Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey.
Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Yeditepe University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Niger J Clin Pract. 2024 Jun 1;27(6):759-765. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_862_23. Epub 2024 Jun 29.
This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI) system employing deep learning for identifying dental plaque, utilizing a dataset comprising photographs of permanent teeth.
In this study, photographs of 168 teeth belonging to 20 patients aged between 10 and 15 years, who met our criteria, were included. Intraoral photographs were taken of the patients in two stages, before and after the application of the plaque staining agent. To train the AI system to identify plaque on teeth with dental plaque that is not discolored, plaque and teeth were marked on photos with exposed dental plaque. One hundred forty teeth were used to construct the training group, while 28 teeth were used to create the test group. Another dentist reviewed images of teeth with dental plaque that was not discolored, and the effectiveness of AI in detecting plaque was evaluated using pertinent performance indicators. To compare the AI model and the dentist's evaluation outcomes, the mean intersection over union (IoU) values were evaluated by the Wilcoxon test.
The AI system showed higher performance in our study with a precision of 82% accuracy, 84% sensitivity, 83% F1 score, 87% accuracy, and 89% specificity in plaque detection. The area under the curve (AUC) value was found to be 0.922, and the IoU value was 76%. Subsequently, the dentist's plaque diagnosis performance was also evaluated. The IoU value was 0.71, and the AUC was 0.833. The AI model showed statistically significantly higher performance than the dentist (P < 0.05).
The AI algorithm that we developed has achieved promising results and demonstrated clinically acceptable performance in detecting dental plaque compared to a dentist.
本研究旨在评估一种基于深度学习的人工智能(AI)系统识别牙菌斑的诊断准确性,该系统使用包含恒牙照片的数据集。
本研究纳入了符合标准的 20 名 10 至 15 岁患者的 168 颗牙齿的照片。在两个阶段对患者进行了口腔内照片拍摄,即在应用菌斑染色剂之前和之后。为了训练 AI 系统识别未变色的牙齿上的菌斑,在有暴露的菌斑的照片上标记菌斑和牙齿。140 颗牙齿用于构建训练组,28 颗牙齿用于创建测试组。另一位牙医对未变色的牙齿上的菌斑进行了图像复查,并使用相关性能指标评估 AI 在检测菌斑方面的有效性。为了比较 AI 模型和牙医的评估结果,使用 Wilcoxon 检验评估了平均交并比(IoU)值。
我们的研究表明,AI 系统表现出更高的性能,其在菌斑检测方面的准确率为 82%,灵敏度为 84%,F1 得分为 83%,准确率为 87%,特异性为 89%。曲线下面积(AUC)值为 0.922,IoU 值为 76%。随后,还评估了牙医的菌斑诊断性能。IoU 值为 0.71,AUC 为 0.833。AI 模型的表现明显优于牙医(P < 0.05)。
与牙医相比,我们开发的 AI 算法在检测牙菌斑方面取得了有前途的结果,并表现出临床可接受的性能。