Suppr超能文献

竖脊肌平面阻滞用于胸外科手术镇痛的疗效:一项系统评价与Meta分析

Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block for Analgesia in Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Koo Chang-Hoon, Lee Hun-Taek, Na Hyo-Seok, Ryu Jung-Hee, Shin Hyun-Jung

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea; Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 May;36(5):1387-1395. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.06.029. Epub 2021 Jun 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine whether erector spinae plane block (ESPB) can provide an effective analgesia for managing pain after thoracic surgery and compare the efficacy of ESPB with that of other regional analgesic techniques.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

SETTING

PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients undergoing thoracic surgeries.

INTERVENTION

Erector spinae plane block with local anesthetics for postoperative analgesia.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

Seventeen studies, including 1,092 patients, were included in the final analysis. Erector spinae plane block reduced 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption (mean difference [MD] -17.49, 95% CI -26.87 to -8.12), pain score at rest (MD -0.82, 95% CI -1.31 to -0.33), and pain score at movement (MD -0.77, 95% CI -1.20 to -0.3) compared to no block. Compared with other regional blocks, various results have been observed. Although statistical results showed that ESPB is inferior to thoracic paravertebral block and intercostal nerve block and superior to serratus anterior plan block in postoperative analgesia, clinical differences remain unclear. The incidence of hematoma was lower in the ESPB group than in the other groups (odds ratio 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.73).

CONCLUSION

Erector spinae plane block may provide effective analgesia after thoracic surgery. Compared with other techniques, it is a safer method, without clinically important differences, for postoperative pain control. Therefore, ESPB may be considered as a valuable option for postoperative pain management after thoracic surgery.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是确定竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)能否为胸科手术后的疼痛管理提供有效的镇痛效果,并比较ESPB与其他区域镇痛技术的疗效。

设计

对随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

设置

检索了PubMed、EMBASE、CENTRAL、CINAHL、Scopus和Web of Science。

参与者

接受胸科手术的患者。

干预措施

使用局部麻醉剂进行竖脊肌平面阻滞以用于术后镇痛。

测量指标及主要结果

最终分析纳入了17项研究,共1092例患者。与未阻滞相比,竖脊肌平面阻滞减少了术后24小时的阿片类药物消耗量(平均差[MD]-17.49,95%可信区间[-26.87,-8.12])、静息时疼痛评分(MD -0.82,95%可信区间[-1.31,-0.33])和活动时疼痛评分(MD -0.77,95%可信区间[-1.20,-0.3])。与其他区域阻滞相比,观察到了各种结果。尽管统计结果显示ESPB在术后镇痛方面不如胸段椎旁阻滞和肋间神经阻滞,优于前锯肌平面阻滞,但临床差异仍不明确。ESPB组血肿发生率低于其他组(优势比0.19,95%可信区间[0.05,0.73])。

结论

竖脊肌平面阻滞可能为胸科手术后提供有效的镇痛。与其他技术相比,它是一种更安全的方法,在术后疼痛控制方面没有临床重要差异。因此,ESPB可被视为胸科手术后疼痛管理的一个有价值的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验