Suppr超能文献

益生菌龈下应用辅助牙周炎刮治和根面平整的疗效和可行性。

Efficacy and Viability of Subgingival Application of Probiotics as an Adjunct to Scaling and Root Planing in Periodontitis.

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Dr. D Y Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Department of Microbiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Arts Commerce and Science College, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

Indian J Dent Res. 2024 Jan 1;35(1):59-64. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_533_23. Epub 2024 Jun 20.

Abstract

AIM

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of subgingivally applied probiotics as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) vs SRP alone in patients with periodontitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with periodontitis, with probing pocket depth (PPD) of 5-7 mm on at least two teeth on contralateral sites, were selected for the study and randomly allocated to the test group (n = 31) who underwent SRP along with subgingival application of probiotic paste and the control group (n = 31) who underwent only SRP. Clinical parameters were evaluated in both groups at baseline and after 12 weeks. The viability of probiotic bacteria was evaluated in the test group at baseline, day 4 and day 8.

RESULTS

All clinical parameters showed a statistically significant difference between baseline and 12 weeks on intragroup and intergroup comparison, with a greater improvement in the test group. Microbiological evaluation showed that the mean colony-forming units (CFUs) in the test group were 38.39 ± 7.76, 7.25 ± 2.72 and 1.57 ± 1.29 at baseline, day 4 and day 8, respectively. The mean CFUs significantly reduced with an increase in time from baseline to 8-day time interval.

CONCLUSION

It was seen that the probiotic bacteria remained viable in the periodontal pocket for up to 8 days after placement, but stable improvements were seen in all clinical parameters even at 12 weeks, indicating its prolonged efficacy. Thus, commercially available probiotics can prove to be an inexpensive method to treat periodontitis when combined with SRP.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较龈下应用益生菌作为辅助治疗与单独进行牙周洁治(SRP)对牙周炎患者的疗效。

材料与方法

选择患有牙周炎的患者,其在至少两颗对侧部位的牙齿上具有 5-7mm 的探诊袋深度(PPD),入选本研究并随机分配至试验组(n=31),该组患者接受 SRP 联合龈下应用益生菌糊剂,以及对照组(n=31),仅接受 SRP。在基线和 12 周时评估两组的临床参数。在基线、第 4 天和第 8 天评估试验组中益生菌的活菌数。

结果

在组内和组间比较中,所有临床参数均显示基线与 12 周时存在统计学显著差异,试验组的改善更大。微生物学评估显示,试验组的平均菌落形成单位(CFU)在基线、第 4 天和第 8 天分别为 38.39±7.76、7.25±2.72 和 1.57±1.29。CFU 均值随着从基线到 8 天时间间隔的时间增加而显著减少。

结论

可见,益生菌在放置后牙周袋中仍保持存活长达 8 天,但所有临床参数在 12 周时仍显示稳定改善,表明其具有延长的疗效。因此,当与 SRP 联合使用时,市售益生菌可被证明是一种治疗牙周炎的经济有效的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验