Malekmohammadi Maryam, Koutroumpa Konstantina, Crespo Manuel B, Domina Gianniantonio, Korotkova Nadja, Akhani Hossein, von Mering Sabine, Borsch Thomas, Berendsohn Walter G
Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Straße 6-8, 14195 Berlin, Germany Freie Universität Berlin Berlin Germany.
Halophytes and C4 Plants Research Laboratory, Department of Plant Sciences, School of Biology, College of Sciences, University of Tehran, P.O. Box 14155-6455, Tehran, Iran University of Tehran Tehran Iran.
PhytoKeys. 2024 Jun 20;243:67-103. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.243.122784. eCollection 2024.
A taxonomic backbone of the Plumbaginaceae is presented and the current state of knowledge on phylogenetic relationships and taxon limits is reviewed as a basis for the accepted taxon concepts. In total, 4,476 scientific names and designations are treated of which 30 are not in the family Plumbaginaceae. The Plumbaginaceae are subdivided in three tribes with 26 genera and 1,179 accepted species. Two subgenera, 17 sections, two subsections and 187 infraspecific taxa are accepted. At the species and infraspecific level 2,782 synonyms were assigned to accepted taxa, whereas 194 names were excluded from the core checklist (i.e., unplaced taxa, infrageneric subdivisions with still uncertain application, names of verified uncertain application, invalid horticultural names, excluded names from other families, other excluded designations, and unresolved names). The EDIT Platform for Cybertaxonomy was utilized as the tool to compile and manage the names and further taxonomic data under explicit taxon concepts. Secundum references are given in case taxon concepts were taken from the literature, whereas this study serves as reference for newly circumscribed taxa. The family's division into the tribes Aegialitideae, Limonieae, and Plumbagineae departs from earlier two-subfamily classifications, prompted by recent phylogenetic findings that challenge the subfamilial affinity of . The genus was extended to include , as currently available phylogenetic and morphological data support this merger. In , all accepted species could be assigned to sections and subsections or the "Mediterranean lineage", respectively, making use of the phylogenetic distribution of their morphological characters and states. A new combination and/or status is proposed for , , , , and Limoniumsect.Jovibarba. Special attention is given to nomenclatural issues, particularly for to resolve the names under accepted names. The use of artificial groupings like "aggregates", "complexes" and "species groups" in alpha-taxonomic treatments is discussed. The taxonomic backbone will receive continued updates and through the Caryophyllales Taxonomic Expert Network, it contributes the treatment of the Plumbaginaceae for the World Flora Online.
本文给出了蓝雪科的分类框架，并综述了系统发育关系和分类群界限的当前知识状态，作为公认分类群概念的基础。总共处理了4476个学名和名称，其中30个不属于蓝雪科。蓝雪科分为三个族，有26个属和1179个公认物种。接受了两个亚属、17个组、两个亚组和187个种下分类群。在物种和种下水平上，2782个同义词被归入公认分类群，而194个名称被排除在核心名录之外（即未定位分类群、应用仍不确定的属内细分、经核实应用不确定的名称、无效园艺名称、其他科的排除名称、其他排除的名称以及未解决的名称）。利用网络分类学编辑平台作为工具，在明确的分类群概念下编纂和管理名称及进一步的分类数据。如果分类群概念取自文献，则给出相应参考文献，而本研究作为新界定分类群的参考文献。该科分为海石竹族、补血草族和蓝雪花族，这与早期的二亚科分类不同，这是由最近的系统发育研究结果推动的，这些结果对……的亚科亲缘关系提出了挑战。……属被扩展以包括……，因为目前可用的系统发育和形态学数据支持这一合并。在……中，所有公认物种可以分别归入组和亚组或“地中海谱系”，这是利用了它们形态特征和状态的系统发育分布。为……、……、……、……和补血草属组Jovibarba提出了新的组合和/或状态。特别关注命名问题，尤其是对于……以解决公认名称下的名称问题。讨论了在α分类处理中使用“聚合体”、“复合体”和“物种组”等人为分组的情况。该分类框架将持续更新，并通过石竹目分类学专家网络，为《世界植物志在线》中蓝雪科的处理做出贡献。
