• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

憩室出血患者住院结局的预测因素:对国家住院样本数据(2016 - 2020年)的回顾性分析

Predictors of in-hospital outcomes for diverticular bleeding patients: a retrospective analysis of National Inpatient Sample data (2016-2020).

作者信息

Patel Parth, Siraw Bekure B, Mehadi Abdulrahim Yusuf, Zaher Eli Adrian, Ebrahim Mohamed Ayman, Tafesse Yordanos T

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Ascension Saint Joseph Hospital, Chicago (Parth Patel, Bekure B. Siraw, Eli Adrian Zaher, Mohamed Ayman Ebrahim).

Department of Internal Medicine, John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County (Abdulrahim Yusuf Mehadi).

出版信息

Ann Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul-Aug;37(4):449-457. doi: 10.20524/aog.2024.0896. Epub 2024 Jun 14.

DOI:10.20524/aog.2024.0896
PMID:38974086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11226741/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diverticular bleeding is the leading cause of lower gastrointestinal bleeding, affecting 3-5% of patients with diverticulosis. Current management protocols include resuscitation, diagnosis via direct visualization, computed tomography imaging, endoscopic interventions, angioembolization, and surgery when needed. However, predictive factors for outcomes and optimal interventions remain ambiguous.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2016-2020) to determine predictors of adverse in-hospital outcomes in diverticular bleeding patients without perforation or abscess. Demographic and clinical data were extracted, and multivariate regression models were applied. Analysis was conducted using R statistical software (version 4.1.3), with significance set at P<0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 28,269 patients hospitalized for diverticular bleeding were identified. Age >85 years, moderate to severe Charlson Comorbidity Index, hypovolemic shock, blood transfusion requirement, and requirement for colectomy were significantly associated with greater in-hospital mortality. Factors such as late colonoscopy timing and colon resection led to longer hospital stays, while arterial embolization was predicted by older age, Black race, hypovolemic shock, and blood transfusion. Predictors of colon resection included advanced age, presence of colon cancer, and hypovolemic shock.

CONCLUSIONS

Our retrospective study identified significant predictors of in-hospital outcomes among patients with diverticular bleeding, informing risk stratification and management strategies. Further research is warranted to validate these findings and refine management algorithms for improved patient care. Integrating these insights into clinical practice may enhance outcomes and guide personalized interventions in diverticular bleeding management.

摘要

背景

憩室出血是下消化道出血的主要原因,影响3%至5%的憩室病患者。目前的管理方案包括复苏、通过直接可视化诊断、计算机断层扫描成像、内镜干预、血管栓塞以及必要时的手术。然而,结局的预测因素和最佳干预措施仍不明确。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究分析了国家住院患者样本(NIS)数据库(2016 - 2020年)中的数据,以确定无穿孔或脓肿的憩室出血患者院内不良结局的预测因素。提取了人口统计学和临床数据,并应用了多变量回归模型。使用R统计软件(版本4.1.3)进行分析,显著性设定为P<0.05。

结果

共识别出28269例因憩室出血住院的患者。年龄>85岁、中度至重度查尔森合并症指数、低血容量性休克、输血需求以及结肠切除术需求与更高的院内死亡率显著相关。结肠镜检查时间较晚和结肠切除等因素导致住院时间延长,而动脉栓塞的预测因素包括年龄较大、黑人种族、低血容量性休克和输血。结肠切除的预测因素包括高龄、结肠癌的存在以及低血容量性休克。

结论

我们的回顾性研究确定了憩室出血患者院内结局的重要预测因素,为风险分层和管理策略提供了依据。有必要进行进一步研究以验证这些发现并完善管理算法,以改善患者护理。将这些见解整合到临床实践中可能会改善结局,并指导憩室出血管理中的个性化干预。

