Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Samsun Education and Research Hospital, Samsun, Turkey.
Nursing Department, Pediatric Nursing, Health Sciences Faculty, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey.
J Pediatr Nurs. 2024 Sep-Oct;78:e117-e123. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2024.06.026. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
Purpose To compare the effectiveness of sunflower oil and silicone-based spray used to remove medical adhesives from the orogastric catheter in preventing the skin injury of premature infants in the neonatal intensive care unit.
This randomized controlled experimental study was conducted on premature infants, born between 32 and 36 weeks, hospitalized in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit located in the city center of the Black Sea region. There were 86 participants in the study; 43 were in the control group (silicone-based spray), and 43 were in the intervention group (sunflower oil). The "Neonatal Skin Condition Score Scale" evaluated premature infants' skin.
Mean skin condition score of premature infants for whom silicone-based adhesive remover spray was applied was 3.63 ± 0.78, whereas the mean skin condition score measured three hours later was 3.17 ± 0.37. Mean skin condition score of premature infants for whom sunflower oil was applied as a medical adhesive remover was 3.40 ± 0.62, whereas the mean skin condition score measured three hours later was 3.07 ± 0.25. No statistically significant difference was determined between the mean skin condition scores of premature infants in both groups evaluated immediately after removing the medical adhesive and 3 h there after (p>0.05).
There is no difference between the skin condition of premature infants for whom silicone-based medical adhesive remover spray is used and the skin condition of premature infants for whom sunflower oil is used to remove the orogastric tube adhesive.
Pediatric nurses should use medical supplies suitable for the skin condition of premature infants and should frequently evaluate the baby's skin condition. Since silicone-based adhesive remover sprays have a risk of toxicity by being absorbed by the skin, it is recommended to use herbal, cost-effective, non-toxic products.
NCT06280326.
比较葵花籽油和硅基喷雾在预防重症监护病房早产儿经口胃管医用黏胶相关皮肤损伤中的有效性。
这是一项在黑海地区市中心医院新生儿重症监护病房出生、胎龄 32-36 周的早产儿中进行的随机对照实验研究。研究共纳入 86 名早产儿,其中 43 名接受硅基喷雾处理(对照组),43 名接受葵花籽油处理(干预组)。采用“新生儿皮肤状况评分量表”评估早产儿的皮肤状况。
使用硅基黏胶去除剂喷雾的早产儿的平均皮肤状况评分为 3.63±0.78,三小时后测量的平均皮肤状况评分为 3.17±0.37。使用葵花籽油作为医用黏胶去除剂的早产儿的平均皮肤状况评分为 3.40±0.62,三小时后测量的平均皮肤状况评分为 3.07±0.25。两组早产儿在去除医用黏胶后即刻和 3 小时后评估的平均皮肤状况评分之间无统计学差异(p>0.05)。
使用硅基医用黏胶去除剂喷雾和使用葵花籽油去除经口胃管黏胶的早产儿的皮肤状况无差异。
儿科护士应根据早产儿的皮肤状况选择合适的医疗用品,并经常评估婴儿的皮肤状况。由于硅基黏胶去除剂喷雾可能会被皮肤吸收而产生毒性,因此建议使用草药、经济实惠、无毒的产品。
NCT06280326。