Reise Rachel, Ndai Asinamai M, Dewar Marvin A, Schentrup Anzeela M, Yang Julia, Vouri Scott Martin
University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, FL, USA.
University of Florida Health Physicians, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Jun 5;14:100460. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100460. eCollection 2024 Jun.
This study evaluates the impact of Real-Time Prescription Benefits (RTPB), a tool integrated into electronic health records (EHRs), on patient out-of-pocket costs in an academic institution. RTPB provides prescribers with alternative, less expensive medications based on insurance plans. The primary measure was cost-savings, defined as the difference between the out-of-pocket cost of the prescribed medication and its alternative.
A retrospective analysis of prescriptions from outpatient clinics in a university-based health system was conducted between May 2020 and July 2021. Prescriptions were analyzed at the 2nd level of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system. Costs were standardized to a 30-day supply. Standardized cost and total cost per prescription, and overall savings for the top 20 medication classes at the 2nd ATC level were calculated. The overall impact of RTPB was estimated based on selecting the least expensive alternative suggested by RTPB.
The study found that RTPB information was provided for 22% of prescriptions, with suggested alternatives for 1.26%. Among prescriptions with an alternative selected, the standardized average cost saving was $38.83. The study realized $15,416 in patient total cost savings. If the least expensive RTPB-suggested alternative were chosen for all prescriptions, an estimated $276,386 could have been saved. Psychoanaleptic and psycholeptic medications were the most prescribed with an alternative, with most savings in specialty drugs like anthelmintic and immunostimulant medications.
The study highlights the importance of RTPB in reducing patient costs. It reports patient cost-savings with RTPB in prescribing decisions. Future research could explore the impact of RTPB on medication adherence using pharmacy claims data.
本研究评估了电子健康记录(EHR)中集成的实时处方福利(RTPB)工具对一家学术机构中患者自付费用的影响。RTPB根据保险计划为开处方者提供替代的、成本较低的药物。主要衡量指标是成本节约,定义为所开处方药物的自付费用与其替代药物之间的差额。
对2020年5月至2021年7月间一家大学健康系统门诊诊所的处方进行回顾性分析。在解剖治疗化学(ATC)分类系统的第二级对处方进行分析。成本按30天供应量进行标准化。计算了第二级ATC水平上前20种药物类别的标准化成本、每张处方的总成本以及总体节约情况。RTPB的总体影响是根据选择RTPB建议的最便宜替代药物来估计的。
研究发现,22%的处方提供了RTPB信息,其中1.26%有建议的替代药物。在选择了替代药物的处方中,标准化平均成本节约为38.83美元。该研究实现了15416美元的患者总成本节约。如果为所有处方选择RTPB建议的最便宜替代药物,估计可节省276386美元。精神安定药和抗精神病药物是开出替代药物最多的,驱虫药和免疫刺激药物等专科药物节约最多。
该研究强调了RTPB在降低患者成本方面的重要性。它报告了在处方决策中使用RTPB实现的患者成本节约。未来的研究可以利用药房报销数据探索RTPB对药物依从性的影响。