Amano Alexis, Menon Nikitha K, Bissonnette Stephanie, Sullivan Amy B, Frost Natasha, Mekile Zariah, Wang Hanhan, Shanafelt Tait D, Trockel Mickey T
Department of Health Policy and Management, Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
WellMD & WellPhD Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2024 Jun 12;8(4):329-342. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.04.005. eCollection 2024 Aug.
To identify the characteristics that distinguish occupationally well outliers (OWO), a subset of academic psychiatrists and neurologists with consistently high professional fulfillment and low burnout, from their counterparts with lower levels of occupational well-being.
Participants included faculty physicians practicing psychiatry and neurology in academic medical centers affiliated with the Professional Well-being Academic Consortium. In this prospective, longitudinal study, a mixed qualitative and quantitative approach was used. Quantitative measures were administered to physicians in a longitudinal occupational well-being survey sponsored by the academic organizations where they work. Four organizations participated in the qualitative study. Psychiatrists and neurologists at these organizations who competed survey measures at 2 consecutive time points between 2019 and 2021 were invited to participate in an interview.
Of 410 (213 psychiatrists and 197 neurologists) who completed professional fulfillment and burnout measures at 2 time points, 84 (20.5%) met OWO criteria. Occupationally well outliers psychiatrists and neurologists had more favorable scores on hypothesized determinants of well-being (values alignment, perceived gratitude, supportive leadership, peer support, and control of schedule). Ultimately, 31 psychiatrists (25% of 124 invited) and 33 neurologists (18.5% of 178 invited) agreed to participate in an interview. Qualitatively, OWO physicians differed from all others in 3 thematic domains: development of life grounded in priorities, ability to shape day-to-day work context, and professional relationships that provide joy and support.
A multilevel approach is necessary to promote optimal occupational well-being, targeting individual-level factors, organizational-level factors, and broader system-level factors.
识别职业幸福感高的杰出人士(OWO)的特征,OWO是学术精神病学家和神经学家的一个子集,他们始终具有较高的职业成就感且倦怠程度较低,并将他们与职业幸福感较低的同行进行区分。
参与者包括在专业幸福感学术联盟附属的学术医疗中心从事精神病学和神经学工作的教职医生。在这项前瞻性纵向研究中,采用了定性与定量相结合的方法。定量测量通过他们工作的学术组织发起的纵向职业幸福感调查对医生进行。四个组织参与了定性研究。邀请了这些组织中在2019年至2021年期间连续两个时间点完成调查测量的精神病学家和神经学家参加访谈。
在410名(213名精神病学家和197名神经学家)在两个时间点完成职业成就感和倦怠测量的人中,84人(20.5%)符合OWO标准。职业幸福感高的杰出精神病学家和神经学家在幸福感的假设决定因素(价值观一致、感知到的感恩、支持性领导、同伴支持和日程安排控制权)方面得分更高。最终,31名精神病学家(受邀的124人的25%)和33名神经学家(受邀的178人的18.5%)同意参加访谈。在定性方面,OWO医生在三个主题领域与其他所有人不同:基于优先事项的生活发展、塑造日常工作环境的能力以及提供快乐和支持的职业关系。
促进最佳职业幸福感需要采取多层次方法,针对个人层面因素、组织层面因素和更广泛的系统层面因素。