Suppr超能文献

沙特阿拉伯研究生儿科医学生基于多项选择题考试效率的项目分析:一项观察性横断面研究

Item Analysis of Multiple-Choice Question (MCQ)-Based Exam Efficiency Among Postgraduate Pediatric Medical Students: An Observational, Cross-Sectional Study From Saudi Arabia.

作者信息

Shahat Khaled A

机构信息

Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Alrayan National College of Medicine, Madinah, SAU.

Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, College of Medicine, Taibah University, Madinah, SAU.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Sep 11;16(9):e69151. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69151. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several modalities of written examination have been employed in medical education, with multiple-choice questions (MCQs) being the most frequently used and preferred format. This underlines the need to regularly assess and monitor the quality of MCQs in medical exams. Such assessment of MCQs helps to ensure that these exams are well‑designed and adequately powered to evaluate students' performance. Hence, the current study assessed the efficiency of an MCQ-based examination, in a cohort of pediatric post-graduate students in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

This observational, cross-sectional study examined the efficiency of MCQs in terms of their validity, reliability, difficulty index (DFI), discrimination index (DI), and distractor efficiency (DE). The exam consisted of a total of 48 MCQs, 144 distractors, a total score of 48, and no negative marking.

RESULTS

The reliability index of 0.76 showed the consistency and reproducibility of the exam results. The exam had a DFI of 69.77%, indicating an overall moderate level of difficulty. The exam had a balanced mix of 23 easy (47.9%), 20 (41.7%) moderately difficult, and five (10.4%) tough questions. Twenty (41.6%) items had a DI of ≥0.3, indicating good discrimination of high and low performers, while the remaining 28 MCQs (58.3%) had a lower DI of ≤0.19, implying poor discriminative ability. The DE was 81.25%, indicating that the majority of distractors in the exam were functional.

CONCLUSION

To the best of the author's knowledge, this is the first study among post-graduate pediatric students from Saudi Arabia, to present the results of item analysis of an MCQ-based exam. The study highlights the importance of optimizing the quality of MCQs by following established guidelines, to make MCQ-based clinical assessments more effective. It reiterates the importance of a reasonable DFI well aligned with students' knowledge levels, maximum distractor functionality, and an impactful DI, in developing high-quality MCQs.

摘要

背景

医学教育中采用了多种笔试方式,其中多项选择题(MCQ)是最常用且最受欢迎的形式。这凸显了定期评估和监测医学考试中多项选择题质量的必要性。对多项选择题的此类评估有助于确保这些考试设计良好且有足够的效力来评估学生的表现。因此,本研究评估了沙特阿拉伯一组儿科研究生基于多项选择题考试的效率。

方法

这项观察性横断面研究从效度、信度、难度指数(DFI)、区分指数(DI)和干扰项效率(DE)方面考察了多项选择题的效率。该考试共有48道多项选择题、144个干扰项,总分48分,无倒扣分。

结果

信度指数为0.76,表明考试结果具有一致性和可重复性。该考试的难度指数为69.77%,表明总体难度适中。该考试题目分布均衡,23道简单题(47.9%)、20道中等难度题(41.7%)和5道难题(10.4%)。20道题(41.6%)的区分指数≥0.3,表明对高分和低分考生有良好的区分度,而其余28道多项选择题(58.3%)的区分指数≤0.19,意味着区分能力较差。干扰项效率为81.25%,表明考试中的大多数干扰项起了作用。

结论

据作者所知,这是沙特阿拉伯儿科研究生中第一项呈现基于多项选择题考试的题目分析结果的研究。该研究强调了遵循既定指南优化多项选择题质量的重要性,以使基于多项选择题的临床评估更有效。它重申了在开发高质量多项选择题时,与学生知识水平相匹配的合理难度指数、最大干扰项功能和有效的区分指数的重要性。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Faculty perceptions on one-best MCQ development.教师对最佳单项选择题开发的看法。
Clin Teach. 2023 Feb;20(1):e13529. doi: 10.1111/tct.13529. Epub 2022 Sep 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验