• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妇产科形成性评估中单项最佳答案型多项选择题的项目分析

Item Analysis of Single Best Response Type Multiple Choice Questions for Formative Assessment in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

作者信息

Kulshreshtha Shabdika, Gupta Ganesh, Goyal Gourav, Gupta Kalika, Davda Kush

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan India.

Department of Anaesthesiology, Pacific Medical College and Hospital, Bhilo Ka Bedla, Udaipur, Rajasthan India.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2024 Jun;74(3):256-264. doi: 10.1007/s13224-023-01904-2. Epub 2024 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1007/s13224-023-01904-2
PMID:38974743
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11224199/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

MCQs (multiple choice questions) can be used to assess higher-order skills and be utilised for creating a question bank.

PURPOSE OF STUDY AIM

To perform post-validation item analysis of MCQs constructed by medical faculty for formative assessment of final-year medical students and to explore the association between difficulty index ( value) and discrimination indices (DI) with distractor efficiency (DE).

METHODS

An observational study was conducted involving 50 final-year MBBS students and 10 faculty members for a period of one year (October 2020 to September 2021). After training the faculty in item analysis, a MCQ test was prepared after collecting the peer-reviewed 25 MCQs (five each from various subtopics of the subject). The result of this test was used to calculate the FV (facility value), DI (discrimination index), and DE (distractor efficiency) of each item. Student and faculty feedback was also obtained on a five-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

The mean FV was 46.3 ± 19.3 and 64% of questions were difficult; the mean DI was 0.3 ± 0.1 and 92% of questions could differentiate between HAG (high achiever's group) and LAG (low achiever's group); the mean DE was 82% ± 19.8 and 48% of items had no NFDs (non-functional distractors).

CONCLUSION

MCQs can be used to assess all the levels of Bloom's taxonomy. Item analysis yielded 23 out of 25 MCQs that were suitable for the question bank.

摘要

背景

多项选择题(MCQs)可用于评估高阶技能,并用于创建题库。

研究目的

对医学教师为医学专业最后一年学生的形成性评估所构建的多项选择题进行效度验证后的项目分析,并探讨难度指数(值)和区分指数(DI)与干扰项效率(DE)之间的关联。

方法

进行了一项观察性研究,涉及50名医学专业最后一年的学生和10名教师,为期一年(2020年10月至2021年9月)。在对教师进行项目分析培训后,收集经过同行评审的25道多项选择题(该学科各子主题各5道)后编制了一份多项选择题测试。该测试结果用于计算每个项目的FV(难易度值)、DI(区分指数)和DE(干扰项效率)。还通过五点李克特量表获得了学生和教师的反馈。

结果

平均FV为46.3±19.3,64%的问题较难;平均DI为0.3±0.1,92%的问题能够区分高分组(HAG)和低分组(LAG);平均DE为82%±19.8,48%的项目没有无功能干扰项(NFDs)。

结论

多项选择题可用于评估布鲁姆分类法的所有层次。项目分析得出25道多项选择题中有23道适合纳入题库。

相似文献

1
Item Analysis of Single Best Response Type Multiple Choice Questions for Formative Assessment in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.妇产科形成性评估中单项最佳答案型多项选择题的项目分析
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2024 Jun;74(3):256-264. doi: 10.1007/s13224-023-01904-2. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
2
Item and Test Analysis to Identify Quality Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) from an Assessment of Medical Students of Ahmedabad, Gujarat.来自古吉拉特邦艾哈迈达巴德市医学生评估的题目及测试分析,以识别高质量的多项选择题(MCQs)
Indian J Community Med. 2014 Jan;39(1):17-20. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.126347.
3
Writing Multiple Choice Questions-Has the Student Become the Master?编写多项选择题——学生是否已经成为主人?
Teach Learn Med. 2023 Jun-Jul;35(3):356-367. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2050240. Epub 2022 May 1.
4
Evaluation of Multiple-Choice Questions by Item Analysis, from an Online Internal Assessment of 6 Semester Medical Students in a Rural Medical College, West Bengal.通过项目分析评估多项选择题,来自西孟加拉邦一所农村医学院对6年制医学生的在线内部评估。
Indian J Community Med. 2022 Jan-Mar;47(1):92-95. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_1156_21. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
5
Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study.纵向教师发展计划对多项选择题编写技能的有效性:一项随访研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 10;12(10):e0185895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185895. eCollection 2017.
6
Item analysis of multiple choice questions: A quality assurance test for an assessment tool.多项选择题的项目分析:一种评估工具的质量保证测试。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2021 Feb;77(Suppl 1):S85-S89. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.11.007. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
7
Assessment of the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions in the Surgery Course for an Integrated Curriculum, University of Bisha College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯比沙大学医学院综合课程外科学课程中多项选择题质量评估
Cureus. 2023 Dec 13;15(12):e50441. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50441. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Item analysis and optimizing multiple-choice questions for a viable question bank in ophthalmology: A cross-sectional study.眼科可行题库中多项选择题的项目分析与优化:一项横断面研究。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb;69(2):343-346. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1610_20.
9
Item Analysis of Multiple-Choice Question (MCQ)-Based Exam Efficiency Among Postgraduate Pediatric Medical Students: An Observational, Cross-Sectional Study From Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯研究生儿科医学生基于多项选择题考试效率的项目分析:一项观察性横断面研究
Cureus. 2024 Sep 11;16(9):e69151. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69151. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
A comparison of clinical-scenario (case cluster) versus stand-alone multiple choice questions in a problem-based learning environment in undergraduate medicine.本科医学基于问题的学习环境中临床情景(病例组)与独立多项选择题的比较。
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2016 Nov 11;12(1):14-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2016.08.014. eCollection 2017 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Item analysis of multiple choice questions: A quality assurance test for an assessment tool.多项选择题的项目分析:一种评估工具的质量保证测试。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2021 Feb;77(Suppl 1):S85-S89. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.11.007. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
2
Item analysis of in use multiple choice questions in pharmacology.药理学中正在使用的多项选择题的项目分析
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2016 Jul-Sep;6(3):170-3. doi: 10.4103/2229-516X.186965.
3
Item and Test Analysis to Identify Quality Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) from an Assessment of Medical Students of Ahmedabad, Gujarat.来自古吉拉特邦艾哈迈达巴德市医学生评估的题目及测试分析,以识别高质量的多项选择题(MCQs)
Indian J Community Med. 2014 Jan;39(1):17-20. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.126347.
4
Relationship between item difficulty and discrimination indices in true/false-type multiple choice questions of a para-clinical multidisciplinary paper.辅助临床多学科试卷中是非型选择题的题目难度与区分度指标之间的关系
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2006 Feb;35(2):67-71.
5
Set a multiple choice question (MCQ) examination.设置一道多项选择题考试。
BMJ. 1991 Mar 30;302(6779):780-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6779.780.
6
An investigation of three types of multiple choice questions.对三种多项选择题的调查。
Annu Conf Res Med Educ. 1977;16:111-6.