• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于深度学习的乳牙菌斑检测:与临床评估的比较。

Deep learning-based dental plaque detection on primary teeth: a comparison with clinical assessments.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Digital Dentistry of Ministry of Health & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Beijing, 100081, China.

State Key Laboratory of Virtual Reality Technology and Systems, Beihang University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2020 May 13;20(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01114-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-020-01114-6
PMID:32404094
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7222297/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dental plaque causes many common oral diseases (e.g., caries, gingivitis, and periodontitis). Therefore, plaque detection and control are extremely important for children's oral health. The objectives of this study were to design a deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) model to detect plaque on primary teeth and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the model.

METHODS

A conventional neural network (CNN) framework was adopted, and 886 intraoral photos of primary teeth were used for training. To validate clinical feasibility, 98 intraoral photos of primary teeth were assessed by the AI model. Additionally, tooth photos were acquired using a digital camera. One experienced pediatric dentist examined the photos and marked the regions containing plaque. Then, a plaque-disclosing agent was applied, and the areas with plaque were identified. After 1 week, the dentist drew the plaque area on the 98 photos taken by the digital camera again to evaluate the consistency of manual diagnosis. Additionally, 102 intraoral photos of primary teeth were marked to denote the plaque areas obtained by the AI model and the dentist to evaluate the diagnostic capacity of each approach based on lower-resolution photos. The mean intersection-over-union (MIoU) metric was employed to indicate detection accuracy.

RESULTS

The MIoU for detecting plaque on the tested tooth photos was 0.726 ± 0.165. The dentist's MIoU was 0.695 ± 0.269 when first diagnosing the 98 photos taken by the digital camera and 0.689 ± 0.253 after 1 week. Compared to the dentist, the AI model demonstrated a higher MIoU (0.736 ± 0.174), and the results did not change after 1 week. When the dentist and the AI model assessed the 102 intraoral photos, the MIoU was 0.652 ± 0.195 for the dentist and 0.724 ± 0.159 for the model. The results of a paired t-test found no significant difference between the AI model and human specialist (P > .05) in diagnosing dental plaque on primary teeth.

CONCLUSIONS

The AI model showed clinically acceptable performance in detecting dental plaque on primary teeth compared with an experienced pediatric dentist. This finding illustrates the potential of such AI technology to help improve pediatric oral health.

摘要

背景

牙菌斑会导致许多常见的口腔疾病(例如龋齿、牙龈炎和牙周炎)。因此,菌斑的检测和控制对儿童的口腔健康至关重要。本研究旨在设计一种基于深度学习的人工智能(AI)模型来检测乳牙上的菌斑,并评估该模型的诊断准确性。

方法

采用传统的神经网络(CNN)框架,对 886 张乳牙的口腔内照片进行训练。为了验证临床可行性,使用 AI 模型对 98 张乳牙的口腔内照片进行了评估。此外,还使用数码相机获取了牙齿照片。一位经验丰富的儿科牙医检查了这些照片,并标记了含有菌斑的区域。然后,使用菌斑显色剂识别出有菌斑的区域。一周后,牙医再次在数码相机拍摄的 98 张照片上画出菌斑区域,以评估手动诊断的一致性。此外,还对 102 张乳牙的口腔内照片进行了标记,以表示 AI 模型和牙医识别的菌斑区域,从而评估两种方法基于低分辨率照片的诊断能力。采用平均交并比(MIoU)指标来表示检测准确性。

结果

在测试牙照片上检测菌斑的 MIoU 为 0.726±0.165。牙医在首次诊断数码相机拍摄的 98 张照片时的 MIoU 为 0.695±0.269,一周后为 0.689±0.253。与牙医相比,AI 模型的 MIoU 更高(0.736±0.174),且一周后结果不变。当牙医和 AI 模型评估 102 张口腔内照片时,牙医的 MIoU 为 0.652±0.195,模型的 MIoU 为 0.724±0.159。配对 t 检验的结果表明,AI 模型与口腔专科医生在诊断乳牙上的牙菌斑方面没有显著差异(P>.05)。

