• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管(PICC)与完全植入式静脉输液港在儿科肿瘤患者中的比较:单中心研究。

Comparison of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) versus totally implantable venous-access ports in pediatric oncology patients, a single center study.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, No.107, West of Wenhua Road, 250012, Jinan, People's Republic of China.

School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 3;12(1):3510. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07584-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-07584-8
PMID:35241771
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8894364/
Abstract

To compare the efficacy of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and totally implantable venous-access ports (TIVAPs) for chemotherapy of pediatric patients with malignant tumors. A total of 96 children with malignant tumors who received catheterization of PICCs or TIVAPs for chemotherapy from May 2020 to May 2021 in Department of Pediatric Oncology of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University were selected. Then, the pathological features of disease, the age of children, the indwelling time, the incidence of postoperative complications, and the satisfaction degree were compared between the two groups. The age of children in the TIVAP group was younger than that in the PICC group (P < 0.05). The indwelling time in the TIVAP group was 7.2 ± 2.757 months,which was significantly longer than 5.65 ± 2.058 months in the PICC group (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the TIVAP group without systemic or local infection was markedly lower than that in the PICC group (P < 0.05). The satisfaction degree of patients in the TIVAP group without unsatisfied was markedly higher than that in the PICC group (P < 0.05). TIVAPs may be the first choice for chemotherapy of children with malignant tumors.

