Comparison of the effectiveness of core genome multilocus sequence typing and polymerase chain reaction-based open reading frame typing in tracing nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission.

INTRODUCTION

A clonal shift from staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type II/ST5 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) to SCCmec type IV/clonal complex (CC)1 MRSA has occurred rapidly in Japan. Our previous research in a geriatric hospital found SCCmec type IV/CC1 MRSA prevalence in long-term care wards. Due to intensive personal care requirements, frequent contact with healthcare providers can potentially cause unintentional nosocomial MRSA transmission. We performed polymerase chain reaction-based open reading frame typing (POT) and core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST) to investigate the occurrence of nosocomial transmission and to compare the results of these methods.

METHODS

POT and whole genome sequencing were performed in 83 MRSA isolates. Commercial automated software (Ridom SeqSphere+) was used to perform cgMLST. MRSA isolates with 0-8 allelic differences were considered related, and medical records were consulted in these cases.

RESULTS

SCCmec type IV/CC1 MRSA was the most frequently detected clone (n = 56, 67.5 %), which was divided into 14 POT types, followed by SCCmec type I/ST8 (n = 9) and SCCmec type IV/ST8 (n = 8). Identical POT types were found across 7 of 11 wards. However, cgMLST analysis identified only three cases (six strains) of high genetic similarity, indicating nosocomial transmission; only one involved SCCmec type IV/CC1 (two strains). The mean allelic difference in the core genomes between strains with identical POT types in the same ward was 55.3 ± 22.0.

CONCLUSIONS

The cgMLST method proved more effective for identifying nosocomial transmissions compared to POT, highlighting its utility in tracking MRSA spread in healthcare settings.