Institute for Ethics, History and Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, iEH2, Geneva, Switzerland.
Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Unisanté, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Jul 1;23(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02222-3.
An array of evidence shows how the presence of implicit bias in clinical encounters can negatively impact provider-patient communication, quality of care and ultimately contribute to health inequities. Reflexive practice has been explored as an approach to identify and address implicit bias in healthcare providers, including medical students. At the Lausanne School of Medicine, a clinically integrated module was introduced in 2019 to raise students' awareness of gender bias in medical practice using a reflexivity and positionality approach. The purpose of this study is to describe the gender bias that were identified by medical students, analysing their types, places and modes of emergence during a clinical encounter. It further explores how positionality supported students' reflection on the way in which social position modulates their relationship to patients.
As part of the teaching activity, medical students individually reflected on gender bias in a specific clinical encounter by answering questions in their electronic portfolio. The questionnaire included a section on positionality. We qualitatively analysed the students' assignments (n=76), applying a thematic analysis framework.
Medical students identified and described gender biases occurring at different moments of the clinical encounter (anamnesis (i.e. patient history), physical exam, differential diagnosis, final management). They causally associated these biases with wider social phenomena such as the gendered division of labour or stereotypes around sexuality and gender. Analysing students' reflections on how their position influenced their relationship with patients, we found that the suggested exercise revealed a major contradiction in the process of medical enculturation: the injunction to be neutral and objective erases the social and cultural context of patients and impedes an understanding of gender bias.
Gender biases are present in the different steps of a clinical consultation and are rooted in broader gendered social representations. We further conclude that the tension between a quest for objectivity and the reality of social encounters should be made explicit to students, because it is constitutive of medical practice.
大量证据表明,临床接触中存在的隐性偏见会对医患沟通、医疗质量产生负面影响,并最终导致健康不平等。反思性实践已被探索用于识别和解决医疗保健提供者(包括医学生)中的隐性偏见。在洛桑医学院,2019 年引入了一个临床整合模块,通过反思性和定位方法提高学生对医学实践中性别偏见的认识。本研究的目的是描述医学生所识别的性别偏见,分析他们在临床接触中识别出的性别偏见的类型、地点和出现模式。它进一步探讨了定位如何支持学生反思社会地位如何调节他们与患者的关系。
作为教学活动的一部分,医学生通过在电子档案中回答问题,单独反思特定临床接触中的性别偏见。问卷包括一个关于定位的部分。我们对学生的作业(n=76)进行了定性分析,应用了主题分析框架。
医学生在临床接触的不同时刻识别并描述了性别偏见(病史、体检、鉴别诊断、最终管理)。他们将这些偏见与更广泛的社会现象联系起来,如性别分工或性和性别方面的刻板印象。分析学生对自己的立场如何影响他们与患者的关系的反思,我们发现,建议的练习揭示了医学文化过程中的一个主要矛盾:要求中立和客观消除了患者的社会和文化背景,阻碍了对性别偏见的理解。
性别偏见存在于临床咨询的不同步骤中,并根植于更广泛的性别社会代表性中。我们进一步得出结论,应该向学生明确说明客观性的追求与社会相遇的现实之间的紧张关系,因为它是医学实践的组成部分。