Tseng Eva, Marsteller Jill A, Clark Jeanne M, Maruthur Nisa M
medRxiv. 2024 Jun 12:2024.06.10.24308653. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.10.24308653.
Prediabetes, a high-risk state for developing diabetes, affects more than 1 in 3 adults nationally. However, <5% of people with prediabetes are receiving any treatment for prediabetes. Prior intervention studies for increasing prediabetes treatment uptake have largely focused on individual barriers with few multi-level interventions that address clinician- and system-level barriers.
To measure the effectiveness of a multi-level intervention on uptake of prediabetes treatment in a primary care clinic.
Pragmatic study of the START (Screen, Test, Act, Refer and Treat) Diabetes Prevention intervention.
The START Diabetes Prevention intervention was implemented in a suburban primary care clinic outside of Baltimore compared to a control clinic in the same area over a 12-month period.
START Diabetes Prevention intervention included a structured workflow, shared decision-making resources and electronic health record clinical decision support tools.
Uptake of prediabetes treatment, defined as Diabetes Prevention Program referral, metformin prescription and/or medical nutrition referral within 30 days of any PCC visit.
We demonstrated greater uptake of preventive treatment among patients with prediabetes in the intervention clinic vs. control clinic receiving usual care (11.6% vs. 6.7%, p<0.001). More patients in the intervention vs. control clinic reported their PCC discussed prediabetes with them (60% vs. 48%, p=0.002) and more felt overall that they understood what their doctor was telling them about prediabetes and that their opinion was valued. The START Diabetes Prevention Strategy had greater acceptability and usefulness to PCCs at the study end compared to baseline.
A low-touch multi-level intervention is effective in increasing prediabetes treatment uptake. The intervention was also acceptable and feasible for clinicians, and enhanced patient understanding and discussions of prediabetes with their clinicians.
糖尿病前期是发展为糖尿病的高危状态,在全国超过三分之一的成年人中存在。然而,只有不到5%的糖尿病前期患者正在接受针对糖尿病前期的任何治疗。先前关于提高糖尿病前期治疗接受率的干预研究主要集中在个体障碍上,很少有针对临床医生和系统层面障碍的多层次干预措施。
评估一项多层次干预措施对初级保健诊所中糖尿病前期治疗接受率的效果。
对START(筛查、检测、行动、转诊和治疗)糖尿病预防干预措施的实用性研究。
在巴尔的摩郊外的一家郊区初级保健诊所实施START糖尿病预防干预措施,并与同一地区的一家对照诊所进行为期12个月的对比。
START糖尿病预防干预措施包括结构化工作流程、共同决策资源和电子健康记录临床决策支持工具。
糖尿病前期治疗的接受率,定义为在任何初级保健就诊后30天内转诊至糖尿病预防计划、开具二甲双胍处方和/或进行医学营养转诊。
我们证明,与接受常规护理的对照诊所相比,干预诊所中糖尿病前期患者接受预防性治疗的比例更高(11.6%对6.7%,p<0.001)。与对照诊所相比,干预诊所中有更多患者报告其初级保健医生与他们讨论了糖尿病前期(60%对48%,p=0.002),并且更多患者总体上感觉他们理解医生关于糖尿病前期的告知内容,并且他们的意见得到重视。与基线相比,在研究结束时,START糖尿病预防策略对初级保健医生具有更高的可接受性和实用性。
一种低接触的多层次干预措施在提高糖尿病前期治疗接受率方面是有效的。该干预措施对临床医生来说也是可接受且可行的,并增强了患者对糖尿病前期的理解以及与临床医生的讨论。