Turnaround Time of the Hematology Results of Cancer Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Opportunity to Initiate a Quality Improvement Process.

INTRODUCTION

Turnaround time (TAT) is a crucial clinical parameter that reflects the performance of a laboratory especially in the context of oncology and the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on the Lean Six Sigma methodology, we performed a retrospective analysis of the TAT of the complete blood count (CBC) of cancer patients with the aim of reducing this delay in the future.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over one month of the COVID-19 pandemic, a retrospective evaluative audit was carried out on the TAT of the CBC in an oncology department. The root causes of failures of the overall analysis process were detected. The initiation of an improvement approach was implemented through the creation of an improvement flowchart and a new request form. The hospital information system (HIS) data were exported to Microsoft Excel® (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, United States). Using the collected data, the mean, standard deviation, median, and interquartile range were calculated using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23, (Released 2015; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). All time intervals were expressed in minutes.

RESULTS

Among 263 intra-laboratory TATs analyzed, the median intra-lab TAT was 56 minutes (interquartile range (IQR): 36-80 minutes). A total of 82% of the analyses were performed in less than 90 minutes with a predominance of the interval 30-59 at 42.9%. The main causes of failures were essentially the lack of time stamping of the samples as well as the lack of real-time communication between the biologists and the clinicians. The proposed improvement model is currently being approved by all practitioners whose main items are as follows: At the clinical department level, distinguish the request forms but also the labels of the samples of the oncology hospital by a particular color, indication of clinical signs and sampling time on the request forms and on the HIS. At the laboratory level, create a specific chain for oncology department samples, alarm notification on the HIS, and rapid telecommunication of results for vital situations.

CONCLUSION

The intra-lab TAT of our study is biologically acceptable. Because our work is limited by the phases outside the control of the laboratory, it should lead to a continuous improvement project.