Aydın-Seyrek Tuğba, Gandur Tarık, Turgut Neslihan, Kunt Duygu Aslan, Dereboy Ferhan
Dr Cevdet Aykan Mental Health Hospital, Tokat, Turkey.
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Economics, Administrative and Social Sciences, Fenerbahçe University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Personal Ment Health. 2024 Nov;18(4):339-346. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1629. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
The present study aimed to investigate the interrater reliability of the dichotomous and dimensional personality disorder (PD) diagnoses based on the overall severity assessment on a rating form consisting of 18 anchored items encompassing diagnostic requirements of the International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11). We also aimed to examine the extent of consistency within the diagnostic requirements grouped under the domains of self- and interpersonal functioning, specific manifestations of personality dysfunction, and distress and impairment in psychosocial functioning. Our data involved a total of 184 inter-ratings of 46 consenting patients by the same set of four clinicians. The chance-corrected agreement levels were estimated at intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.89 for the overall severity composite, ICC = 0.83 for the dimensional PD diagnosis and Fleiss' kappa = 0.77 for the dichotomous PD diagnosis. Internal consistency analysis of the overall severity composite and the domain composites revealed Cronbach's alpha coefficients approaching or exceeding 0.90 level. Our findings suggest that the diagnostic requirements listed in the ICD-11 and related documents for the severity determination in PD compose an internally consistent set. With the guidance of a rating form comprised of anchored items covering this set, competency-level clinicians are likely to perform reliable evaluations of the severity of personality disturbance, and dimensional and dichotomous PD diagnoses. The development of semi-structured interviews that would further facilitate the task of inspecting and rating each diagnostic requirement reliably will possibly enhance the implementation of the ICD-11 classification for PD around the world.
本研究旨在基于一份由18个锚定项目组成的评定量表,调查二分法和维度法人格障碍(PD)诊断的评定者间信度,该评定量表涵盖了《国际疾病分类第11版》(ICD - 11)的诊断要求。我们还旨在检查在自我和人际功能领域、人格功能障碍的具体表现以及心理社会功能中的痛苦和损害等分组下的诊断要求的一致程度。我们的数据涉及由同一组4名临床医生对46名同意参与的患者进行的总共184次评定者间评定。总体严重程度综合指标的组内相关系数(ICC)估计为0.89,维度法PD诊断的ICC为0.83,二分法PD诊断的Fleiss' kappa为0.77。总体严重程度综合指标和领域综合指标的内部一致性分析显示,Cronbach's alpha系数接近或超过0.90水平。我们的研究结果表明,ICD - 11及相关文件中列出的用于PD严重程度判定的诊断要求构成了一个内部一致的集合。在一份由涵盖该集合的锚定项目组成的评定量表的指导下,具备专业能力的临床医生可能会对人格障碍的严重程度以及维度法和二分法PD诊断进行可靠的评估。进一步促进可靠检查和评定每个诊断要求任务的半结构化访谈的开发,可能会加强ICD - 11在全球范围内对PD的分类实施。