相似文献

1
Predictors of in-hospital outcomes for diverticular bleeding patients: a retrospective analysis of National Inpatient Sample data (2016-2020).憩室出血患者住院结局的预测因素:对国家住院样本数据(2016 - 2020年)的回顾性分析
Ann Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul-Aug;37(4):449-457. doi: 10.20524/aog.2024.0896. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
2
Management of Diverticular Bleeding: Evaluation, Stabilization, Intervention, and Recurrence of Bleeding and Indications for Resection after Control of Bleeding.憩室出血的管理:评估、稳定病情、干预措施、出血复发以及出血控制后手术切除的指征
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2018 Jul;31(4):243-250. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1607963. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
3
[Diverticular bleeding. Diagnostics, non-surgical treatment, indications for surgery].[憩室出血。诊断、非手术治疗及手术指征]
Chirurg. 2014 Apr;85(4):314-9. doi: 10.1007/s00104-013-2622-9.
4
Risk factors for adverse in-hospital outcomes in acute colonic diverticular hemorrhage.急性结肠憩室出血患者院内不良结局的危险因素
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct 7;21(37):10697-703. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i37.10697.
5
Predictors of 90-day Colonic Diverticular Recurrent Bleeding and Readmission.90天结肠憩室复发性出血及再入院的预测因素
Intern Med. 2019 Aug 15;58(16):2277-2282. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.2276-18. Epub 2019 May 22.
6
Urgent colonoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of severe diverticular hemorrhage.紧急结肠镜检查用于严重憩室出血的诊断和治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Jan 13;342(2):78-82. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200001133420202.
7
Effectiveness of endoscopic hemostasis in preventing diverticular bleeding with extravasation detected by contrast-enhanced computed tomography: A single-center retrospective cohort study.对比增强 CT 检测到外渗的情况下,内镜止血预防憩室出血的有效性:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Feb 26;100(8):e24736. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024736.
8
Early Colonoscopy for Diverticular Bleeding Does Not Reduce Risk of Postdischarge Recurrent Bleeding: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.早期结肠镜检查对憩室出血并无降低出院后再出血风险的作用:倾向评分匹配分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May;17(6):1105-1111.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.09.050. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
9
Colonoscopy with clipping is useful in the diagnosis and treatment of diverticular bleeding.结直肠镜夹闭术在憩室出血的诊断和治疗中具有重要价值。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Feb;10(2):131-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.10.029. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
10
Diverticular hemorrhage in the elderly--is it well tolerated?老年人憩室出血——耐受性良好吗?
Dis Colon Rectum. 1996 Feb;39(2):191-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02068074.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of Colonic Diverticular Disease in the Older Adult.老年患者结肠憩室病的管理
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2025 Jun 21;27(1):42. doi: 10.1007/s11894-025-00986-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Colonic diverticular bleeding: An update on pathogenesis and management.结肠憩室出血:发病机制和治疗的最新进展。
Dis Mon. 2023 Nov;69(11):101543. doi: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2023.101543. Epub 2023 Mar 12.
2
Artificial intelligence in healthcare: transforming the practice of medicine.医疗保健领域的人工智能:变革医学实践。
Future Healthc J. 2021 Jul;8(2):e188-e194. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2021-0095.
3
Risk factors of interventional radiology/surgery for colonic diverticular bleeding.结肠憩室出血介入放射学/手术的危险因素。
JGH Open. 2021 Jan 27;5(3):343-349. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12499. eCollection 2021 Mar.
4
Factors associated with diverticular bleeding and re-bleeding: A United States hospital study.与憩室出血及再出血相关的因素:一项美国医院研究。
North Clin Istanb. 2018 Sep 5;6(3):248-253. doi: 10.14744/nci.2018.23540. eCollection 2019.
5
Epidemiology of colonic diverticula and recent advances in the management of colonic diverticular bleeding.结肠憩室病的流行病学和结肠憩室出血的最新治疗进展。
Dig Endosc. 2020 Jan;32(2):240-250. doi: 10.1111/den.13547. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
6
The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare.人工智能在医疗保健领域的潜力。
Future Healthc J. 2019 Jun;6(2):94-98. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94.
7
Colonic diverticular bleeding and predictors of the length of hospitalization: An observational study.结肠憩室出血及住院时间的预测因素:一项观察性研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug;34(8):1351-1356. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14603. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
8
Middle-term mortality and re-bleeding after initial diverticular bleeding: A nationwide study of 365 mostly elderly French patients.初次憩室出血后的中期死亡率和再出血情况:一项针对365名大多为老年法国患者的全国性研究。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Feb;5(1):119-127. doi: 10.1177/2050640616647816. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
9
Urgent colonoscopy in patients with lower GI bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.紧急结肠镜检查在胃肠道下出血患者中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jul;86(1):107-117.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.01.035. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
10
ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Patients With Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.美国胃肠病学会临床指南:急性下消化道出血患者的管理
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr;111(4):459-74. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.41. Epub 2016 Mar 1.