全球融资基金对弱势人群的投资:2015 年至 2019 年 11 个非洲国家母婴健康和死产情况的内容分析。
Global Financing Facility investments for vulnerable populations: content analysis regarding maternal and newborn health and stillbirths in 11 African countries, 2015 to 2019.
机构信息
School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Nothumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
出版信息
Glob Health Action. 2024 Dec 31;17(1):2329369. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2329369. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
BACKGROUND
The Global Financing Facility (GFF) was launched in 2015 to catalyse increased domestic and external financing for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, adolescent health, and nutrition. Half of the deaths along this continuum are neonatal deaths, stillbirths or maternal deaths; yet these topics receive the least aid financing across the continuum.
OBJECTIVES
To conduct a policy content analysis of maternal and newborn health (MNH), including stillbirths, in GFF country planning documents, and assess the mortality burden related to the investment.
METHODS
Content analysis was conducted on 24 GFF policy documents, investment cases and project appraisal documents (PADs), from 11 African countries. We used a systematic data extraction approach and applied a framework for analysis considering mindset, measures, and money for MNH interventions and mentions of mortality outcomes. We compared PAD investments to MNH-related deaths by country.
RESULTS
For these 11 countries, USD$1,894 million of new funds were allocated through the PADs, including USD$303 million (16%) from GFF. All documents had strong content on MNH, with particular focus on pregnancy and childbirth interventions. The investment cases commonly included comprehensive results frameworks, and PADs generally had less technical content and fewer indicators. Mortality outcomes were mentioned, especially for maternal. Stillbirths were rarely included as targets. Countries had differing approaches to funding descriptions. PAD allocations are commensurate with the burden.
CONCLUSIONS
The GFF country plans present a promising start in addressing MNH. Emphasising links between investments and burden, explicitly including stillbirth, and highlighting high-impact packages, as appropriate, could potentially increase impact.
背景
全球融资基金(GFF)于 2015 年启动,旨在促进增加生殖、孕产妇、新生儿、儿童和青少年健康和营养方面的国内和外部资金。该连续体中的一半死亡是新生儿死亡、死产或孕产妇死亡;然而,这些主题在整个连续体中获得的援助资金最少。
目的
对 GFF 国家规划文件中的孕产妇和新生儿健康(MNH),包括死产进行政策内容分析,并评估与投资相关的死亡负担。
方法
对来自 11 个非洲国家的 24 份 GFF 政策文件、投资案例和项目评估文件(PAD)进行内容分析。我们使用系统的数据提取方法,并应用了一个考虑 MNH 干预措施的思维模式、措施和资金以及死亡率结果的分析框架。我们比较了 PAD 投资与各国的 MNH 相关死亡。
结果
对于这 11 个国家,通过 PAD 分配了 18.94 亿美元的新资金,其中包括来自 GFF 的 3.03 亿美元(16%)。所有文件都对 MNH 有很强的内容,特别关注妊娠和分娩干预措施。投资案例通常包括全面的结果框架,而 PAD 通常具有较少的技术内容和较少的指标。死亡率结果被提及,特别是孕产妇死亡率。死产很少被作为目标。各国对资金描述的方法各不相同。PAD 分配与负担相称。
结论
GFF 国家计划在解决 MNH 方面提供了一个有希望的开端。强调投资与负担之间的联系,明确包括死产,并酌情强调高影响力的方案,可能会增加影响。