Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia; Department of Physiotherapy, Balmain Hospital, Balmain, Australia; Allied Health, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, Australia.
Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia; Department of Physiotherapy, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia; Allied Health, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, Australia.
Respir Med. 2024 Sep;231:107724. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107724. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
Very few studies have examined patterns of physical activity (PA) during a pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program in people with COPD.
To compare the patterns of PA in: 1) the week before commencing PR (pre-PR) with a week during PR (PR week); 2) PR days and non-PR days during a PR week; 3) pre-PR and the week following PR completion (post-PR).
This was a multicenter, prospective cohort study. Participants attended twice weekly supervised PR for 8-12 weeks. Daily step count (primary outcome), time in light activities, time in moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA), total sedentary time and sit-to-stand (STS) transitions were measured using a thigh worn accelerometer for seven days, at each assessment time point: pre-PR, PR week and post-PR.
29 participants, mean age (SD) 69years(7), FEV 53%pred(16). The PR week compared to pre-PR, showed higher daily: step count (mean difference (95%CI)), 941steps(388-1494); and MVPA, 11mins(6-15), with no difference in: time in light activities, -1min(-6-5); total sedentary time, 7mins(-21-36); or STS transitions, 0(-5-6). PR days compared to non-PR days showed higher: step count, 2810steps(1706-3913); time in light activities 11mins(1-20); time in MVPA, 27mins(17-35) and STS transitions, 8(4-12), with no difference in total sedentary time: -33mins(-80-15). There were no differences in any PA measures post-PR compared to pre-PR (p < 0.05).
Daily step count and time spent in MVPA increased significantly during the PR week, solely due to increased PA on days participants attended PR.
很少有研究检查 COPD 患者在肺康复(PR)计划期间的体力活动(PA)模式。
比较以下情况的 PA 模式:1)开始 PR 前一周(PR 前)与 PR 周内一周(PR 周);2)PR 周内的 PR 日和非 PR 日;3)PR 前和 PR 完成后一周(PR 后)。
这是一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。参与者每周接受两次监督 PR,为期 8-12 周。使用大腿佩戴的加速度计在每个评估时间点(PR 前、PR 周和 PR 后)测量 7 天的日常步数(主要结果)、轻度活动时间、中等到剧烈体力活动(MVPA)时间、总久坐时间和坐站(STS)转换。
29 名参与者,平均年龄(标准差)69 岁(7 岁),FEV 53%预测值(16)。与 PR 前相比,PR 周的日常:步数(平均差异(95%置信区间)),941 步(388-1494);和 MVPA,11 分钟(6-15),但没有差异:轻度活动时间,-1 分钟(-6-5);总久坐时间,7 分钟(-21-36);或 STS 转换,0(-5-6)。与非 PR 日相比,PR 日的:步数更高,2810 步(1706-3913);轻度活动时间 11 分钟(1-20);MVPA 时间 27 分钟(17-35)和 STS 转换 8 次(4-12),总久坐时间无差异:-33 分钟(-80-15)。与 PR 前相比,PR 后任何 PA 测量均无差异(p<0.05)。
在 PR 周期间,日常步数和 MVPA 时间显著增加,这仅仅是由于参与者参加 PR 日的活动量增加。