Suppr超能文献

肌肉骨骼健康与工作:预测寻求初级医疗保健者工作缺勤和出勤主义风险模型的开发及内部-外部交叉验证

Musculoskeletal Health and Work: Development and Internal-External Cross-Validation of a Model to Predict Risk of Work Absence and Presenteeism in People Seeking Primary Healthcare.

作者信息

Archer Lucinda, Peat George, Snell Kym I E, Hill Jonathan C, Dunn Kate M, Foster Nadine E, Bishop Annette, van der Windt Danielle, Wynne-Jones Gwenllian

机构信息

School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.

Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

出版信息

J Occup Rehabil. 2024 Jul 4. doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10223-w.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To develop and validate prediction models for the risk of future work absence and level of presenteeism, in adults seeking primary healthcare with musculoskeletal disorders (MSD).

METHODS

Six studies from the West-Midlands/Northwest regions of England, recruiting adults consulting primary care with MSD were included for model development and internal-external cross-validation (IECV). The primary outcome was any work absence within 6 months of their consultation. Secondary outcomes included 6-month presenteeism and 12-month work absence. Ten candidate predictors were included: age; sex; multisite pain; baseline pain score; pain duration; job type; anxiety/depression; comorbidities; absence in the previous 6 months; and baseline presenteeism.

RESULTS

For the 6-month absence model, 2179 participants (215 absences) were available across five studies. Calibration was promising, although varied across studies, with a pooled calibration slope of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.41-1.46) on IECV. On average, the model discriminated well between those with work absence within 6 months, and those without (IECV-pooled C-statistic 0.76, 95% CI: 0.66-0.86). The 6-month presenteeism model, while well calibrated on average, showed some individual-level variation in predictive accuracy, and the 12-month absence model was poorly calibrated due to the small available size for model development.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed models predict 6-month work absence and presenteeism with reasonable accuracy, on average, in adults consulting with MSD. The model to predict 12-month absence was poorly calibrated and is not yet ready for use in practice. This information may support shared decision-making and targeting occupational health interventions at those with a higher risk of absence or presenteeism in the 6 months following consultation. Further external validation is needed before the models' use can be recommended or their impact on patients can be fully assessed.

摘要

目的

针对患有肌肉骨骼疾病(MSD)且寻求初级医疗保健的成年人,开发并验证未来工作缺勤风险和出勤主义程度的预测模型。

方法

纳入来自英格兰西米德兰兹/西北地区的六项研究,这些研究招募了因MSD而咨询初级保健的成年人,用于模型开发和内部-外部交叉验证(IECV)。主要结局是他们咨询后6个月内的任何工作缺勤情况。次要结局包括6个月的出勤主义情况和12个月的工作缺勤情况。纳入了十个候选预测因素:年龄;性别;多部位疼痛;基线疼痛评分;疼痛持续时间;工作类型;焦虑/抑郁;合并症;前6个月的缺勤情况;以及基线出勤主义情况。

结果

对于6个月缺勤模型,五项研究中有2179名参与者(215例缺勤)可供分析。校准结果有希望,尽管各研究之间存在差异,IECV的合并校准斜率为0.93(95%CI:0.41-1.46)。平均而言,该模型在6个月内有工作缺勤者和无工作缺勤者之间的区分效果良好(IECV合并C统计量为0.76,95%CI:0.66-0.86)。6个月出勤主义模型虽然平均校准良好,但在预测准确性方面存在一些个体水平的差异,而12个月缺勤模型由于用于模型开发的可用样本量较小,校准效果不佳。

结论

所开发的模型平均而言能够以合理的准确性预测患有MSD且寻求咨询的成年人6个月内的工作缺勤和出勤主义情况。预测12个月缺勤的模型校准效果不佳,尚未准备好在实践中使用。这些信息可能有助于共同决策,并针对咨询后6个月内缺勤或出勤主义风险较高的人群开展职业健康干预。在推荐使用这些模型或全面评估其对患者的影响之前,还需要进一步的外部验证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验