摘要

比较经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管(PICC)和完全植入式静脉输液港(TIVAP)在儿科恶性肿瘤患者化疗中的疗效。选取 2020 年 5 月至 2021 年 5 月在山东大学齐鲁医院小儿肿瘤科行 PICC 或 TIVAP 置管化疗的 96 例恶性肿瘤患儿,比较两组患儿疾病病理特征、年龄、置管时间、术后并发症发生率及满意度。TIVAP 组患儿年龄小于 PICC 组(P<0.05)。TIVAP 组置管时间 7.2±2.757 个月,明显长于 PICC 组的 5.65±2.058 个月(P<0.05)。TIVAP 组无全身或局部感染的术后并发症发生率明显低于 PICC 组(P<0.05)。TIVAP 组无不满意的患者满意度明显高于 PICC 组(P<0.05)。TIVAP 可作为儿科恶性肿瘤化疗的首选。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23e4/8894364/71c9322c552f/41598_2022_7584_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23e4/8894364/9de400cd4c76/41598_2022_7584_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23e4/8894364/7d62455de559/41598_2022_7584_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23e4/8894364/71c9322c552f/41598_2022_7584_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23e4/8894364/9de400cd4c76/41598_2022_7584_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23e4/8894364/7d62455de559/41598_2022_7584_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23e4/8894364/71c9322c552f/41598_2022_7584_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) versus totally implantable venous-access ports in pediatric oncology patients, a single center study.经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管(PICC)与完全植入式静脉输液港在儿科肿瘤患者中的比较:单中心研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 3;12(1):3510. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07584-8.
2
Central venous catheter-associated complications in pediatric patients diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma: implications for catheter choice.儿童霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中心静脉导管相关并发症:导管选择的意义。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Oct;30(10):8069-8079. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07256-3. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
3
Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with totally implantable venous access ports in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.癌症患者使用完全植入式静脉输液港相关的静脉血栓栓塞风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Sep;18(9):2253-2273. doi: 10.1111/jth.14930. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
4
A Frontline Approach With Peripherally Inserted Versus Centrally Inserted Central Venous Catheters for Remission Induction Chemotherapy Phase of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Randomized Comparison.急性髓系白血病缓解诱导化疗期经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管与中心静脉置管的一线对比:一项随机比较。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 Apr;19(4):e184-e194. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
5
Clinical impact of peripherally inserted central catheters vs implanted port catheters in patients with cancer: an open-label, randomised, two-centre trial.外周置入中心静脉导管与植入式港静脉导管在癌症患者中的临床影响:一项开放标签、随机、两中心试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Jun;122(6):734-741. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.038. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
6
Central venous access devices for the delivery of systemic anticancer therapy (CAVA): a randomised controlled trial.用于全身抗癌治疗(CAVA)的中央静脉通路装置:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2021 Jul 31;398(10298):403-415. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00766-2. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
7
Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in cancer patients under chemotherapy: A prospective study on the incidence of complications and overall failures.化疗期间癌症患者的外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC):并发症发生率及总体失败情况的前瞻性研究
J Surg Oncol. 2016 May;113(6):708-14. doi: 10.1002/jso.24220. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
8
Comparison of complications associated with peripherally inserted central catheters and Hickman™ catheters in patients with intestinal failure receiving home parenteral nutrition. Six-year follow up study.接受家庭肠外营养的肠衰竭患者中,外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管与希克曼导管相关并发症的比较。六年随访研究。
Clin Nutr. 2016 Aug;35(4):912-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
9
Comparison of peripherally inserted central catheters and totally implanted venous access devices as chemotherapy delivery routes in oncology patients: A retrospective cohort study.外周置入中心静脉导管与完全植入式静脉输液港在肿瘤患者化疗中的应用比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Sci Prog. 2021 Apr-Jun;104(2):368504211011871. doi: 10.1177/00368504211011871.
10
Comparative Complication Rates of 854 Central Venous Access Devices for Home Parenteral Nutrition in Cancer Patients: A Prospective Study of Over 169,000 Catheter-Days.854例癌症患者家庭肠外营养中心静脉通路装置的并发症发生率比较:一项超过169,000导管日的前瞻性研究。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2021 May;45(4):768-776. doi: 10.1002/jpen.1939. Epub 2020 Jul 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of totally implantable venous access ports on complications and quality of life in gastrointestinal cancer chemotherapy.全植入式静脉输液港对胃肠道癌化疗并发症及生活质量的影响
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Aug 27;17(8):109333. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.109333.
2
Use of central venous access devices outside of the pediatric intensive care units.儿科重症监护病房以外的中心静脉通路装置的使用。
Pediatr Res. 2025 Feb;97(2):664-670. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03337-7. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
3
Complications and its risk factors of percutaneous subclavian vein catheters in pediatric patients: enhancing the outcomes of a university hospital in a low-income and middle-income country.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of complications and short-term outcomes of percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion by conventional or modified Seldinger technique.评估传统或改良 Seldinger 技术经皮腹膜透析置管的并发症和短期结局。
Ren Fail. 2021 Dec;43(1):919-925. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2021.1925296.
2
Economic burden for retinoblastoma patients in China.中国视网膜母细胞瘤患者的经济负担。
J Med Econ. 2020 Dec;23(12):1553-1557. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1831518. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
3
Central venous catheter-related infections in hematology and oncology: 2020 updated guidelines on diagnosis, management, and prevention by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO).
儿科患者经皮锁骨下静脉置管的并发症及其危险因素:改善低收入和中等收入国家一家大学医院的治疗效果
World J Pediatr Surg. 2023 Feb 23;6(1):e000523. doi: 10.1136/wjps-2022-000523. eCollection 2023.
4
Mediport use as an acceptable standard for CAR T cell infusion.输液港可作为 CAR-T 细胞输注的可接受标准。
Front Immunol. 2023 Oct 27;14:1239132. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1239132. eCollection 2023.
5
Peripherally inserted central catheters can be an alternative to tunneled central venous catheters in chemotherapy for hematological and oncological pediatric patients.外周置入的中心静脉导管可作为血液肿瘤儿科患者化疗时替代隧道式中心静脉导管的选择。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Sep 6;39(1):264. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05545-4.
6
Peripherally inserted central catheters versus implantable port catheters for cancer patients: a meta-analysis.外周置入中心静脉导管与植入式端口导管用于癌症患者的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Front Oncol. 2023 Jul 14;13:1228092. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1228092. eCollection 2023.
7
Exploring risk factors for totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs)-related thrombotic occlusion in the off-treatment period.探讨治疗期结束后完全植入式静脉通路装置(TIVAD)相关血栓性闭塞的危险因素。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 4;13(1):10767. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37902-7.
血液学和肿瘤学相关的中心静脉导管感染:感染性疾病工作组(AGIHO)更新的诊断、管理和预防指南,由德国血液学和肿瘤学学会(DGHO)制定。
Ann Hematol. 2021 Jan;100(1):239-259. doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-04286-x. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
4
Totally implantable venous access ports: A prospective randomized study comparing subclavian and internal jugular vein punctures in children.完全植入式静脉输液港:一项对比儿童锁骨下静脉和颈内静脉穿刺的前瞻性随机研究。
J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Feb;56(2):317-323. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.04.021. Epub 2020 May 6.
5
Incidence and time trends of childhood cancer in Denmark, 1943-2014.丹麦 1943-2014 年儿童癌症发病情况及时间趋势。
Acta Oncol. 2020 May;59(5):588-595. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1725239. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
6
Peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) in outpatient and inpatient oncological treatment.外周静脉置入中心静脉导管(PICC)在门诊和住院肿瘤科治疗中的应用。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Oct;28(10):4753-4760. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05276-0. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
7
Childhood cancer incidence and survival trends in Estonia (1970-2016): a nationwide population-based study.爱沙尼亚儿童癌症发病率和生存趋势(1970-2016):一项全国性基于人群的研究。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jan 10;20(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6510-7.
8
Utility of totally implantable venous access ports in patients with breast cancer.全植入式静脉输液港在乳腺癌患者中的应用价值
Breast J. 2020 Feb;26(2):333-334. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13595. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
9
Clinical impact of peripherally inserted central catheters vs implanted port catheters in patients with cancer: an open-label, randomised, two-centre trial.外周置入中心静脉导管与植入式港静脉导管在癌症患者中的临床影响:一项开放标签、随机、两中心试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Jun;122(6):734-741. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.038. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
10
Study on the cost attributable to central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection and its influencing factors in a tertiary hospital in China.中国某三甲医院中心静脉导管相关血流感染的成本及影响因素研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Oct 11;16(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1027-3.