• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用比较灭绝风险分析对 世界自然保护联盟濒危物种红色名录 中的两栖动物重新评估进行优先级排序。

Using comparative extinction risk analysis to prioritize the IUCN Red List reassessments of amphibians.

机构信息

Department of Biology and Biotechnologies "Charles Darwin", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Departamento de Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.

出版信息

Conserv Biol. 2024 Dec;38(6):e14316. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14316. Epub 2024 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1111/cobi.14316
PMID:38946355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11589027/
Abstract

Assessing the extinction risk of species based on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List (RL) is key to guiding conservation policies and reducing biodiversity loss. This process is resource demanding, however, and requires continuous updating, which becomes increasingly difficult as new species are added to the RL. Automatic methods, such as comparative analyses used to predict species RL category, can be an efficient alternative to keep assessments up to date. Using amphibians as a study group, we predicted which species are more likely to change their RL category and thus should be prioritized for reassessment. We used species biological traits, environmental variables, and proxies of climate and land-use change as predictors of RL category. We produced an ensemble prediction of IUCN RL category for each species by combining 4 different model algorithms: cumulative link models, phylogenetic generalized least squares, random forests, and neural networks. By comparing RL categories with the ensemble prediction and accounting for uncertainty among model algorithms, we identified species that should be prioritized for future reassessment based on the mismatch between predicted and observed values. The most important predicting variables across models were species' range size and spatial configuration of the range, biological traits, climate change, and land-use change. We compared our proposed prioritization index and the predicted RL changes with independent IUCN RL reassessments and found high performance of both the prioritization and the predicted directionality of changes in RL categories. Ensemble modeling of RL category is a promising tool for prioritizing species for reassessment while accounting for models' uncertainty. This approach is broadly applicable to all taxa on the IUCN RL and to regional and national assessments and may improve allocation of the limited human and economic resources available to maintain an up-to-date IUCN RL.

摘要

基于国际自然保护联盟 (IUCN) 红色名录 (RL) 评估物种的灭绝风险是指导保护政策和减少生物多样性丧失的关键。然而,这个过程需要大量资源,并且需要不断更新,随着新物种被添加到 RL 中,更新变得越来越困难。自动方法,例如用于预测物种 RL 类别的比较分析,可以作为保持评估最新的有效替代方法。我们选择两栖动物作为研究群体,预测哪些物种更有可能改变其 RL 类别,从而应优先进行重新评估。我们使用物种的生物特征、环境变量以及气候和土地利用变化的代理作为 RL 类别的预测因子。我们通过结合 4 种不同的模型算法:累积链接模型、系统发育广义最小二乘法、随机森林和神经网络,为每个物种生成了 IUCN RL 类别的综合预测。通过将 RL 类别与综合预测进行比较,并考虑模型算法之间的不确定性,我们根据预测值和观察值之间的不匹配,确定了应优先进行未来重新评估的物种。跨模型最重要的预测变量是物种的范围大小和范围的空间配置、生物特征、气候变化和土地利用变化。我们将我们提出的优先级指数和 RL 类别变化的预测与独立的 IUCN RL 重新评估进行了比较,发现这两种方法的优先级和 RL 类别变化的预测方向都具有很高的性能。RL 类别综合建模是一种有前途的工具,可用于在考虑模型不确定性的情况下优先对物种进行重新评估。这种方法广泛适用于 IUCN RL 上的所有分类群以及区域和国家评估,并可能改善用于维持最新 IUCN RL 的有限人力和经济资源的分配。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22df/11589027/0173204cb9d6/COBI-38-e14316-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22df/11589027/c0c06204a67d/COBI-38-e14316-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22df/11589027/0860ed0dde5c/COBI-38-e14316-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22df/11589027/35d3591963ed/COBI-38-e14316-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22df/11589027/aa49859f289d/COBI-38-e14316-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22df/11589027/60008cc35438/COBI-38-e14316-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22df/11589027/0173204cb9d6/COBI-38-e14316-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22df/11589027/c0c06204a67d/COBI-38-e14316-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22df/11589027/0860ed0dde5c/COBI-38-e14316-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22df/11589027/35d3591963ed/COBI-38-e14316-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22df/11589027/aa49859f289d/COBI-38-e14316-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22df/11589027/60008cc35438/COBI-38-e14316-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22df/11589027/0173204cb9d6/COBI-38-e14316-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Using comparative extinction risk analysis to prioritize the IUCN Red List reassessments of amphibians.利用比较灭绝风险分析对 世界自然保护联盟濒危物种红色名录 中的两栖动物重新评估进行优先级排序。
Conserv Biol. 2024 Dec;38(6):e14316. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14316. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
2
A standard approach for including climate change responses in IUCN Red List assessments.将气候变化应对纳入 IUCN 红色名录评估的标准方法。
Conserv Biol. 2024 Jun;38(3):e14227. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14227. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
3
Prioritizing the reassessment of data-deficient species on the IUCN Red List.优先对 IUCN 红色名录中数据缺乏的物种进行重新评估。
Conserv Biol. 2023 Dec;37(6):e14139. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14139. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
4
Incorporating citizen science into IUCN Red List assessments.将公民科学纳入世界自然保护联盟濒危物种红色名录评估。
Conserv Biol. 2025 Apr;39(2):e14329. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14329. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
5
Applying habitat and population-density models to land-cover time series to inform IUCN Red List assessments.应用栖息地和种群密度模型对土地覆盖时间序列进行分析,为 IUCN 红色名录评估提供信息。
Conserv Biol. 2019 Oct;33(5):1084-1093. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13279. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
6
Patterns and biases of climate change threats in the IUCN Red List.《IUCN 红色名录中气候变化威胁的模式和偏见》
Conserv Biol. 2018 Feb;32(1):135-147. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13022. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
7
Combined effects of life-history traits and human impact on extinction risk of freshwater megafauna.生命史特征和人类活动对淡水巨型动物灭绝风险的综合影响。
Conserv Biol. 2021 Apr;35(2):643-653. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13590. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
8
Modelling the probability of meeting IUCN Red List criteria to support reassessments.建立模型以预测满足 IUCN 红色名录标准的概率,以支持重新评估。
Glob Chang Biol. 2024 Jan;30(1):e17119. doi: 10.1111/gcb.17119.
9
Toward reassessing data-deficient species.迈向重新评估数据缺乏的物种。
Conserv Biol. 2017 Jun;31(3):531-539. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12850. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
10
Extinction risk of the endemic vascular flora of Kauai, Hawaii, based on IUCN assessments.基于 IUCN 评估的夏威夷考艾岛特有维管束植物的灭绝风险。
Conserv Biol. 2022 Aug;36(4):e13896. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13896. Epub 2022 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
NewtCap: An Efficient Target Capture Approach to Boost Genomic Studies in Salamandridae (True Salamanders and Newts).新蝾螈捕获法:一种促进蝾螈科(真蝾螈和蝾螈)基因组研究的高效目标捕获方法。
Ecol Evol. 2025 Aug 12;15(8):e71835. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71835. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Can Macroevolution Inform Contemporary Extinction Risk?宏观进化能为当代灭绝风险提供信息吗?
Ecol Lett. 2025 Jul;28(7):e70171. doi: 10.1111/ele.70171.