Suppr超能文献

儿科重症监护病房以外的中心静脉通路装置的使用。

Use of central venous access devices outside of the pediatric intensive care units.

作者信息

Burek Alina G, Bumgardner Chris, Liljestrom Tracey, Porada Kelsey, Pan Amy Y, Liegl Melodee, Coon Eric R, Flynn Kathryn E, Ullman Amanda J, Brousseau David C

机构信息

Children's Wisconsin, 8915 W Connell Ct, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Res. 2025 Feb;97(2):664-670. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03337-7. Epub 2024 Jun 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Central venous access devices (CVAD) are associated with central line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and venous thromboembolism (VTE). We identified trends in non-intensive care unit (ICU) CVAD utilization, described complication rates, and compared resources between low and high CVAD sites.

METHODS

We combined data from the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database and surveys from included hospitals. We analyzed 10-year trends in CVAD encounters for non-ICU children between 01/2012-12/2021 and described variation and complication rates between 01/2017-12/2021. Using Fisher's exact test, we compared resources between low and high CVAD users.

RESULTS

CVAD use decreased from 6.3% to 3.8% of hospitalizations over 10 years. From 2017-2021, 67,830 encounters with CVAD were identified. Median age was 7 (IQR 2-13) years; 46% were female. Significant variation in CVAD utilization exists (range 1.4-16.9%). Rates of CLABSI and VTE were 4.0% and 3.4%, respectively. Survey responses from 33/41 (80%) hospitals showed 91% had vascular access teams, 30% used vascular access selection guides, and 70% used midline/long peripheral catheters. Low CVAD users were more likely to have a team guiding device selection (100% vs 43%, p = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

CVAD utilization decreased over time. Significant variation in CVAD use remains and may be associated with hospital resources.

IMPACT

Central venous access device (CVAD) use outside of the ICU is trending down; however, significant variation exists between institutions. Children with CVADs hospitalized on the acute care units had a CLABSI rate of 4% and VTE rate of 3.4%. 91% of surveyed institutions have a vascular access team; however, the services provided vary between institutions. Even though 70% of the surveyed institutions have the ability to place midline/long peripheral catheters, the majority use these catheters less than a few times per month. Institutions with low CVAD use are more likely to have a vascular access team that guides device selection.

摘要

背景

中心静脉通路装置(CVAD)与中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)和静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)有关。我们确定了非重症监护病房(ICU)中CVAD使用情况的趋势,描述了并发症发生率,并比较了低CVAD使用量医院和高CVAD使用量医院之间的资源情况。

方法

我们将来自儿科健康信息系统(PHIS)数据库的数据与纳入医院的调查数据相结合。我们分析了2012年1月至2021年12月期间非ICU儿童CVAD使用情况的10年趋势,并描述了2017年1月至2021年12月期间的差异和并发症发生率。使用Fisher精确检验,我们比较了低CVAD使用者和高CVAD使用者之间的资源情况。

结果

10年间,CVAD的使用在住院患者中的占比从6.3%降至3.8%。2017年至2021年期间,共识别出67830次CVAD使用情况。中位年龄为7岁(四分位间距2 - 13岁);46%为女性。CVAD使用情况存在显著差异(范围为1.4% - 16.9%)。CLABSI和VTE的发生率分别为4.0%和3.4%。41家医院中的33家(80%)的调查回复显示,91%的医院有血管通路团队,30%的医院使用血管通路选择指南,70%的医院使用中线/长外周导管。低CVAD使用者更有可能有一个团队指导装置选择(100%对43%,p = 0.026)。

结论

CVAD的使用随时间减少。CVAD使用情况仍存在显著差异,且可能与医院资源有关。

影响

ICU以外的中心静脉通路装置(CVAD)使用呈下降趋势;然而,各机构之间存在显著差异。在急性护理病房住院的使用CVAD的儿童,CLABSI发生率为4%,VTE发生率为3.4%。91%的受调查机构有血管通路团队;然而,各机构提供的服务有所不同。尽管70%的受调查机构有能力放置中线/长外周导管,但大多数机构每月使用这些导管的次数少于几次。CVAD使用量低的机构更有可能有一个指导装置选择的血管通路团队。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验