Lugo Santiago Nicole, Ituarte Philip H G, Kohut Adrian, Senguttuvan Rosemary, Ruel Nora, Nelson Rebecca, Tergas Ana, Rodriguez Lorna, Song Mihae
City of Hope, Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Surgery.
City of Hope, Department of Surgical Oncology.
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2024 Jun 13;54:101430. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101430. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Living in a food desert is a known negative health risk, with recent literature finding an associated higher mortality in patients with cancers. Gynecologic cancers have not specifically been studied. We aimed to describe patients with gynecologic cancers who live in a food desert and determine if there is an association between living in a food desert and gynecologic cancer mortality.
The 2013-2019 California Cancer Registry (CCR) was used to identify patients with endometrial, ovarian, or cervical cancers. Patient residential census tract was linked to food desert census tracts identified by the 2015 United States Department of Agriculture Food Access Research Atlas. Comorbidity data were obtained from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database (OSHPD). Treatment, diagnosis, and survival outcomes were obtained from the CCR's variables and compared by food desert status. Five-year disease-specific survival was analyzed by applying Cox proportional hazards analysis.
40,340 gynecologic cancer cases were identified. 60.1 % had endometrial cancer, 23.2 % had ovarian cancer, and 15.9 % had cervical cancer. The average age of the cohort was 59.4 years, 48.0 % was non-Hispanic White, 50.3 % was privately insured, and 6.8 % of lived in a food desert. Living in a food desert was associated with higher disease-specific mortality for patients with gynecologic cancers (endometrial cancer HR 1.43p < 0.001 95 % CI 1.22-1.68; ovarian cancer HR 1.47p < 0.001 95 % CI 1.27-1.69; cervical cancer HR 1.24p = 0.045 95 % CI 1.01-1.54).
Patients living in food deserts had worse disease-specific survival, making access to food a modifiable risk factor that may result in mitigating gynecologic cancer disparities.
生活在食物荒漠地区是一种已知的负面健康风险,近期文献发现癌症患者的死亡率与之相关。但尚未对妇科癌症进行专门研究。我们旨在描述生活在食物荒漠地区的妇科癌症患者,并确定生活在食物荒漠地区与妇科癌症死亡率之间是否存在关联。
利用2013 - 2019年加利福尼亚癌症登记处(CCR)的数据来识别子宫内膜癌、卵巢癌或宫颈癌患者。患者的居住普查区与2015年美国农业部食品获取研究地图集确定的食物荒漠普查区相关联。合并症数据来自加利福尼亚州全州卫生规划与发展办公室数据库(OSHPD)。治疗、诊断和生存结果从CCR的变量中获取,并按食物荒漠状况进行比较。应用Cox比例风险分析对五年疾病特异性生存率进行分析。
共识别出40340例妇科癌症病例。其中60.1%为子宫内膜癌,23.2%为卵巢癌,15.9%为宫颈癌。该队列的平均年龄为59.4岁,48.0%为非西班牙裔白人,50.3%拥有私人保险,6.8%生活在食物荒漠地区。生活在食物荒漠地区与妇科癌症患者较高的疾病特异性死亡率相关(子宫内膜癌HR 1.43,p < 0.001,95% CI 1.22 - 1.68;卵巢癌HR 1.47,p < 0.001,95% CI 1.27 - 1.69;宫颈癌HR 1.24,p = 0.045,95% CI 1.01 - 1.54)。
生活在食物荒漠地区的患者疾病特异性生存率较差,这使得获取食物成为一个可改变的风险因素,可能有助于缓解妇科癌症差异。