Suppr超能文献

竖脊肌平面阻滞在正中胸骨切开术围手术期镇痛中的效果:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of Erector Spinae Plane Block as Perioperative Analgesia in Midline Sternotomies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.

出版信息

Ann Card Anaesth. 2024 Jul 1;27(3):193-201. doi: 10.4103/aca.aca_134_23. Epub 2024 Jul 4.

Abstract

With the advancements in regional anesthesia and ultrasound techniques, the use of non-neuraxial blocks like the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been increasing in cardiac surgeries with promising outcomes. A total of 3,264 articles were identified through a literature search. Intervention was defined as ESPB. Comparators were no regional technique performed or sham blocks. Four studies with a total of 226 patients were included. Postoperative opioid consumption was lower in the group that received ESPB than the group that did not (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -204.08; 95% CI: -239.98 to -168.19; P < 0.00001). Intraoperative opioid consumption did not differ between the two groups (WMD: -398.14; 95% CI: -812.17 to 15.98; P = 0.06). Pain scores at 0 hours were lower in the group that received ESPB than the group that did not (WMD: -1.27; 95% CI: -1.99 to -0.56; P = 0.0005). Pain scores did not differ between the two groups at 4-6 hours (WMD: -0.79; 95% CI: -1.70 to 0.13; P = 0.09) and 12 hours (WMD: -0.83; 95% CI: -1.82 to 0.16; P = 0.10). Duration of mechanical ventilation in minutes was lower in the group that received ESPB than the group that did not (WMD: -45.12; 95% CI: -68.82 to -21.43; P = 0.0002). Given the limited number of studies and the substantial heterogeneity of measured outcomes and interventions, further studies are required to assess the benefit of ESPB in midline sternotomies.

摘要

通过文献检索共确定 3264 篇文章。干预措施定义为竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)。对照组为未行区域技术或假阻滞。纳入 4 项共 226 例患者的研究。接受 ESPB 的患者术后阿片类药物消耗量低于未接受者(加权均数差[WMD]:-204.08;95%CI:-239.98 至-168.19;P < 0.00001)。两组术中阿片类药物消耗量无差异(WMD:-398.14;95%CI:-812.17 至 15.98;P = 0.06)。接受 ESPB 的患者 0 小时疼痛评分低于未接受者(WMD:-1.27;95%CI:-1.99 至-0.56;P = 0.0005)。两组 4-6 小时(WMD:-0.79;95%CI:-1.70 至 0.13;P = 0.09)和 12 小时(WMD:-0.83;95%CI:-1.82 至 0.16;P = 0.10)疼痛评分无差异。接受 ESPB 的患者机械通气时间以分为单位低于未接受者(WMD:-45.12;95%CI:-68.82 至-21.43;P = 0.0002)。鉴于研究数量有限且测量结局和干预措施存在显著异质性,需要进一步研究评估竖脊肌平面阻滞在正中胸骨切开术中的获益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe43/11315266/04ceea835cda/ACA-27-193-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验