University of Münster.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Sep 1;36(9):1847-1863. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02204.
Prediction errors (PEs) function as learning signals. It is yet unclear how varying compared to repetitive PEs affect episodic memory in brain and behavior. The current study investigated cerebral and behavioral effects of experiencing either multiple alternative versions ("varying") or one single alternative version ("repetitive") of a previously encoded episode. Participants encoded a set of episodes ("originals") by watching videos showing toy stories. During scanning, participants either experienced originals, one single, or multiple alternative versions of the previously encoded episodes. Participants' memory performance was tested through recall of original objects. Varying and repetitive PEs revealed typical brain responses to the detection of mismatching information including inferior frontal and posterior parietal regions, as well as hippocampus, which is further linked to memory reactivation, and the amygdala, known for modulating memory consolidation. Furthermore, experiencing varying and repetitive PEs triggered distinct brain areas as revealed by direct contrast. Among others, experiencing varying versions triggered activity in the caudate, a region that has been associated with PEs. In contrast, repetitive PEs activated brain areas that resembled more those for retrieval of originally encoded episodes. Thus, ACC and posterior cingulate cortex activation seemed to serve both reactivating old and integrating new but similar information in episodic memory. Consistent with neural findings, participants recalled original objects less accurately when only presented with the same, but not varying, PE during fMRI. The current findings suggest that repeated PEs interact more strongly with a recalled original episodic memory than varying PEs.
预测误差 (PEs) 可作为学习信号。目前尚不清楚与重复 PEs 相比,不同的 PEs 如何影响大脑和行为中的情景记忆。本研究通过观察玩具故事视频来研究经历先前编码的情节的多个替代版本(“变化”)或一个单一替代版本(“重复”)时大脑和行为的影响。参与者通过观看视频来编码一系列情节(“原始情节”)。在扫描过程中,参与者经历了原始情节、一个单一的替代版本或之前编码情节的多个替代版本。参与者通过回忆原始物体来测试他们的记忆表现。变化的和重复的 PEs 揭示了对检测不匹配信息的典型大脑反应,包括额下回和顶后区,以及海马体,这与记忆再激活进一步相关,杏仁核,已知调节记忆巩固。此外,经历变化和重复的 PEs 触发了直接对比所揭示的不同的大脑区域。其中,经历变化的版本会引发尾状核的活动,尾状核与 PEs 有关。相比之下,重复的 PEs 激活了更类似于最初编码情节检索的大脑区域。因此,ACC 和后扣带皮层的激活似乎既可以重新激活旧信息,也可以整合情景记忆中的新但相似的信息。与神经发现一致,当 fMRI 期间仅呈现相同但不变化的 PEs 时,参与者对原始物体的回忆准确性较低。当前的研究结果表明,重复的 PEs 与回忆起的原始情景记忆的相互作用比变化的 PEs 更强。