Tal H, Panno J M, Vaidyanathan T K
J Periodontol. 1985 Sep;56(9):532-6. doi: 10.1902/jop.1985.56.9.532.
Root planing relies upon the quality of instrument cutting edges. This study evaluated the sharpness and wear of some dental curettes available in the market following standardized root planing procedures. Nine working edges of nine Gracey No. 1/2 DE curettes, three each from three different manufacturers, were used as controls. These unused factory-sharpened edges were examined by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Eighteen edges of nine curettes of the same brands were likewise examined after root planing procedures. Root planing was carried out on extracted one-rooted teeth mounted in natural positions in manikin jaws. Working areas measuring 3 X 5 mm were marked on root surfaces previously exposed by periodontitis. Root planing procedures included 15 vertical strokes done by either Side 1 or Side 2 of each instrument in relation to a single working area of a tooth, and the same procedure repeated 3 times using the opposite side of the curette. All working edges were examined at points 1 and 2 mm from the tip under 500 times magnification. Edge deformation increased significantly from the control group to the "15-stroke" group and from the "15-stroke" group to the "45-stroke" group. Factory-sharpened curettes (control) were sharp, with functional wire edges present on 55% of the specimens. After 15 strokes, nonfunctional wire edges and narrow edge deformations with bevels measuring less than 15 mu were present. After 45 strokes eight cutting edges (88.9%) showed bevels wider than 15 mu. The difference between the three brands was not significant in any group (i.e., controls, 15 strokes, 45 strokes). Further study is indicated to evaluate the relationships between bevel dimensions and root planing effectiveness.
根面平整术依赖于器械切割刃的质量。本研究按照标准化的根面平整程序,评估了市场上一些牙科刮治器的锋利度和磨损情况。选用9支格雷斯1/2号双动龈下刮治器的9个工作刃作为对照,这9个工作刃分别来自三个不同的制造商,每个制造商提供3个。这些未经使用的工厂锐化刃通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)进行检查。同样对9支相同品牌刮治器的18个刃在根面平整程序后进行检查。根面平整操作在安装于人体模型颌骨自然位置的单根离体牙上进行。在先前因牙周炎暴露的根面上标记出3×5毫米的工作区域。根面平整程序包括使用每支器械的1面或2面,相对于牙齿的单个工作区域进行15次垂直刮划,然后使用刮治器的另一侧重复相同程序3次。所有工作刃在距尖端1毫米和2毫米处,于500倍放大倍数下进行检查。从对照组到“15次刮划”组,再从“15次刮划”组到“45次刮划”组,刃口变形显著增加。工厂锐化的刮治器(对照组)很锋利,55%的标本上存在功能性丝状边缘。15次刮划后,出现了非功能性丝状边缘和小于15微米的窄斜面边缘变形。45次刮划后,8个切削刃(88.9%)的斜面宽度超过15微米。在任何一组(即对照组、15次刮划组、45次刮划组)中,三个品牌之间的差异均不显著。需要进一步研究以评估斜面尺寸与根面平整效果之间的关系。