Kumar Anil, Jha Kunal Kumar, Olech Barbara, Goral Tomasz, Malinska Maura, Woźniak Krzysztof, Dominiak Paulina Maria
Biological and Chemical Research Centre, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, ul. Żwirki i Wigury 101, 02-089 Warszawa, Poland.
Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, Pasteura 1, 02-093 Warszawa, Poland.
Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem. 2024 Jul 1;80(Pt 7):264-277. doi: 10.1107/S2053229624005357. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
3D electron diffraction (3D ED), or microcrystal electron diffraction (MicroED), has become an alternative technique for determining the high-resolution crystal structures of compounds from sub-micron-sized crystals. Here, we considered L-alanine, α-glycine and urea, which are known to form good-quality crystals, and collected high-resolution 3D ED data on our in-house TEM instrument. In this study, we present a comparison of independent atom model (IAM) and transferable aspherical atom model (TAAM) kinematical refinement against experimental and simulated data. TAAM refinement on both experimental and simulated data clearly improves the model fitting statistics (R factors and residual electrostatic potential) compared to IAM refinement. This shows that TAAM better represents the experimental electrostatic potential of organic crystals than IAM. Furthermore, we compared the geometrical parameters and atomic displacement parameters (ADPs) resulting from the experimental refinements with the simulated refinements, with the periodic density functional theory (DFT) calculations and with published X-ray and neutron crystal structures. The TAAM refinements on the 3D ED data did not improve the accuracy of the bond lengths between the non-H atoms. The experimental 3D ED data provided more accurate H-atom positions than the IAM refinements on the X-ray diffraction data. The IAM refinements against 3D ED data had a tendency to lead to slightly longer X-H bond lengths than TAAM, but the difference was statistically insignificant. Atomic displacement parameters were too large by tens of percent for L-alanine and α-glycine. Most probably, other unmodelled effects were causing this behaviour, such as radiation damage or dynamical scattering.
三维电子衍射(3D ED),即微晶电子衍射(MicroED),已成为一种用于确定亚微米级晶体化合物高分辨率晶体结构的替代技术。在此,我们考虑了已知能形成高质量晶体的L-丙氨酸、α-甘氨酸和尿素,并在我们的内部透射电子显微镜仪器上收集了高分辨率的3D ED数据。在本研究中,我们针对实验数据和模拟数据,对独立原子模型(IAM)和可转移非球形原子模型(TAAM)的运动学精修进行了比较。与IAM精修相比,对实验数据和模拟数据进行TAAM精修均明显改善了模型拟合统计量(R因子和残余静电势)。这表明,与IAM相比,TAAM能更好地表示有机晶体的实验静电势。此外,我们将实验精修得到的几何参数和原子位移参数(ADPs)与模拟精修、周期性密度泛函理论(DFT)计算以及已发表的X射线和中子晶体结构进行了比较。对3D ED数据进行TAAM精修并未提高非氢原子之间键长的准确性。实验3D ED数据提供的氢原子位置比基于X射线衍射数据的IAM精修更准确。针对3D ED数据的IAM精修往往会导致X-H键长比TAAM略长,但差异在统计学上不显著。对于L-丙氨酸和α-甘氨酸,原子位移参数比实际值大了几十%。很可能是其他未建模的效应导致了这种情况,比如辐射损伤或动态散射。