• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

碳卫星视角下全球五大碳排放国的碳中和状况。

The status of carbon neutrality of the world's top 5 CO emitters as seen by carbon satellites.

作者信息

Jiang Fei, He Wei, Ju Weimin, Wang Hengmao, Wu Mousong, Wang Jun, Feng Shuzhuang, Zhang Lingyu, Chen Jing M

机构信息

Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology, International Institute for Earth System Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China.

Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing 210023, China.

出版信息

Fundam Res. 2022 Feb 15;2(3):357-366. doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2022.02.001. eCollection 2022 May.

DOI:10.1016/j.fmre.2022.02.001
PMID:38933397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11197612/
Abstract

China, the Unite States (US), the European Union (EU), India, and Russia are the world's top 5 fossil fuel and cement CO (FFC) emitting countries or regions (CRs). It is very important to understand their status of carbon neutrality, and to monitor their future changes of net carbon fluxes (NCFs). In this study, we implemented a well-established global carbon assimilation system (GCAS, Version 2) to infer global surface carbon fluxes from May 2009 to December 2019 using both GOSAT and OCO-2 XCO retrievals. The reductions of flux uncertainty and XCO bias, and the evaluation of posterior flux show that GCAS has comparable and good performance in the 5 CRs. The results suggest that Russia has achieved carbon neutrality, but the other 4 are still far from being carbon neutral, especially China. The mean annual NCFs in China, the US, the EU, India, and Russia are 2.33 ± 0.29, 0.82 ± 0.20, 0.42 ± 0.16, 0.50 ± 0.12, and -0.33 ± 0.23 PgC yr, respectively. From 2010 to 2019, the NCFs showed an increasing trend in the US and India, a slight downward trend after 2013 in China, and were stable in the EU. The changes of land sinks in China and the US might be the main reason for their trends. India's trend was mainly due to the increase of FFC emission. The relative contributions of NCFs to the global land net carbon emission of China and the EU have decreased, while those of the US and India have increased, implying the US and India must take more active measures to control carbon emissions or increase their sinks. This study indicates that satellite XCO could be successfully used to monitor the changes of regional NCFs, which is of great significance for major countries to achieve greenhouse gas control goals.

