• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何帮助国家在大流行期间提高韧性:快速交流论坛的一个例子。

How to help countries improve resilience during a pandemic: an example of a Rapid Exchange Forum.

机构信息

International Affairs, Policy, Evaluation and Digitialisation, Gesundheit Österreich GmbH, Vienna, Austria.

EU Health Information System Department, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2024 Jul 1;34(Supplement_1):i81-i86. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae035.

DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckae035
PMID:38946451
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11215321/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic demanded quick exchanges between experts and institutions supporting governments to provide evidence-based information in response to the crisis. Initially, there was no regular cross-country forum in the field of population health. This paper describes the set-up and benefits of implementing such a forum.

METHODS

A group of public health practitioners from academia, national public health institutes and ministries of health decided in April 2020 to meet bi-monthly to discuss a vast array of population health topics in a structured format called a Rapid Exchange Forum (REF). An ad-hoc mailing group was established to collect responses to questions brought forward in the forum from at least five countries within 24 h. This endeavour, which evolved as network of networks was awarded an EU grant in autumn 2020 and was called PHIRI (Population Health Information Research Infrastructure).

RESULTS

Responses from up to 31 countries were compiled and shared immediately via the European Health Information Portal. This exchange was complemented by special REFs that focused on the advantages and disadvantages of vaccination, for example. By July 2023, 54 REFs had taken place with topics going beyond COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

The REF demonstrated its value for quick yet evidence-based cross-country exchange in times of crisis and was highly appreciated by countries and European Commission. It demonstrated its sustainability even after the acute crisis by expanding the topics covered and managing to continue exchange with the aim of capacity building and mutual learning, making it a true EU response and coordination mechanism.

摘要

背景

COVID-19 大流行要求专家和支持政府的机构之间迅速交流,以便提供基于证据的信息来应对危机。最初,在人口健康领域没有定期的跨国论坛。本文介绍了设立和实施此类论坛的好处。

方法

2020 年 4 月,一群来自学术界、国家公共卫生研究所和卫生部的公共卫生从业者决定每两个月举行一次会议,以结构化的形式讨论广泛的人口健康主题,这种形式称为快速交流论坛(REF)。成立了一个特别的邮件组,在 24 小时内从至少五个国家收集论坛上提出的问题的答复。这项工作发展成为一个网络,于 2020 年秋季获得欧盟赠款,并被称为 PHIRI(人口健康信息研究基础设施)。

结果

来自多达 31 个国家的答复被汇编并立即通过欧洲卫生信息门户共享。这种交流还通过特别的 REF 得到补充,例如,重点讨论接种疫苗的优缺点。截至 2023 年 7 月,已经举行了 54 次 REF,主题不仅限于 COVID-19。

结论

REF 证明了其在危机时期快速进行基于证据的跨国交流的价值,受到了各国和欧盟委员会的高度赞赏。它通过扩大涵盖的主题并努力继续交流以实现能力建设和相互学习,证明了其可持续性,即使在急性危机之后,这使其成为真正的欧盟应对和协调机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53b7/11215321/85e97dbc1fd8/ckae035f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53b7/11215321/831e43941832/ckae035f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53b7/11215321/52e07206cda8/ckae035f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53b7/11215321/b79bf3f8232d/ckae035f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53b7/11215321/85e97dbc1fd8/ckae035f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53b7/11215321/831e43941832/ckae035f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53b7/11215321/52e07206cda8/ckae035f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53b7/11215321/b79bf3f8232d/ckae035f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53b7/11215321/85e97dbc1fd8/ckae035f4.jpg

