Archer Lucinda, Peat George, Snell Kym I E, Hill Jonathan C, Dunn Kate M, Foster Nadine E, Bishop Annette, van der Windt Danielle, Wynne-Jones Gwenllian
School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
J Occup Rehabil. 2024 Jul 4. doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10223-w.
To develop and validate prediction models for the risk of future work absence and level of presenteeism, in adults seeking primary healthcare with musculoskeletal disorders (MSD).
Six studies from the West-Midlands/Northwest regions of England, recruiting adults consulting primary care with MSD were included for model development and internal-external cross-validation (IECV). The primary outcome was any work absence within 6 months of their consultation. Secondary outcomes included 6-month presenteeism and 12-month work absence. Ten candidate predictors were included: age; sex; multisite pain; baseline pain score; pain duration; job type; anxiety/depression; comorbidities; absence in the previous 6 months; and baseline presenteeism.
For the 6-month absence model, 2179 participants (215 absences) were available across five studies. Calibration was promising, although varied across studies, with a pooled calibration slope of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.41-1.46) on IECV. On average, the model discriminated well between those with work absence within 6 months, and those without (IECV-pooled C-statistic 0.76, 95% CI: 0.66-0.86). The 6-month presenteeism model, while well calibrated on average, showed some individual-level variation in predictive accuracy, and the 12-month absence model was poorly calibrated due to the small available size for model development.
The developed models predict 6-month work absence and presenteeism with reasonable accuracy, on average, in adults consulting with MSD. The model to predict 12-month absence was poorly calibrated and is not yet ready for use in practice. This information may support shared decision-making and targeting occupational health interventions at those with a higher risk of absence or presenteeism in the 6 months following consultation. Further external validation is needed before the models' use can be recommended or their impact on patients can be fully assessed.
针对患有肌肉骨骼疾病(MSD)且寻求初级医疗保健的成年人,开发并验证未来工作缺勤风险和出勤主义程度的预测模型。
纳入来自英格兰西米德兰兹/西北地区的六项研究,这些研究招募了因MSD而咨询初级保健的成年人,用于模型开发和内部-外部交叉验证(IECV)。主要结局是他们咨询后6个月内的任何工作缺勤情况。次要结局包括6个月的出勤主义情况和12个月的工作缺勤情况。纳入了十个候选预测因素:年龄;性别;多部位疼痛;基线疼痛评分;疼痛持续时间;工作类型;焦虑/抑郁;合并症;前6个月的缺勤情况;以及基线出勤主义情况。
对于6个月缺勤模型,五项研究中有2179名参与者(215例缺勤)可供分析。校准结果有希望,尽管各研究之间存在差异,IECV的合并校准斜率为0.93(95%CI:0.41-1.46)。平均而言,该模型在6个月内有工作缺勤者和无工作缺勤者之间的区分效果良好(IECV合并C统计量为0.76,95%CI:0.66-0.86)。6个月出勤主义模型虽然平均校准良好,但在预测准确性方面存在一些个体水平的差异,而12个月缺勤模型由于用于模型开发的可用样本量较小,校准效果不佳。
所开发的模型平均而言能够以合理的准确性预测患有MSD且寻求咨询的成年人6个月内的工作缺勤和出勤主义情况。预测12个月缺勤的模型校准效果不佳,尚未准备好在实践中使用。这些信息可能有助于共同决策,并针对咨询后6个月内缺勤或出勤主义风险较高的人群开展职业健康干预。在推荐使用这些模型或全面评估其对患者的影响之前,还需要进一步的外部验证。