结论

与经验丰富的儿科牙医相比,AI 模型在检测乳牙上的牙菌斑方面表现出了临床可接受的性能。这一发现表明,这种 AI 技术有可能帮助改善儿童的口腔健康。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17bc/7222297/d4f2b440757a/12903_2020_1114_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17bc/7222297/fdb347d75cb1/12903_2020_1114_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17bc/7222297/89b5f24d3449/12903_2020_1114_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17bc/7222297/94b33e2c1579/12903_2020_1114_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17bc/7222297/d4f2b440757a/12903_2020_1114_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17bc/7222297/fdb347d75cb1/12903_2020_1114_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17bc/7222297/89b5f24d3449/12903_2020_1114_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17bc/7222297/94b33e2c1579/12903_2020_1114_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17bc/7222297/d4f2b440757a/12903_2020_1114_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Deep learning-based dental plaque detection on primary teeth: a comparison with clinical assessments.基于深度学习的乳牙菌斑检测:与临床评估的比较。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 May 13;20(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01114-6.
2
[Deep learning-based dental plaque detection on permanent teeth and the influenced factors].[基于深度学习的恒牙牙菌斑检测及其影响因素]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Jul 9;56(7):665-671. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20201014-00526.
3
Evaluation of Dental Plaque Area with Artificial Intelligence Model.人工智能模型评估牙菌斑面积。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2024 Jun 1;27(6):759-765. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_862_23. Epub 2024 Jun 29.
4
[Development of a deep learning based prototype artificial intelligence system for the detection of dental caries in children].[基于深度学习的儿童龋齿检测原型人工智能系统的开发]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Dec 9;56(12):1253-1260. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20210712-00323.
5
Simultaneous detection of dental caries and fissure sealant in intraoral photos by deep learning: a pilot study.基于深度学习的口腔内照片中龋齿和窝沟封闭剂的同时检测:一项初步研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 May 12;24(1):553. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04254-1.
6
AI-based dental caries and tooth number detection in intraoral photos: Model development and performance evaluation.基于人工智能的口腔内照片龋病和牙齿数检测:模型开发与性能评估。
J Dent. 2024 Feb;141:104821. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104821. Epub 2023 Dec 24.
7
Accuracy of pediatric primary care providers' screening and referral for early childhood caries.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿龋齿的筛查及转诊的准确性。
Pediatrics. 2002 May;109(5):E82-2. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.5.e82.
8
DeepPlaq: Dental plaque indexing based on deep neural networks.DeepPlaq:基于深度神经网络的牙菌斑索引。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Sep 20;28(10):534. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05921-x.
9
Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Based Photographic Detection of Gingivitis.基于人工智能的牙龈炎摄影检测的准确性。
Int Dent J. 2023 Oct;73(5):724-730. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2023.03.007. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
10
Tooth caries classification with quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) images using convolutional neural network for permanent teeth in vivo.利用卷积神经网络对活体恒牙进行定量光诱导荧光(QLF)图像的龋齿分类。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Dec 8;23(1):981. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03669-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Diagnosis and Treatment Plan Given by Pediatric Dentists and Generated by ChatGPT: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.儿科牙医给出的诊断和治疗方案与ChatGPT生成的诊断和治疗方案的比较评估:一项横断面试点研究。
Cureus. 2025 Jul 22;17(7):e88505. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88505. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
AI-driven approaches in the management of early childhood caries: A path toward global oral health.人工智能驱动的幼儿龋齿管理方法:通往全球口腔健康之路。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025 Sep-Oct;15(5):1134-1140. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.07.022. Epub 2025 Jul 29.
3
Deep learning for automated dental plaque index assessment: validation against expert evaluations.

