• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《国际疾病分类第11版》人格障碍严重程度评定及诊断的可靠性

Reliability of the ICD-11 personality disorder severity ratings and diagnosis.

作者信息

Aydın-Seyrek Tuğba, Gandur Tarık, Turgut Neslihan, Kunt Duygu Aslan, Dereboy Ferhan

机构信息

Dr Cevdet Aykan Mental Health Hospital, Tokat, Turkey.

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Economics, Administrative and Social Sciences, Fenerbahçe University, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Personal Ment Health. 2024 Nov;18(4):339-346. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1629. Epub 2024 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1002/pmh.1629
PMID:38973511
Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the interrater reliability of the dichotomous and dimensional personality disorder (PD) diagnoses based on the overall severity assessment on a rating form consisting of 18 anchored items encompassing diagnostic requirements of the International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11). We also aimed to examine the extent of consistency within the diagnostic requirements grouped under the domains of self- and interpersonal functioning, specific manifestations of personality dysfunction, and distress and impairment in psychosocial functioning. Our data involved a total of 184 inter-ratings of 46 consenting patients by the same set of four clinicians. The chance-corrected agreement levels were estimated at intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.89 for the overall severity composite, ICC = 0.83 for the dimensional PD diagnosis and Fleiss' kappa = 0.77 for the dichotomous PD diagnosis. Internal consistency analysis of the overall severity composite and the domain composites revealed Cronbach's alpha coefficients approaching or exceeding 0.90 level. Our findings suggest that the diagnostic requirements listed in the ICD-11 and related documents for the severity determination in PD compose an internally consistent set. With the guidance of a rating form comprised of anchored items covering this set, competency-level clinicians are likely to perform reliable evaluations of the severity of personality disturbance, and dimensional and dichotomous PD diagnoses. The development of semi-structured interviews that would further facilitate the task of inspecting and rating each diagnostic requirement reliably will possibly enhance the implementation of the ICD-11 classification for PD around the world.

摘要

本研究旨在基于一份由18个锚定项目组成的评定量表,调查二分法和维度法人格障碍(PD)诊断的评定者间信度,该评定量表涵盖了《国际疾病分类第11版》(ICD - 11)的诊断要求。我们还旨在检查在自我和人际功能领域、人格功能障碍的具体表现以及心理社会功能中的痛苦和损害等分组下的诊断要求的一致程度。我们的数据涉及由同一组4名临床医生对46名同意参与的患者进行的总共184次评定者间评定。总体严重程度综合指标的组内相关系数(ICC)估计为0.89,维度法PD诊断的ICC为0.83,二分法PD诊断的Fleiss' kappa为0.77。总体严重程度综合指标和领域综合指标的内部一致性分析显示,Cronbach's alpha系数接近或超过0.90水平。我们的研究结果表明,ICD - 11及相关文件中列出的用于PD严重程度判定的诊断要求构成了一个内部一致的集合。在一份由涵盖该集合的锚定项目组成的评定量表的指导下,具备专业能力的临床医生可能会对人格障碍的严重程度以及维度法和二分法PD诊断进行可靠的评估。进一步促进可靠检查和评定每个诊断要求任务的半结构化访谈的开发,可能会加强ICD - 11在全球范围内对PD的分类实施。

相似文献

1
Reliability of the ICD-11 personality disorder severity ratings and diagnosis.《国际疾病分类第11版》人格障碍严重程度评定及诊断的可靠性
Personal Ment Health. 2024 Nov;18(4):339-346. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1629. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
2
Reliability and validity of the Personality Disorder Severity ICD-11 (PDS-ICD-11) scale and the Revised Personality Assessment Questionnaire for ICD-11 (PAQ-11R) in a Norwegian community sample.在挪威社区样本中,人格障碍严重程度 ICD-11(PDS-ICD-11)量表和修订版人格评估问卷 ICD-11(PAQ-11R)的信度和效度。
Personal Ment Health. 2024 Nov;18(4):347-356. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1630. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
3
[Preliminary comparative study of the personality disorder evaluation DIP instrument with the semi-structured SCID-II interview].[人格障碍评估工具DIP与半结构化访谈SCID-II的初步比较研究]
Encephale. 2009 Dec;35(6):544-53. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.09.007.
4
Internal consistency of measures for ICD-11 personality disorder severity and traits: A systematic review and meta-analysis.国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)人格障碍严重程度及特质测量的内部一致性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Personal Ment Health. 2024 Nov;18(4):357-368. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1631. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
5
Self-Reported Personality Disorder Severity in Peruvian Adolescents: Structure, Validity, and Tentative Cutoffs.秘鲁青少年自我报告的人格障碍严重程度:结构、效度和暂定界限。
J Pers Disord. 2024 Aug;38(4):401-413. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2024.38.4.401.
6
Development and psychometric evaluation of the Personality Disorder Severity ICD-11 (PDS-ICD-11) Clinician-Rating Form.人格障碍严重程度ICD - 11(PDS - ICD - 11)临床评定量表的编制与心理测量学评估。
Personal Ment Health. 2024 Feb;18(1):60-68. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1596. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
7
A psychometric evaluation of the Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD) in nonclinical and clinical German samples.非临床和临床德国样本中人格障碍严重程度标准化评估量表(SASPD)的心理计量学评估。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Oct;32(10):984-990. doi: 10.1037/pas0000926. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
8
Examining the reliability and validity of the ICD-11 personality disorder severity diagnosis.检查 ICD-11 人格障碍严重程度诊断的可靠性和有效性。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2023 Jul;57(7):1043-1051. doi: 10.1177/00048674221136457. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
9
Development and validation of a new procedure for the diagnostic assessment of personality disorder: the Multidimensional Personality Disorder Rating Scale (MPDRS).一种用于人格障碍诊断评估的新方法的开发与验证:多维人格障碍评定量表(MPDRS)。
J Pers Disord. 2008 Jun;22(3):246-58. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2008.22.3.246.
10
[Diagnostic structured interviews in child and adolescent's psychiatry].[儿童和青少年精神病学中的诊断性结构化访谈]
Encephale. 2004 Mar-Apr;30(2):122-34. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95422-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Personality Disorder Severity-ICD-11 Scale and CPTSD ICD-11 Scale: examining possible psychometric properties and diagnostic concept overlap.人格障碍严重程度-国际疾病分类第11版量表与复杂创伤后应激障碍国际疾病分类第11版量表:探究可能的心理测量特性和诊断概念重叠情况。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2541472. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2541472. Epub 2025 Sep 4.