• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者参与涉及远程评估研究药物依从性产品的临床试验的体验。

Patients' experiences of clinical trial participation involving a product remotely assessing study drug adherence.

作者信息

Henriksson Catrin, Olsson Anneli, Andersen Kasper, Arefalk Gabriel, Erlinge David, Hofmann Robin, Ridderstråle Wilhelm, Rutgersson Annika, Oldgren Jonas, James Stefan

机构信息

Cardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Cardiology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 May 13;40:101307. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101307. eCollection 2024 Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101307
PMID:38947982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11214196/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The participation of patients in clinical trials is crucial for the development of healthcare. There are several challenges in the recruitment of trial participants with acute medical conditions. The registry-based randomized DAPA-MI clinical trial recruited patients during hospitalization for myocardial infarction and provided study drugs in bottles with smart caps that used wireless technology to transmit monitoring data. This interview study aimed to investigate patients' experience of participation in a clinical trial and their attitude to the new bottle cap technology.

METHODS

A subset of patients participating in the DAPA-MI trial were recruited from four hospitals in Sweden. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed using manifest content analysis.

RESULTS

Video interviews were performed including 21 patients (four women and 17 men). The median age was 59 years (range 44-80). Four categories of patients' experiences were identified. consisted of patients' positive attitudes to participation and to be a part of development and research. emphasized the value of the oral information as well as the importance of time for reflection. highlighted the impaired ability to perceive and remember in the acute medical condition. described the overall positive experiences of the smart bottle cap to evaluate adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' experiences of trial participation were in general positive but some challenges in the acute setting of a myocardial infarction were revealed. The smart bottle cap was well accepted, despite some handling difficulties.

摘要

背景

患者参与临床试验对医疗保健的发展至关重要。招募患有急性疾病的试验参与者存在若干挑战。基于登记处的随机DAPA-MI临床试验在患者因心肌梗死住院期间招募患者,并在装有智能瓶盖的瓶子中提供研究药物,智能瓶盖使用无线技术传输监测数据。这项访谈研究旨在调查患者参与临床试验的体验以及他们对新瓶盖技术的态度。

方法

从瑞典的四家医院招募了一部分参与DAPA-MI试验的患者。进行了半结构化访谈,并使用显性内容分析法进行分析。

结果

进行了视频访谈,包括21名患者(4名女性和17名男性)。中位年龄为59岁(范围44-80岁)。确定了四类患者体验。包括患者对参与以及成为发展和研究一部分的积极态度。强调了口头信息的价值以及反思时间的重要性。突出了急性疾病状态下感知和记忆能力受损的情况。描述了智能瓶盖在评估依从性方面的总体积极体验。

结论

患者参与试验的体验总体上是积极的,但在心肌梗死的急性情况下也发现了一些挑战。尽管存在一些操作困难,但智能瓶盖还是得到了很好的接受。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f91b/11214196/b0d09b0b352b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f91b/11214196/e43961749613/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f91b/11214196/b0d09b0b352b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f91b/11214196/e43961749613/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f91b/11214196/b0d09b0b352b/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Patients' experiences of clinical trial participation involving a product remotely assessing study drug adherence.患者参与涉及远程评估研究药物依从性产品的临床试验的体验。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 May 13;40:101307. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101307. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Patients' Perspectives on Transforming Clinical Trial Participation: Large Online Vignette-based Survey.患者对临床试验参与方式转变的看法:基于大型在线情景模拟的调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 1;24(2):e29691. doi: 10.2196/29691.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Testing the efficacy and safety of BIO101, for the prevention of respiratory deterioration, in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (COVA study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.评估 BIO101 预防 COVID-19 肺炎患者呼吸恶化的疗效和安全性(COVA 研究):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 11;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04998-5.
5
A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, crossover trial to investigate the effect of a wearable device in addition to a daily symptom diary for the Remote Early Detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections (COVID-RED): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、交叉试验,旨在研究可穿戴设备对 SARS-CoV-2 感染(COVID-RED)的远程早期检测的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Oct 11;22(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05643-5.
6
Medication adherence for atrial fibrillation patients: triangulating measures from a smart pill bottle, e-prescribing software, and patient communication through the electronic health record.房颤患者的药物依从性:综合智能药瓶、电子处方软件以及通过电子健康记录进行的患者沟通这三方面的措施。
JAMIA Open. 2020 Apr 28;3(2):233-242. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa007. eCollection 2020 Jul.
7
Facilitating trial recruitment: A qualitative study of patient and staff experiences of an orthopaedic trauma trial.促进试验招募:一项关于骨科创伤试验中患者和工作人员经验的定性研究。
Trials. 2019 Aug 9;20(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3597-8.
8
Patient and healthcare professional experiences of the Salford Lung Studies: qualitative insights for future effectiveness trials.患者和医疗保健专业人员对索尔福德肺部研究的体验:对未来有效性试验的定性洞察。
Trials. 2020 Sep 17;21(1):798. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04655-x.
9
Patient, Relative and Staff Experiences of Clinical Trial Participation in Neurooncology: "Maybe You Can Also Show the Positive, No Matter How It Ends".神经肿瘤学临床试验中患者、家属及工作人员的参与体验:“无论结局如何,或许你也能展现积极的一面”
Cancer Manag Res. 2024 Jun 21;16:663-676. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S447407. eCollection 2024.
10
Using action research and a community-academic partnership to understand clinical trial participation: a patient-centered perspective.运用行动研究和社区-学术伙伴关系来理解临床试验参与情况:以患者为中心的视角。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jun 13;10(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00593-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Dapagliflozin in Myocardial Infarction without Diabetes or Heart Failure.达格列净与糖尿病或心力衰竭无关的心肌梗死。
NEJM Evid. 2024 Feb;3(2):EVIDoa2300286. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2300286. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
2
Rationale and design of the DAPA-MI trial: Dapagliflozin in patients without diabetes mellitus with acute myocardial infarction.DAPA-MI 试验的原理和设计:达格列净在无糖尿病急性心肌梗死患者中的应用。
Am Heart J. 2023 Dec;266:188-197. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.08.008. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
3
Methodological approaches for conducting follow-up research with clinical trial participants: a scoping review and expert interviews.
方法学方法在临床试验参与者的随访研究中的应用:综述和专家访谈。
Trials. 2021 Dec 27;22(1):961. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05866-6.
4
Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响医疗保健领域随机试验招募的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 7;10(10):MR000045. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000045.pub2.
5
Patient experience of the informed consent process during acute myocardial infarction: a sub-study of the VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART trial.急性心肌梗死患者在知情同意过程中的体验:VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART 试验的子研究。
Trials. 2020 Mar 6;21(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4147-0.
6
Attitudes and considerations of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction toward participation in randomized clinical trials.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者参与随机临床试验的态度及考量
Am Heart J. 2019 Feb;208:21-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.10.011. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
7
Impact of patient and public involvement on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: systematic review and meta-analysis.患者和公众参与对临床试验入组和保留的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2018 Nov 28;363:k4738. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4738.
8
Clinical trials from the patient perspective: survey in an online patient community.从患者角度看临床试验:在线患者社区调查
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 27;17(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2090-x.
9
Patients' views of consent in clinical trials for acute myocardial infarction: impact of trial design.患者对急性心肌梗死临床试验中知情同意的看法:试验设计的影响。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Aug;43(8):524-529. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103866. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
10
Patients' views of consent for research enrollment during acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死患者对研究入组同意的看法。
Acute Card Care. 2015 Mar;17(1):1-4. doi: 10.3109/17482941.2014.994642. Epub 2015 Jan 2.