Bejar-Chapa Maria, Rossi Nicoló, King Nicholas, Hussey Madison R, Winograd Jonathan M, Guastaldi Fernando P S
From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Jul 2;12(7):e5952. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005952. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Lipedema is the progressive symmetrical deposition of subcutaneous fat and fluid in the lower body, ordinarily sparing the trunk, upper limbs, face, and neck. It may follow an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern. The gold standard treatment for lipedema is complete decongestive therapy, consisting of manual lymphatic drainage and compression garments. This scoping review assessed the existing literature on the effectiveness of liposuction as an alternative treatment for lipedema.
A scoping review of electronically available literature within PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane focused on liposuction as a treatment for lipedema considering the following inclusion criteria: human studies, case series of 10 or more, controlled trials, randomized controlled trials, patient-reported outcome measurement studies, survey analyses, descriptive studies, retrospective analyses, recurrence included, follow-up of 6 months or more, age 18 years or older, and treatment modality being liposuction.
Thirteen studies were selected. Nine studies reported decreased compression therapy use among patients following liposuction. No studies reported a long-term increase in compression therapy following liposuction. Studies found self-reported improvements in pain, mobility, bruising, and overall quality of life for patients following liposuction, many of whom had previously been on compressive therapy. Studies reported low rates of serious adverse events following liposuction, including deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and infection.
These results suggest that liposuction can be a viable treatment alternative to compression therapy for lipedema in patients whose compression therapy has not been helpful. However, there is not enough evidence to say whether liposuction is as effective as compression for patients first presenting with lipedema.
脂肪性水肿是皮下脂肪和液体在下肢进行性对称沉积,通常不累及躯干、上肢、面部和颈部。它可能遵循常染色体显性遗传模式。脂肪性水肿的金标准治疗方法是完全减压疗法,包括手动淋巴引流和加压服装。本范围综述评估了关于抽脂术作为脂肪性水肿替代治疗方法有效性的现有文献。
对PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane中电子可得文献进行范围综述,重点关注抽脂术作为脂肪性水肿治疗方法,考虑以下纳入标准:人体研究、10例或更多病例系列、对照试验、随机对照试验、患者报告结局测量研究、调查分析、描述性研究、回顾性分析、包括复发情况、随访6个月或更长时间、年龄18岁或以上以及治疗方式为抽脂术。
共筛选出13项研究。9项研究报告抽脂术后患者使用加压疗法的情况减少。没有研究报告抽脂术后加压疗法长期增加。研究发现抽脂术后患者自我报告疼痛、活动能力、瘀伤和总体生活质量有所改善,其中许多患者此前一直在接受加压疗法。研究报告抽脂术后严重不良事件发生率较低,包括深静脉血栓形成、肺栓塞和感染。
这些结果表明,对于加压疗法无效的脂肪性水肿患者,抽脂术可以作为一种可行的替代治疗方法。然而,没有足够的证据表明抽脂术对于首次出现脂肪性水肿的患者是否与加压疗法同样有效。