Suppr超能文献

认知障碍老年人的听力筛查:一项系统评价

Hearing Screening for Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Limkitisupasin Patcharaorn, Jongpradubgiat Piyawat, Utoomprurkporn Nattawan

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.

Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

J Audiol Otol. 2024 Oct;28(4):260-270. doi: 10.7874/jao.2023.00507. Epub 2024 Jul 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hearing loss is the largest potentially modifiable risk factor for dementia. Early evaluation and intervention are crucial for older adults with cognitive impairment. However, pure-tone audiometry (PTA), the gold standard, may have limitations. This study reviewed auditory tests for detecting hearing loss in this population, comparing to PTA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a systematic review in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Ten studies (1,071 participants) comparing auditory tests and PTA in patients with dementia and mild cognitive impairment were included.

RESULTS

Electrophysiological and behavioral tests demonstrated strong correlation and accurate hearing impairment detection compared to PTA. Conversely, self-reported assessment showed weaker correlations when aligned with hearing thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the potential of electrophysiological and behavioral auditory tests in detecting hearing impairment in older adults with cognitive impairment, emphasizing the need for further research to develop practical screening protocols for this vulnerable population.

摘要

背景与目的

听力损失是痴呆症最大的潜在可改变风险因素。对于有认知障碍的老年人,早期评估和干预至关重要。然而,作为金标准的纯音听力测试(PTA)可能存在局限性。本研究回顾了用于检测该人群听力损失的听觉测试,并与PTA进行比较。

材料与方法

按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,我们在PubMed、Scopus和Embase中进行了系统评价。纳入了10项研究(1071名参与者),这些研究比较了痴呆症和轻度认知障碍患者的听觉测试与PTA。

结果

与PTA相比,电生理和行为测试显示出很强的相关性,且能准确检测听力障碍。相反,自我报告评估与听力阈值比对时显示出较弱的相关性。

结论

本研究强调了电生理和行为听觉测试在检测有认知障碍的老年人听力障碍方面的潜力,强调需要进一步研究为这一弱势群体制定实用的筛查方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04ee/11540973/eb70b903db89/jao-2023-00507f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验