Department of Translational Medicine and for Romagna University of Ferrara, Via Luigi Borsari 46, Ferrara 44121, Italy.
Associazione Sammarinese di Geriatria e Gerontologia (ASGG), Dogana, San Marino.
Mediators Inflamm. 2024 Jun 30;2024:6640130. doi: 10.1155/2024/6640130. eCollection 2024.
Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a noninvasive, inexpensive, and easily applicable marker of inflammation. Since immune dysregulation leading to inflammation is regarded as a hallmark of dementia, in particular Alzheimer's disease (AD), we decided to investigate the potentials of NLR as a diagnostic and predictive biomarker in this clinical setting.
NLR was measured in the blood of patients with AD ( = 103), amnestic type mild cognitive impairment (aMCI, = 212), vascular dementia (VAD, = 34), and cognitively healthy Controls ( = 61). One hundred twelve MCI patients underwent a regular clinical follow-up. Over a 36-months median follow-up, 80 remained stable, while 32 progressed to overt dementia.
NLR was higher in patients with aMCI or dementia compared to Controls; however, the difference was statistically significant only for aMCI (+13%, =0.04) and AD (+20%, =0.03). These results were confirmed by multivariate logistic analysis, which showed that high NLR was associated with an increase in the likelihood of receiving a diagnosis of aMCI (odd ratio (OR): 2.58, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.36-4.89) or AD (OR: 3.13, 95%CI: 1.47-6.70), but not of VAD. NLR did not differ when comparing stable vs. progressing aMCI.
This is the first report showing that NLR is significantly increased in MCI and AD but not in VAD. We also found that NLR was unable to predict the conversion from aMCI to AD. Further research on larger cohorts is warranted to definitely ascertain the application of NLR as a possible marker for aMCI and AD.
中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)是一种非侵入性、廉价且易于应用的炎症标志物。由于导致炎症的免疫失调被认为是痴呆症的一个标志,特别是阿尔茨海默病(AD),我们决定研究 NLR 在这种临床环境下作为诊断和预测生物标志物的潜力。
我们测量了 AD 患者(n=103)、遗忘型轻度认知障碍(aMCI,n=212)、血管性痴呆(VAD,n=34)和认知健康对照者(n=61)的血液 NLR。112 名 MCI 患者接受了常规临床随访。在中位数为 36 个月的随访中,80 名患者病情稳定,而 32 名患者进展为明显痴呆。
与对照组相比,aMCI 或痴呆患者的 NLR 较高;然而,仅在 aMCI(+13%,p=0.04)和 AD(+20%,p=0.03)中差异具有统计学意义。多变量逻辑分析证实了这些结果,该分析表明,高 NLR 与 aMCI(优势比(OR):2.58,95%置信区间(CI):1.36-4.89)或 AD(OR:3.13,95%CI:1.47-6.70)诊断的可能性增加相关,但与 VAD 无关。稳定的 aMCI 与进展性 aMCI 相比,NLR 没有差异。
这是第一项表明 NLR 在 MCI 和 AD 中显著增加而在 VAD 中没有增加的报告。我们还发现,NLR 无法预测从 aMCI 到 AD 的转化。需要对更大的队列进行进一步研究,以确定 NLR 作为 aMCI 和 AD 可能标志物的应用。