本文引用的文献

1
A Mobile App (WhiteTeeth) to Promote Good Oral Health Behavior Among Dutch Adolescents with Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: Intervention Mapping Approach.一款促进荷兰佩戴固定正畸矫治器青少年良好口腔健康行为的移动应用程序(WhiteTeeth):干预映射方法。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Aug 17;6(8):e163. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9626.
2
Randomised controlled trial on differential learning of toothbrushing in 6- to 9-year-old children.6 至 9 岁儿童牙刷差异化学习的随机对照试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Jul;22(6):2219-2228. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2313-x. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
3
Association of caries experience and dental plaque with sociodemographic characteristics in elementary school-aged children: a cross-sectional study.
用于自动评估牙菌斑指数的深度学习:与专家评估的对比验证
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):1000. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06350-2.
4
Artificial Intelligence Tools in Dentistry: A Systematic Review on Their Application and Outcomes.牙科中的人工智能工具:关于其应用和结果的系统评价
Cureus. 2025 May 29;17(5):e85062. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85062. eCollection 2025 May.
5
Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Periodontology: A Scoping Review.人工智能在牙周病学中的临床应用:一项范围综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jun 10;61(6):1066. doi: 10.3390/medicina61061066.
6
Applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Diagnosis of Periodontal/Peri-Implant Diseases: A Narrative Review.人工智能在牙周/种植体周围疾病诊断中的应用:一篇叙述性综述。
J Oral Rehabil. 2025 Aug;52(8):1193-1219. doi: 10.1111/joor.14045. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
7
Automated periodontal assessment in orthodontic patients: a dual CNN framework.正畸患者的自动牙周评估:一种双卷积神经网络框架
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jun 2;29(6):328. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06410-5.
8
Deep-Learning-Based AI-Model for Predicting Dental Plaque in the Young Permanent Teeth of Children Aged 8-13 Years.基于深度学习的人工智能模型用于预测8至13岁儿童年轻恒牙中的牙菌斑
Children (Basel). 2025 Apr 7;12(4):475. doi: 10.3390/children12040475.
9
SegmentAnyTooth: An open-source deep learning framework for tooth enumeration and segmentation in intraoral photos.SegmentAnyTooth:用于口腔内照片中牙齿计数和分割的开源深度学习框架。
J Dent Sci. 2025 Apr;20(2):1110-1117. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2025.01.003. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
10
AI-Driven Detection and Measurement of Keratinized Gingiva in Dental Photographs: Validation Using Reference Retainers.人工智能驱动的牙科照片中角化牙龈的检测与测量:使用参考保持器进行验证
J Clin Periodontol. 2025 Jul;52(7):1056-1067. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.14164. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
小学适龄儿童龋齿经历和牙菌斑与社会人口学特征的关联:一项横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Jan 10;18(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0464-4.
4
Red fluorescence imaging for dental plaque detection and quantification: pilot study.用于牙菌斑检测和定量的红色荧光成像:初步研究。
J Biomed Opt. 2017 Sep;22(9):1-10. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.22.9.096008.
5
Comparison of red autofluorescing plaque and disclosed plaque-a cross-sectional study.红色自发荧光斑块与显示斑块的比较——一项横断面研究
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Dec;20(9):2551-2558. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1761-z. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
6
Detection and quantification of dental plaque based on laser-induced autofluorescence intensity ratio values.基于激光诱导自体荧光强度比值的牙菌斑检测与定量分析。
J Biomed Opt. 2015 Apr;20(4):048001. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.20.4.048001.
7
Dental plaque biofilms: communities, conflict and control.牙菌斑生物膜:群落、冲突与控制
Periodontol 2000. 2011 Feb;55(1):16-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2009.00339.x.
8
Professional brushing study comparing the effectiveness of sonic brush heads with manual toothbrushes: a single blinded, randomized clinical trial.专业刷牙研究比较声波刷头和手动牙刷的效果:一项单盲、随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Aug;15(4):451-60. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0411-0. Epub 2010 Apr 13.
9
Automated quantification of dental plaque accumulation using digital imaging.使用数字成像技术对牙菌斑堆积进行自动定量分析。
J Dent. 2004 Nov;32(8):623-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.06.006.
10
Comparative cleansing efficiency of manual and power brushing.手动刷牙与电动刷牙的清洁效率比较。
J Am Dent Assoc. 1962 Jul;65:26-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1962.0184.