Comparing scoring systems for Fournier gangrenes in predicting morbidity and mortality: Is FGSI still reliable?

INTRODUCTION

Compare scoring systems using Fournier gangrene severity index (FGSI), Uludag Fournier gangrene severity index (UFGSI), Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC), and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) to predict the outcome of patients with Fournier gangrene.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study that includes FG patients from 2012 to 2021. NLR, FGSI, UFGSI, and LRINEC values were calculated and analyzed. Each scoring system was analyzed using a receiver-operating curve (ROC) analysis to determine its sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.

RESULTS

A total of 158 patients were included in this study. Regarding the mortality outcome, FGSI comprised the highest value of AUC with 80.9, with a sensitivity of 91.7% and specificity of 68.5%. LRINEC comprised the AUC value of 61.1, with 79.2% sensitivity and 64.2% specificity. NLR comprised an AUC value of 63.7, 91.7% of sensitivity, and 98.1% of specificity. In terms of length of stay, LRINEC and NLR were associated as significant predictor.

CONCLUSION

FGSI, UFGSI, and NLR are significant predictors associated with mortality in patients with Fournier gangrene. FGSI and UFGSI comprised the highest sensitivity and specificity value in predicting mortality prognosis. Moreover, this study highlighted the role of NLR and LRINEC as significant predictors for the length of hospitalization. This study shows that FGSI is still a reliable scoring system for predicting mortality in patients with Fournier Gangrene.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.