Gao Yanjun, Yu Qiyao, Yang Huize, Zhang Jianguo, Wang Wei
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Safety Protection, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.
School of Metallurgical and Ecological Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China.
Adv Mater. 2024 Sep;36(39):e2405989. doi: 10.1002/adma.202405989. Epub 2024 Jun 29.
Cost-effectiveness plays a decisive role in sustainable operating of rechargeable batteries. As such, the low cost-consumption of sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) and potassium-ion batteries (PIBs) provides a promising direction for "how do SIBs/PIBs replace Li-ion batteries (LIBs) counterparts" based on their resource abundance and advanced electrochemical performance. To rationalize the SIBs/PIBs technologies as alternatives to LIBs from the unit energy cost perspective, this review gives the specific criteria for their energy density at possible electrode-price grades and various battery-longevity levels. The cost ($ kWh cycle) advantage of SIBs/PIBs is ascertained by the cheap raw-material compensation for the cycle performance deficiency and the energy density gap with LIBs. Furthermore, the cost comparison between SIBs and PIBs, especially on cost per kWh and per cycle, is also involved. This review explicitly manifests the practicability and cost-effectiveness toward SIBs are superior to PIBs whose commercialization has so far been hindered by low energy density. Even so, the huge potential on sustainability of PIBs, to outperform SIBs, as the mainstream energy storage technology is revealed as long as PIBs achieve long cycle life or enhanced energy density, the related outlook of which is proceeded as the next development directions for commercial applications.
成本效益在可充电电池的可持续运行中起着决定性作用。因此,钠离子电池(SIBs)和钾离子电池(PIBs)的低成本消耗,基于其资源丰富性和先进的电化学性能,为“如何让SIBs/PIBs取代锂离子电池(LIBs)同类产品”提供了一个有前景的方向。为了从单位能源成本的角度将SIBs/PIBs技术合理化为LIBs的替代品,本综述给出了在可能的电极价格等级和各种电池寿命水平下它们的能量密度的具体标准。SIBs/PIBs的成本(美元/千瓦时·循环)优势是通过廉价原材料对循环性能不足以及与LIBs的能量密度差距的补偿来确定的。此外,还涉及SIBs和PIBs之间的成本比较,特别是每千瓦时和每循环的成本比较。本综述明确表明,SIBs在实用性和成本效益方面优于PIBs,PIBs的商业化迄今为止一直受到低能量密度的阻碍。即便如此,只要PIBs实现长循环寿命或提高能量密度,PIBs作为主流储能技术在可持续性方面超越SIBs的巨大潜力就会显现出来,其相关展望作为商业应用的下一个发展方向展开。