• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Ethical Dilemma of Balancing Confidentiality and Duty to Protect: A Case Report of Comorbid Schizophrenia and Cannabis Use Disorder with Homicidal Thoughts.平衡保密义务与保护责任的伦理困境:一例合并精神分裂症和大麻使用障碍且伴有杀人念头的病例报告
Niger Med J. 2023 Jul 2;64(3):424-426. eCollection 2023 May-Jun.
2
Respecting the autonomy of chronic mentally ill women in decisions about contraception.尊重患有慢性精神疾病的女性在避孕决策方面的自主权。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1993 Jul;44(7):671-4. doi: 10.1176/ps.44.7.671.
3
The duty to warn/protect: issues in clinical practice.警告/保护的义务:临床实践中的问题。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1987;15(2):179-86.
4
When agreeing with the patient is not enough: a schizophrenic woman requests pregnancy termination.当仅取得患者同意并不够时:一位精神分裂症女性请求终止妊娠。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004 Nov-Dec;26(6):475-80. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2004.07.002.
5
Current analysis of the Tarasoff duty: an evolution towards the limitation of the duty to protect.当前对塔萨夫义务的分析:朝着限制保护义务的方向演变。
Behav Sci Law. 2001;19(3):325-43. doi: 10.1002/bsl.444.
6
The Tarasoff raid: a new extension of the duty to protect.塔萨罗夫案突袭:保护义务的新延伸
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1992;20(3):335-42.
7
Twenty years after Tarasoff: reviewing the duty to protect.塔拉索夫案二十年后:审视保护义务
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 1996 Jul-Aug;4(2):67-76. doi: 10.3109/10673229609030526.
8
Tarasoff duties in prisons: community standards with certain twists.监狱中的塔拉萨弗职责:带有某些扭曲的社区标准。
Psychiatr Q. 2010 Jun;81(2):177-82. doi: 10.1007/s11126-010-9127-1.
9
It's been a privilege: advising patients of the Tarasoff duty and its legal consequences for the federal psychotherapist-patient privilege.这是一种荣幸:向患者告知塔萨夫义务及其对联邦心理治疗师-患者特权的法律后果。
Fordham Law Rev. 2009 Nov;78(2):863-931.
10
The Tarasoff dilemma in criminal court.刑事法庭中的塔拉索夫困境。
J Forensic Sci. 1991 May;36(3):728-35.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethics and electronic health information technology.伦理与电子健康信息技术
Ghana Med J. 2011 Sep;45(3):87-8.
2
Non-disclosure of medical errors an egregious violation of ethical principles.隐瞒医疗差错是对伦理原则的严重违反。
Ghana Med J. 2009 Mar;43(1):34-9.
3
Don't Lie but Don't Tell the Whole Truth: The Therapeutic Privilege - Is it Ever Justified?不要说谎,但也不要说出全部真相:治疗特权——它是否有正当理由?
Ghana Med J. 2008 Dec;42(4):156-61.
4
Warning a potential victim of a person's dangerousness: clinician's duty or victim's right?警告潜在受害者某人具有危险性:是临床医生的职责还是受害者的权利?
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2006;34(3):338-48.
5
"Where the public peril begins". 25 years after Tarasoff.“公共危险始于何处”。塔拉索夫案25年后。
J Leg Med. 2000 Jun;21(2):187-222. doi: 10.1080/01947640050074698.

平衡保密义务与保护责任的伦理困境:一例合并精神分裂症和大麻使用障碍且伴有杀人念头的病例报告

The Ethical Dilemma of Balancing Confidentiality and Duty to Protect: A Case Report of Comorbid Schizophrenia and Cannabis Use Disorder with Homicidal Thoughts.

作者信息

Fiagbe Delali, Edwin Ama Kyerewaa, Dordoye Eugene K, Dellor Dzifa, Gyamera Adwoa, Dziwornu Emmanuel

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Ghana Medical School, University of Ghana, Ghana.

Department of Psychological Medicine and Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.

出版信息

Niger Med J. 2023 Jul 2;64(3):424-426. eCollection 2023 May-Jun.

PMID:38974070
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11223015/
Abstract

This is a report of a 29-year-old female with a history of Schizophrenia and Cannabis Use Disorder who presented with auditory hallucinations that asked her to kill her immediate supervisor. She presented the ethical dilemma many healthcare providers face in balancing the principles of patient confidentiality with the duty to protect and beneficence. The clinicians breached the patient's right to confidentiality to protect her supervisor by informing the supervisor, their manager, and the police. However, they also ensured her job security, which she risked in an environment where mental illness is highly stigmatized. This case highlights the importance of considering the ethical principles of disclosing confidential information, such as the Tarasoff I and II, and beneficence (as her job was protected) in making clinical decisions. It also summarizes the legal precedents established by the Tarasoff cases and the implications for clinical practice.

摘要

这是一份关于一名29岁女性的报告,她有精神分裂症和大麻使用障碍病史,出现了幻听,幻听要求她杀死自己的直属上司。她提出了许多医疗服务提供者在平衡患者保密原则与保护及行善义务时所面临的伦理困境。临床医生为了保护她的上司,违反了患者的保密权,告知了上司、他们的经理和警方。然而,他们也确保了她的工作安全,在精神疾病受到高度污名化的环境中,她原本面临着失去工作的风险。这个案例凸显了在做出临床决策时考虑披露机密信息的伦理原则(如塔萨夫I和II)以及行善原则(因为她的工作得到了保护)的重要性。它还总结了塔萨夫案件确立的法律先例以及对临床实践的影响。