• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮肤点刺针的形状和施加的重量对皮肤点刺试验中的风团大小有至关重要的影响。

The shape of and applied weight on skin prick lancets critically affect the wheal size in the skin prick test.

作者信息

Bartko Ewa Anna, Elberling Jesper, Mosbech Holger

机构信息

Gentofte Hospital, Skin and Allergy Department, Allergy Clinic, Hellerup, Denmark.

出版信息

World Allergy Organ J. 2024 Jun 13;17(6):100915. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100915. eCollection 2024 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100915
PMID:38974945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11225002/
Abstract

The global application of the skin prick test (SPT) is attributed to the low costs, easy execution, and approach. Still, the healthcare professionals' technique and the lancet shape may challenge the standardization of the method. Thus, we investigated the influence of the shape of the lancet and the applied weight on the wheal size of SPT. Two allergic and one non-allergic individual were tested with allergens ( and ) and histamine solution (positive control), respectively. Horizontally (HS) and diagonally (DS) shouldered lancets with the same tip length (1 mm) were tested under two different conditions: either 60 g or 120 g weight pressure. The wheal size induced by the 4 different combinations was measured. The higher-weight device (120 g) induced a significantly larger and less variable wheal response with the tested allergens and histamine. However, the shape of the lancet affected the wheal size more than the applied weight. The least variable response was measured to histamine for the horizontal-shouldered lancet combined with the higher weight, whereas the same lancet with the lower weight resulted in a significant number of false negative results.

摘要

皮肤点刺试验(SPT)在全球范围内的应用归因于其成本低、操作简便以及[此处原文缺失相关内容]。然而,医护人员的技术以及采血针的形状可能会对该方法的标准化提出挑战。因此,我们研究了采血针形状和施加的重量对皮肤点刺试验风团大小的影响。分别对两名过敏个体和一名非过敏个体进行变应原([此处原文缺失相关内容])和组胺溶液(阳性对照)测试。在两种不同条件下测试了尖端长度相同(1毫米)的水平肩部(HS)和对角肩部(DS)采血针:重量压力分别为60克或120克。测量了由4种不同组合引起的风团大小。较重重量的装置(120克)在用测试的变应原和组胺测试时,引起的风团反应明显更大且变异性更小。然而,采血针的形状对风团大小的影响大于施加的重量。对于水平肩部采血针与较重重量相结合的情况,对组胺的反应变异性最小,而相同的采血针与较轻重量相结合则导致大量假阴性结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c65/11225002/25502f64db0c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c65/11225002/a287c39093ae/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c65/11225002/25502f64db0c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c65/11225002/a287c39093ae/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c65/11225002/25502f64db0c/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
The shape of and applied weight on skin prick lancets critically affect the wheal size in the skin prick test.皮肤点刺针的形状和施加的重量对皮肤点刺试验中的风团大小有至关重要的影响。
World Allergy Organ J. 2024 Jun 13;17(6):100915. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100915. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
The Lancet Weight Determines Wheal Diameter in Response to Skin Prick Testing with Histamine.柳叶刀重量决定了对组胺进行皮肤点刺试验时的风团直径。
PLoS One. 2016 May 23;11(5):e0156211. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156211. eCollection 2016.
3
[Comparative study of 3 types of lancets for performing prick tests].[用于进行点刺试验的3种采血针的比较研究]
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1996 Mar-Apr;24(2):58-64.
4
[COMPARISON OF WHEAL SIZE INDUCED BY BIFURCATED NEEDLE AND SMARTPRACTICE PRICK LANCET].[分叉针与 SmartPractice 采血针所致风团大小的比较]
Arerugi. 2022;71(5):389-396. doi: 10.15036/arerugi.71.389.
5
[Skin reactivity in the histamine-equivalent skin test in hypersensitivity to grass pollen].[草花粉过敏患者组胺等效皮肤试验中的皮肤反应性]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2000 May-Jun;128(5-6):194-9.
6
[Comparison of two lancets in the skin prick test].[两种采血针用于皮肤点刺试验的比较]
Rev Alerg Mex. 2005 Sep-Oct;52(5):188-93.
7
[The comparison of reactions in skin prick test performed with the standardized lancet and the injection needle].[使用标准化采血针和注射针进行皮肤点刺试验时反应的比较]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2008 Jun;24(144):495-501.
8
Comparison of different diagnostic products for skin prick testing.用于皮肤点刺试验的不同诊断产品的比较。
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Feb;41(1):23-31.
9
The results of skin prick testing in patients with allergic rhinitis: a comparison between a multiple lancet device and a single lancet.变应性鼻炎患者皮肤点刺试验结果:多针 lancet 装置与单针 lancet 的比较
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2004 Jun-Sep;22(2-3):109-14.
10
Impaired resolution of wheals in the skin prick test and low diamine oxidase blood level in allergic patients.过敏性患者皮肤点刺试验中风团消退受损及血中二胺氧化酶水平降低。
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2019 Oct;36(5):538-543. doi: 10.5114/ada.2019.89504. Epub 2019 Nov 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Skin Prick Automated Test device offers more reliable allergy test results compared to a manual skin prick test.皮肤点刺自动化测试设备相较于手动皮肤点刺测试,能够提供更可靠的过敏测试结果。
Rhinology. 2024 Apr 1;62(2):216-222. doi: 10.4193/Rhin23.330.
2
Fine-tuning the use of a skin prick test device.微调皮肤点刺试验装置的使用方法。
World Allergy Organ J. 2020 May 8;13(5):100122. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100122. eCollection 2020 May.
3
Current practice of allergy diagnosis and the potential impact of regulation in Europe.当前欧洲的过敏诊断实践及监管的潜在影响。
Allergy. 2018 Feb;73(2):323-327. doi: 10.1111/all.13306. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
4
The Lancet Weight Determines Wheal Diameter in Response to Skin Prick Testing with Histamine.柳叶刀重量决定了对组胺进行皮肤点刺试验时的风团直径。
PLoS One. 2016 May 23;11(5):e0156211. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156211. eCollection 2016.
5
The skin prick test - European standards.皮肤点刺试验 - 欧洲标准。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2013 Feb 1;3(1):3. doi: 10.1186/2045-7022-3-3.
6
Comparison of five techniques of skin prick tests used routinely in Europe.比较欧洲常规使用的五种皮肤点刺试验技术。
Allergy. 2011 Nov;66(11):1415-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02679.x. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
7
The impact of age on prevalence of positive skin prick tests and specific IgE tests.年龄对皮肤点刺试验和特异性 IgE 试验阳性率的影响。
Respir Med. 2011 May;105(5):651-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.12.014. Epub 2011 Jan 8.
8
Comparison of test devices for skin prick testing.用于皮肤点刺试验的测试设备比较。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Aug;116(2):341-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.03.035.
9
A comparison of six epicutaneous devices in the performance of immediate hypersensitivity skin testing.六种表皮装置在速发型超敏反应皮肤试验中的性能比较。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1989 Aug;84(2):168-74. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(89)90321-7.