相似文献

1
How to help countries improve resilience during a pandemic: an example of a Rapid Exchange Forum.如何帮助国家在大流行期间提高韧性:快速交流论坛的一个例子。
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Jul 1;34(Supplement_1):i81-i86. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae035.
2
European Health Information Portal: a one-stop shop for health information.欧洲健康信息门户:一站式健康信息服务。
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Jul 1;34(Supplement_1):i29-i34. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad172.
3
The European Union and Public Health Emergencies: Expert Opinions on the Management of the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Suggestions for Future Emergencies.欧盟与公共卫生紧急事件:应对 COVID-19 大流行第一波疫情的管理专家意见及对未来紧急事件的建议。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 20;9:698995. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.698995. eCollection 2021.
4
Impacts of public health and social measures on COVID-19 in Europe: a review and modified Delphi technique.公共卫生和社会措施对欧洲 COVID-19 的影响:综述和改良德尔菲技术。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 31;11:1226922. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1226922. eCollection 2023.
5
BBMRI-ERIC's contributions to research and knowledge exchange on COVID-19.BBMRI-ERIC 对 COVID-19 研究和知识交流的贡献。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Jun;28(6):728-731. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-0634-8. Epub 2020 May 22.
6
Educational Initiative about the COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Neuropsychiatry for Early Career Professionals in EU: The Impact of the Novel Virus on Brain, Mind, and Society.面向欧盟早期职业专业人员的关于 COVID-19 大流行相关神经精神病学的教育倡议:新型病毒对大脑、心理和社会的影响。
Psychiatr Danub. 2022 Sep;34(Suppl 8):164-169.
7
Perspective: Lessons from COVID-19 of countries in the European region in light of findings from the health system response monitor.观点:从卫生系统应对监测中获得的结果,来看欧洲区域各国在 COVID-19 方面的经验教训。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 6;10:1058729. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1058729. eCollection 2022.
8
[Expert committees in German public health policymaking during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a document analysis].[新冠疫情期间德国公共卫生政策制定中的专家委员会:文献分析]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2021 Oct;165:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2021.06.002. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
9
The COVID-19 pandemic: broad partnerships for the rapid scale up of innovative virtual approaches for capacity building and credible information dissemination in Africa.COVID-19 大流行:广泛的伙伴关系,为在非洲快速扩大创新虚拟方法以进行能力建设和可信信息传播提供支持。
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Nov 19;37:255. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2020.37.255.23787. eCollection 2020.
10
Capacity-building during public health emergencies: perceived usefulness and cost savings of an online training on SARS-CoV-2 real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) diagnostics in low- and middle-income settings during the COVID-19 pandemic.突发公共卫生事件中的能力建设:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,针对中低收入国家/地区的 SARS-CoV-2 实时聚合酶链反应(qPCR)诊断的在线培训在感知有用性和节省成本方面的效果。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 7;12:1197729. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1197729. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards a European health information system: The BRIDGE Health, InfAct and PHIRI projects.迈向欧洲健康信息系统:BRIDGE Health、InfAct和PHIRI项目。
J Health Monit. 2024 Dec 11;9(4):e12943. doi: 10.25646/12943. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Spillover effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on attitudes to influenza and childhood vaccines.COVID-19 大流行对流感和儿童疫苗态度的溢出效应。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 25;23(1):764. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15653-4.
2
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in eight European countries: Prevalence, determinants, and heterogeneity.八个欧洲国家对新冠疫苗的犹豫态度:流行情况、决定因素及异质性
Sci Adv. 2022 Apr 29;8(17):eabm9825. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abm9825. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
3
Coronavirus vaccine hesitancy among unvaccinated Austrians: Assessing underlying motivations and the effectiveness of interventions based on a cross-sectional survey with two embedded conjoint experiments.
奥地利未接种新冠疫苗者对疫苗的犹豫态度:基于一项包含两个嵌入式联合实验的横断面调查评估潜在动机及干预措施的有效性
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Jun;17:100389. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100389. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
4
Vaccine hesitancy in the era of COVID-19: could lessons from the past help in divining the future?新冠疫情时代的疫苗犹豫:过去的经验能否帮助预测未来?
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Dec 31;18(1):1-3. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1893062. Epub 2021 Mar 8.