摘要

中国、美国、欧盟、印度和俄罗斯是全球五大化石燃料和水泥二氧化碳(FFC)排放国或地区。了解它们的碳中和状况,并监测其未来净碳通量(NCF)的变化非常重要。在本研究中,我们实施了一个成熟的全球碳同化系统(GCAS,版本2),利用GOSAT和OCO - 2的XCO反演数据,推断2009年5月至2019年12月的全球地表碳通量。通量不确定性和XCO偏差的降低以及后验通量的评估表明,GCAS在这五个国家或地区具有相当且良好的性能。结果表明,俄罗斯已实现碳中和,但其他四个国家或地区距离碳中和仍有很大差距,尤其是中国。中国、美国、欧盟、印度和俄罗斯的年均NCF分别为2.33±0.29、0.82±0.20、0.42±0.16、0.50±0.12和 - 0.33±0.23PgC/yr。2010年至2019年期间,美国和印度的NCF呈上升趋势,中国在2013年后略有下降趋势,欧盟则保持稳定。中国和美国陆地碳汇的变化可能是其趋势的主要原因。印度的趋势主要是由于FFC排放量的增加。中国和欧盟的NCF对全球陆地净碳排放的相对贡献有所下降,而美国和印度的贡献有所增加,这意味着美国和印度必须采取更积极的措施来控制碳排放或增加碳汇。本研究表明,卫星XCO可成功用于监测区域NCF的变化,这对主要国家实现温室气体控制目标具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
The status of carbon neutrality of the world's top 5 CO emitters as seen by carbon satellites.碳卫星视角下全球五大碳排放国的碳中和状况。
Fundam Res. 2022 Feb 15;2(3):357-366. doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2022.02.001. eCollection 2022 May.
2
Characterizing the regional XCO variability and its association with ENSO over India inferred from GOSAT and OCO-2 satellite observations.基于GOSAT和OCO - 2卫星观测数据对印度地区XCO变率特征及其与ENSO的关系进行研究。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Dec 1;902:166176. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166176. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
3
Mapping contiguous XCO by machine learning and analyzing the spatio-temporal variation in China from 2003 to 2019.运用机器学习技术对中国 2003 年至 2019 年的连续 XCO 进行空间制图,并分析其时空变化。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Feb 1;858(Pt 2):159588. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159588. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
4
A Global Synthesis Inversion Analysis of Recent Variability in CO Fluxes Using GOSAT and In Situ Observations.利用GOSAT和实地观测对CO通量近期变化进行的全球综合反演分析
Atmos Chem Phys. 2018 Aug;18(15):11097-11124. doi: 10.5194/acp-18-11097-2018. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
5
The carbon budget of China: 1980-2021.中国的碳预算:1980 - 2021年
Sci Bull (Beijing). 2024 Jan 15;69(1):114-124. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2023.11.016. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
6
Impacts of Spatial Resolution and XCO Precision on Satellite Capability for CO Plumes Detection.空间分辨率和XCO精度对卫星探测一氧化碳羽流能力的影响。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Mar 15;24(6):1881. doi: 10.3390/s24061881.
7
A comprehensive estimate of recent carbon sinks in China using both top-down and bottom-up approaches.运用自上而下和自下而上的方法对中国近期碳汇进行综合评估。
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 29;6:22130. doi: 10.1038/srep22130.
8
Benefits of satellite XCO and newly proposed atmospheric CO observation network over India in constraining regional CO fluxes.卫星 XCO 和新提出的大气 CO 观测网络对印度约束区域 CO 通量的优势。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Mar 15;812:151508. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151508. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
9
The Open-source Data Inventory for Anthropogenic Carbon dioxide (CO), version 2016 (ODIAC2016): A global, monthly fossil-fuel CO gridded emission data product for tracer transport simulations and surface flux inversions.人为二氧化碳(CO)开源数据清单,2016版(ODIAC2016):一种用于示踪剂传输模拟和表面通量反演的全球月度化石燃料CO网格化排放数据产品。
Earth Syst Sci Data. 2018;10(1):87-107. doi: 10.5194/essd-10-87-2018. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
10
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Uncovering the CO emissions of vehicles: A well-to-wheel approach.揭示车辆的一氧化碳排放:一种从井口到车轮的方法。
Fundam Res. 2023 Jul 16;4(5):1025-1035. doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2023.06.009. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Fundamental Research and Policy on Carbon Neutrality.碳中和的基础研究与政策
Fundam Res. 2022 May 20;2(3):355-356. doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2022.04.001. eCollection 2022 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Empirical estimates of regional carbon budgets imply reduced global soil heterotrophic respiration.区域碳预算的实证估计表明全球土壤异养呼吸减少。
Natl Sci Rev. 2020 Jul 7;8(2):nwaa145. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaa145. eCollection 2021 Feb.
2
Large Chinese land carbon sink estimated from atmospheric carbon dioxide data.大气二氧化碳数据估算的中国大规模陆地碳汇。
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7831):720-723. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2849-9. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
3
Altered energy partitioning across terrestrial ecosystems in the European drought year 2018.
2018 年欧洲干旱年陆地生态系统能量分配的改变。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Oct 26;375(1810):20190524. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0524. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
4
Impacts of extreme summers on European ecosystems: a comparative analysis of 2003, 2010 and 2018.极端夏季对欧洲生态系统的影响:2003、2010 和 2018 年的比较分析。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Oct 26;375(1810):20190507. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0507. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
5
Estimating US fossil fuel CO emissions from measurements of C in atmospheric CO.估算美国化石燃料 CO 排放的大气 CO 中 C 的测量值。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 16;117(24):13300-13307. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1919032117. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
6
Interannual variation of terrestrial carbon cycle: Issues and perspectives.陆地碳循环的年际变化:问题与展望。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Jan;26(1):300-318. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14884. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
7
The Open-source Data Inventory for Anthropogenic Carbon dioxide (CO), version 2016 (ODIAC2016): A global, monthly fossil-fuel CO gridded emission data product for tracer transport simulations and surface flux inversions.人为二氧化碳(CO)开源数据清单,2016版(ODIAC2016):一种用于示踪剂传输模拟和表面通量反演的全球月度化石燃料CO网格化排放数据产品。
Earth Syst Sci Data. 2018;10(1):87-107. doi: 10.5194/essd-10-87-2018. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
8
Climate change, human impacts, and carbon sequestration in China.中国的气候变化、人类影响与碳封存
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Apr 17;115(16):4015-4020. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700304115.
9
Contrasting carbon cycle responses of the tropical continents to the 2015-2016 El Niño.热带大陆对 2015-2016 年厄尔尼诺现象的碳循环响应对比。
Science. 2017 Oct 13;358(6360). doi: 10.1126/science.aam5690.
10
A comprehensive estimate of recent carbon sinks in China using both top-down and bottom-up approaches.运用自上而下和自下而上的方法对中国近期碳汇进行综合评估。
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 29;6:22130. doi: 10.1038/srep22130.