Kumar Ankit, Pushkar Kumar, Mathur Yashvir, Kumar Ravi, Patnaik Uma, Ahmed F H M, Yendamuri Sushma, Dawra Saurabh
Department of Medicine, Military Hospital, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Command Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 May;13(5):1636-1642. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_57_23. Epub 2024 May 24.
Recent disease resurgence in China indicates that corona virus infectious disease is still a pertinent public health problem. We stand at a juncture where we are still unsure about the initial dilemmas regarding its birth, therapies, and the emerging novel strains. Medical literature has focused on the clinical, laboratory, radiological, and therapeutic aspects of disease management. There is paucity of literature on the association between socio-demographic variables on disease severity and clinical outcome.
This retrospective observational study analyzing the socio-demographic variables was performed at a dedicated COVID care center in western Maharashtra, India. Electronic records of all individuals who were admitted to this hospital from July 29 2020, to June 14, 2021, and diagnosed COVID-19 positive by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were identified after due institutional ethical clearance. Patients admitted from July 29, 2020, to February 27, 2021, were categorized as patients presenting during the 'first wave of viral pandemic'. Those admitted from March 01, 2021, to June 14, 2021, have been included as patients admitted during 'second wave of viral pandemic'. The following outcome parameters were collected (presenting symptoms, duration of symptoms before the individual presented for diagnostic RT-PCR, total duration of symptoms, severity of disease at onset, duration of hospital stay, the final outcome (discharge/death) and Charlson's comorbidity index). The linear regression model was used to establish association between socio-demographic factors and disease severity at onset (mild/moderate/severe/critical).
A total of 37033 patients were screened, and the positivity rate with RT-PCR was 16.99% ( = 6275) during the study period. Out of which 45% ( = 2824) of the patients had mild disease requiring home isolation and the remaining 55% of patients required admission. 1590 patients from the first wave and 910 from the second wave of COVID-19 were hospitalized and included in the study after exclusion. The mean age of patients in first wave was 49 years and that in second wave was 54 years with 77.6% and 70.6% males in two waves, respectively. The burden of critical cases was higher in second wave as computed to first wave (10% vs 8%). The second wave had more outreach in the rural population as compared to second one (17.8% vs 12.2%). The mean duration from the onset of symptoms to hospitalization was 03 and 04 days, respectively, in two waves. Mortality associated in two waves was 11.9% and 24%, respectively ( < 0.05). Higher Charlson's comorbidity index was associated with higher mortality, and the cumulative survival from urban area was more as compared to the rural population (log rank - 9.148, = 0.0002).
The second COVID-19 wave had significantly higher case mortality. It affected elderly patients and those with rural background. The factors associated with higher mortality during COVID-19 pandemic were rural background, higher Charlson's comorbidity index and late presentation to the hospital. Ongoing vaccine campaigns, thus, should focus on rural areas and individuals with comorbidities especially in developing and least developed countries.
近期中国疾病的再次流行表明冠状病毒传染病仍是一个相关的公共卫生问题。我们正处于一个关键节点,对于其起源、治疗方法以及新出现的毒株等初始难题仍不确定。医学文献主要聚焦于疾病管理的临床、实验室、放射学和治疗方面。关于社会人口统计学变量与疾病严重程度及临床结局之间的关联,相关文献较少。
这项分析社会人口统计学变量的回顾性观察研究在印度马哈拉施特拉邦西部的一家专门的新冠护理中心进行。在获得机构伦理批准后,确定了2020年7月29日至2021年6月14日期间入住该医院并通过逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)诊断为新冠病毒阳性的所有个体的电子记录。2020年7月29日至2021年2月27日期间入院的患者被归类为“第一波病毒大流行”期间就诊的患者。2021年3月1日至2021年6月14日期间入院的患者被纳入“第二波病毒大流行”期间入院的患者。收集了以下结局参数(出现的症状、个体进行诊断性RT-PCR之前的症状持续时间、症状总持续时间、发病时疾病的严重程度入院时间、最终结局(出院/死亡)以及查尔森合并症指数)。使用线性回归模型来建立社会人口统计学因素与发病时疾病严重程度(轻度/中度/重度/危重度)之间的关联。
在研究期间,共筛查了37033名患者,RT-PCR阳性率为16.99%(n = 6275)。其中45%(n = 2824)的患者患有轻度疾病,需要居家隔离,其余55%的患者需要住院治疗。排除后,第一波新冠疫情中的1590名患者和第二波中的910名患者被住院并纳入研究。第一波患者的平均年龄为49岁,第二波为54岁,两波中男性分别占77.6%和70.6%。与第一波相比,第二波中危重症病例的负担更高(10%对8%)。与第一波相比,第二波在农村人口中的传播范围更广(17.8%对12.2%)。两波中从症状出现到住院的平均时间分别为3天和4天。两波中的死亡率分别为11.9%和24%(P < 0.05)。查尔森合并症指数越高,死亡率越高,城市地区的累积生存率高于农村人口(对数秩 - 9.148,P = 0.0002)。
第二波新冠疫情的病例死亡率显著更高。它影响了老年患者和农村背景的患者。新冠疫情期间与较高死亡率相关的因素是农村背景、较高的查尔森合并症指数以及到医院就诊较晚。因此,正在进行的疫苗接种活动应侧重于农村地区和患有合并症的个体,特别是在发展中国家和最不发达国家。