Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Patient and Public Involvement, University of York, York, UK.
Trials. 2024 Jun 28;25(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08272-w.
Acute leukaemias (AL) are life-threatening blood cancers that can be potentially cured with treatment involving myelosuppressive, multiagent, intensive chemotherapy (IC). However, such treatment is associated with a risk of serious infection, in particular invasive fungal infection (IFI) associated with prolonged neutropenia. Current practice guidelines recommend primary antifungal (AF) prophylaxis to be administered to high-risk patients to reduce IFI incidence. AFs are also used empirically to manage prolonged neutropenic fever. Current strategies lead to substantial overuse of AFs. Galactomannan (GM) and β-D-glucan (BG) biomarkers are also used to diagnose IFI. Combining both biomarkers may enhance the predictability of IFI compared to administering each test alone. Currently, no large-scale randomised controlled trial (RCT) has directly compared a biomarker-based diagnostic screening strategy without AF prophylaxis to AF prophylaxis (without systematic biomarker testing).
BioDriveAFS is a multicentre, parallel, two-arm RCT of 404 participants from UK NHS Haematology departments. Participants will be allocated on a 1:1 basis to receive either a biomarker-based antifungal stewardship (AFS) strategy, or a prophylactic AF strategy, which includes existing standard of care (SoC). The co-primary outcomes will be AF exposure in the 12-month post randomisation and the patient-reported EQ-5D-5L measured at 12-month post randomisation. Secondary outcomes will include total AF exposure, probable/proven IFI, survival (all-cause mortality and IFI mortality), IFI treatment outcome, AF-associated adverse effects/events/complications, resource use, episodes of neutropenic fever requiring hospital admission or outpatient management, AF resistance in fungi (non-invasive and invasive) and a Desirability of Outcome Ranking. The trial will have an internal pilot phase during the first 9 months. A mixed methods process evaluation will be integrated in parallel to the internal pilot phase and full trial, aiming to robustly assess how the intervention is delivered. Cost-effectiveness analysis will also be performed.
The BioDriveAFS trial aims to further the knowledge of strategies that will safely optimise AF use through comparison of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a biomarker-led diagnostic strategy versus prophylactic AF to prevent and manage IFI within acute leukaemia. The evidence generated from the study will help inform global clinical practice and approaches within antifungal stewardship.
ISRCTN11633399. Registered 24/06/2022.
急性白血病(AL)是一种危及生命的血液癌,通过涉及骨髓抑制、多药物、强化化疗(IC)的治疗,有治愈的可能。然而,这种治疗与严重感染的风险相关,特别是与长时间中性粒细胞减少相关的侵袭性真菌感染(IFI)。目前的实践指南建议对高危患者进行预防性抗真菌(AF)治疗,以降低 IFI 的发生率。AF 也被经验性地用于治疗长时间的中性粒细胞减少性发热。目前的策略导致了 AF 的大量过度使用。半乳糖甘露聚糖(GM)和β-D-葡聚糖(BG)生物标志物也用于诊断 IFI。同时使用这两种生物标志物可能比单独使用每种测试更能提高 IFI 的预测性。目前,没有大规模的随机对照试验(RCT)直接比较过不使用 AF 预防的基于生物标志物的诊断筛查策略与 AF 预防(不进行系统的生物标志物检测)。
BioDriveAFS 是一项来自英国国民保健署血液学部门的 404 名参与者的多中心、平行、双臂 RCT。参与者将按照 1:1 的比例分配,接受基于生物标志物的抗真菌管理(AFS)策略或预防性 AF 策略,包括现有的标准护理(SoC)。主要结局将是随机分组后 12 个月内的 AF 暴露情况和随机分组后 12 个月时患者报告的 EQ-5D-5L。次要结局将包括总 AF 暴露量、可能/已证实的 IFI、生存率(全因死亡率和 IFI 死亡率)、IFI 治疗结局、AF 相关的不良影响/事件/并发症、资源使用、需要住院或门诊管理的中性粒细胞减少性发热发作、真菌(非侵袭性和侵袭性)中的 AF 耐药性以及结局偏好排序。该试验将在头 9 个月内进行内部试点阶段。混合方法过程评估将与内部试点阶段和完整试验同时进行,旨在稳健地评估干预措施的实施情况。还将进行成本效益分析。
BioDriveAFS 试验旨在通过比较基于生物标志物的诊断策略与预防性 AF 预防和管理急性白血病中的 IFI,进一步了解通过比较安全优化 AF 使用的策略,以提高临床和成本效益。该研究产生的证据将有助于为全球临床实践和抗真菌管理方法提供信息。
ISRCTN83301466。注册于 2022 年 6 月 24 日。