocognitive Health Project (MNCH); an EMA study of environmental exposures, symptoms, objective cognitive functioning, and symptom reactivity involving 4, daily EMA surveys (7:30 am , 10:30 am , 3:00 pm , 8:00 pm ) for a period of 7 days following concussion. Overall compliance rates, symptom reactivity scores, and participant acceptability/experience ratings were described. A series of non-parametric Friedman Tests with post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to examine differences in compliance and reactivity related to time of day and over the course of the protocol (first 3 days [Early Week] vs last 4 days [Late Week]).
Compliance rates, symptom reactivity scores, participant experience/acceptability.
Overall median compliance was 71%, and there were significantly fewer 7:30 am surveys completed compared to the 10:30 am ( Z = -4 .88, P ≤ .001), 3:00 pm ( Z = -4 .13, P ≤ .001), and 8:00 pm ( Z = -4 .68, P ≤ .001) surveys. Compliance for Early Week surveys were significantly higher than Late Week ( Z = -2 .16, P = .009). The median symptom reactivity score was 34.39 out of 100 and was significantly higher for Early Week compared to Late Week ( Z = -4 .59, P ≤ .001). Ninety-nine percent (89/90) of the sample agreed that the app was easy to use, and 18% (16/90) indicated that the app interfered with their daily life.
Adolescents and young adults with concussion were compliant with the MNCH EMA protocol. Symptom reactivity to the protocol was low and the majority of participants reported that the app and protocol were acceptable. These findings support further investigation into applications of EMA for use in concussion studies.
评估一项生态瞬时评估(EMA)方案的依从性、症状反应性以及可接受性/体验评分,该方案涉及对青少年和年轻成人脑震荡患者进行超简短的动态认知评估。
门诊脑震荡诊所。
116名年龄在13至25岁之间的脑震荡患者。
采用前瞻性研究设计来检查移动神经认知健康项目(MNCH)的依从性、症状反应性以及可接受性/体验;这是一项关于环境暴露、症状、客观认知功能和症状反应性的EMA研究,在脑震荡后的7天内,每天进行4次EMA调查(上午7:30、上午10:30、下午3:00、晚上8:00)。描述了总体依从率、症状反应性得分以及参与者的可接受性/体验评分。使用一系列非参数Friedman检验及事后Wilcoxon符号秩检验来检查与一天中的时间以及方案过程(前3天[本周早期]与后4天[本周晚期])相关的依从性和反应性差异。
依从率、症状反应性得分、参与者体验/可接受性。
总体中位数依从率为71%,与上午10:30(Z = -4.88,P≤.001)、下午3:00(Z = -4.13,P≤.001)和晚上8:00(Z = -4.68,P≤.001)的调查相比,上午7:30完成的调查显著更少。本周早期调查的依从性显著高于本周晚期(Z = -2.16,P =.009)。症状反应性得分中位数为100分中的34.39分,本周早期显著高于本周晚期(Z = -4.59,P≤.001)。99%(89/90)的样本认为该应用程序易于使用,18%(16/90)表示该应用程序干扰了他们的日常生活。
患有脑震荡的青少年和年轻成人遵守了MNCH EMA方案。该方案的症状反应性较低,大多数参与者报告该应用程序和方案是可接受的。这些发现支持进一步研究EMA在脑震荡研究中的应用。