• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Personalized Cognitive Health in Psychiatry: Current State and the Promise of Computational Methods.精神病学中的个性化认知健康:现状和计算方法的前景。
Schizophr Bull. 2024 Aug 27;50(5):1028-1038. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbae108.
2
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
3
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
8
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
9
Psychological interventions for adults who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending.针对有性犯罪行为或有性犯罪风险的成年人的心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD007507. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007507.pub2.
10
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond reward learning deficits: Exploration-exploitation instability reveals computational heterogeneity in value-based decision making in early psychosis.超越奖赏学习缺陷:探索-利用不稳定性揭示了早期精神病基于价值决策中的计算异质性。
medRxiv. 2025 May 1:2025.04.29.25326698. doi: 10.1101/2025.04.29.25326698.
2
A retrospective, observational study of real-world clinical data from the Cognitive Function Development Therapy program.一项对认知功能发展治疗项目真实世界临床数据的回顾性观察研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Dec 18;18:1508815. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1508815. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Clarifying Cognitive Control Deficits in Psychosis via Drift Diffusion Modeling and Attractor Dynamics.通过漂移扩散建模和吸引子动力学澄清精神病中的认知控制缺陷。
Schizophr Bull. 2024 Nov 8;50(6):1357-1370. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbae014.
2
Intra- and inter-individual cognitive variability in schizophrenia and bipolar spectrum disorder: an investigation across multiple cognitive domains.精神分裂症和双相谱系障碍中的个体内和个体间认知变异性:跨多个认知领域的调查
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2023 Dec 18;9(1):89. doi: 10.1038/s41537-023-00414-4.
3
The Effects of Remote Cognitive Training Combined With a Mobile App Intervention on Psychosis: Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.远程认知训练联合移动应用干预对精神病的影响:双盲随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 13;25:e48634. doi: 10.2196/48634.
4
Cognitive Remediation Works But How Should We Provide It? An Adaptive Randomized Controlled Trial of Delivery Methods Using a Patient Nominated Recovery Outcome in First-Episode Participants.认知康复有效,但我们应该如何提供?使用首发参与者提名的康复结局对传递方法进行适应性随机对照试验。
Schizophr Bull. 2023 May 3;49(3):614-625. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac214.
5
The relevance of processing speed in the functioning of people with first-episode psychosis.首发精神病患者功能中处理速度的相关性。
J Psychiatr Res. 2023 Apr;160:171-176. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.02.014. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
6
Cognitive impairment in schizophrenia: aetiology, pathophysiology, and treatment.精神分裂症认知障碍:病因、发病机制与治疗。
Mol Psychiatry. 2023 May;28(5):1902-1918. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-01949-9. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
7
Developmental trajectories of premorbid functioning predict cognitive remediation treatment response in first-episode schizophrenia.首发精神分裂症患者病前功能的发展轨迹可预测认知矫正治疗的反应。
Psychol Med. 2023 Oct;53(13):6132-6141. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722003312. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
8
European Psychiatric Association guidance on assessment of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia.欧洲精神病学协会关于精神分裂症认知障碍评估的指南。
Eur Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 5;65(1):e58. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2316.
9
Social cognitive heterogeneity in schizophrenia: A cluster analysis.精神分裂症中的社会认知异质性:一项聚类分析。
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2022 Jul 7;30:100264. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2022.100264. eCollection 2022 Dec.
10
Humans can navigate complex graph structures acquired during latent learning.人类可以在潜在学习期间导航复杂的图形结构。
Cognition. 2022 Aug;225:105103. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105103. Epub 2022 Mar 29.

精神病学中的个性化认知健康:现状和计算方法的前景。

Personalized Cognitive Health in Psychiatry: Current State and the Promise of Computational Methods.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

Schizophr Bull. 2024 Aug 27;50(5):1028-1038. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbae108.

DOI:10.1093/schbul/sbae108
PMID:38934792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11349010/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Decades of research have firmly established that cognitive health and cognitive treatment services are a key need for people living with psychosis. However, many current clinical programs do not address this need, despite the essential role that an individual's cognitive and social cognitive capacities play in determining their real-world functioning. Preliminary practice-based research in the Early Psychosis Intervention Network early psychosis intervention network shows that it is possible to develop and implement tools that delineate an individuals' cognitive health profile and that help engage the client and the clinician in shared decision-making and treatment planning that includes cognitive treatments. These findings signify a promising shift toward personalized cognitive health.

STUDY DESIGN

Extending upon this early progress, we review the concept of interindividual variability in cognitive domains/processes in psychosis as the basis for offering personalized treatment plans. We present evidence from studies that have used traditional neuropsychological measures as well as findings from emerging computational studies that leverage trial-by-trial behavior data to illuminate the different latent strategies that individuals employ.

STUDY RESULT

We posit that these computational techniques, when combined with traditional cognitive assessments, can enrich our understanding of individual differences in treatment needs, which in turn can guide evermore personalized interventions.

CONCLUSION

As we find clinically relevant ways to decompose maladaptive behaviors into separate latent cognitive elements captured by model parameters, the ultimate goal is to develop and implement approaches that empower clients and their clinical providers to leverage individual's existing learning capacities to improve their cognitive health and well-being.

摘要

背景

数十年来的研究已经明确,认知健康和认知治疗服务是精神病患者的一项关键需求。然而,尽管个体的认知和社会认知能力在决定其现实生活功能方面起着至关重要的作用,但许多当前的临床项目并未满足这一需求。早期精神病干预网络的初步基于实践的研究表明,开发和实施能够描绘个体认知健康状况的工具,并帮助患者和临床医生共同决策和制定包含认知治疗的治疗计划是可行的。这些发现标志着向个性化认知健康的可喜转变。

设计

在这一早期进展的基础上,我们回顾了精神病患者认知领域/过程个体间变异性的概念,作为提供个性化治疗计划的基础。我们展示了使用传统神经心理学测量以及新兴计算研究的发现的证据,这些研究利用逐试行为数据来阐明个体采用的不同潜在策略。

研究结果

我们假设,这些计算技术与传统认知评估相结合,可以丰富我们对治疗需求个体差异的理解,从而进一步指导更具个性化的干预措施。

结论

随着我们找到临床上有意义的方法将适应不良行为分解为模型参数捕获的单独潜在认知元素,最终目标是开发和实施使患者及其临床提供者能够利用个体现有学习能力来改善认知健康和幸福感的方法。