复杂区域疼痛综合征患者药物治疗的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Efficacy and Safety of Pharmacological Treatment in Patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Zhu He, Wen Bei, Xu Jijun, Zhang Yuelun, Xu Li, Huang Yuguang

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China.

Department of Pain Management, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.

出版信息

Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Jun 20;17(6):811. doi: 10.3390/ph17060811.

Abstract

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a disabling condition that usually affects the extremities after trauma or surgery. At present, there is no FDA-approved pharmacological treatment for patients with CRPS. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmacological therapies and determine the best strategy for CRPS. We searched the databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov, for published eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pharmacological treatment with placebo in CRPS patients. Target patients were diagnosed with CRPS according to Budapest Criteria in 2012 or the 1994 consensus-based IASP CRPS criteria. Finally, 23 RCTs comprising 1029 patients were included. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to rate certainty (confidence in evidence and quality of evidence). Direct meta-analysis showed that using bisphosphonates (BPs) (mean difference [MD] -2.21, 95% CI -4.36--0.06, = 0.04, moderate certainty) or ketamine (mean difference [MD] -0.78, 95% CI -1.51--0.05, = 0.04, low certainty) could provide long-term (beyond one month) pain relief. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the efficacy of short-term pain relief. Ketamine (rank = 0.55) and BPs (rank = 0.61) appeared to be the best strategies for CRPS pain relief. Additionally, BPs (risk ratio [RR] = 1.86, 95% CI 1.34-2.57, 0.01, moderate certainty) and ketamine (risk ratio [RR] = 3.45, 95% CI 1.79-6.65, 0.01, moderate certainty) caused more adverse events, which were mild, and no special intervention was required. In summary, among pharmacological interventions, ketamine and bisphosphonate injection seemed to be the best treatment for CRPS without severe adverse events.

摘要

复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)是一种致残性疾病,通常在创伤或手术后影响四肢。目前,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)尚未批准用于CRPS患者的药物治疗。我们进行了这项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估药物治疗的疗效和安全性,并确定CRPS的最佳治疗策略。我们检索了包括PubMed、Embase、Cochrane、科学网、Scopus和ClinicalTrials.gov在内的数据库,以查找已发表的符合条件的随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验比较了CRPS患者药物治疗与安慰剂治疗的效果。目标患者根据2012年布达佩斯标准或1994年基于共识的国际疼痛研究协会(IASP)CRPS标准被诊断为CRPS。最终,纳入了23项RCT,共1029例患者。我们使用推荐分级、评估、制定和评价(GRADE)方法对确定性(证据的可信度和证据质量)进行评级。直接荟萃分析表明,使用双膦酸盐(BPs)(平均差[MD]-2.21,95%置信区间-4.36--0.06,P = 0.04,中等确定性)或氯胺酮(平均差[MD]-0.78,95%置信区间-1.51--0.05,P = 0.04,低确定性)可以提供长期(超过1个月)的疼痛缓解。然而,短期疼痛缓解的疗效在统计学上没有显著差异。氯胺酮(排名 = 0.55)和双膦酸盐(排名 = 0.61)似乎是缓解CRPS疼痛的最佳策略。此外,双膦酸盐(风险比[RR]=1.86,95%置信区间1.34-2.57,P < 0.01,中等确定性)和氯胺酮(风险比[RR]=3.45,95%置信区间1.79-6.65,P < 0.01,中等确定性)导致更多不良事件,但这些事件较轻,无需特殊干预。总之,在药物干预中,氯胺酮和双膦酸盐注射似乎是治疗CRPS的最佳方法,且无严重不良事件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df29/11206895/5401aecd6a6f/pharmaceuticals-17-00811-g001.jpg

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索