Patil Vishal S, Shevate Ishan, Pervez Faiz R, Bhakare Dattatray
Orthopaedics, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune (Deemed to Be University), Pune, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Jun 6;16(6):e61778. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61778. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Total hip replacement (THR) for osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis yields better outcomes than THR for patients with neglected acetabular fractures. The inferior clinical results mostly arise from an unforeseen bone deficit, making the treatment more time-consuming and complex for instances requiring acetabular restoration and bone grafting. There is a lack of research on the clinical results of THR in cases where acetabular fractures have been overlooked. A 55-year-old male patient presented with a malunited anterior column of the acetabulum, non-union of the posterior column with protrusion, and a significant impaction fracture in the femoral head. He was then treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of acetabular columns, along with the use of a reconstruction cage and bone grafting. At the five-year follow-up, the patient had a good outcome. The keys to success include meticulous preoperative planning using radiography and computed tomography (CT) scans, sufficient exposure to define the fracture pattern, and the availability of a full range of devices and backup implants. If there are any prior implants, they should only be removed if they are infected or in the way of cup implantation. However, if there is a significant amount of bone loss, complex fractures may require extensive repair using revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) implants.
对于骨关节炎或炎性关节炎患者,全髋关节置换术(THR)的效果优于治疗被忽视的髋臼骨折患者的全髋关节置换术。较差的临床结果主要源于意外的骨缺损,这使得在需要髋臼修复和植骨的情况下,治疗更加耗时且复杂。对于髋臼骨折被忽视的病例,全髋关节置换术的临床结果缺乏研究。一名55岁男性患者,髋臼前柱畸形愈合,后柱不愈合伴后凸,股骨头有明显的嵌插骨折。随后对其进行了髋臼柱切开复位内固定术(ORIF),并使用了重建笼和植骨。在五年随访时,患者预后良好。成功的关键包括使用X线摄影和计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描进行细致的术前规划,充分暴露以确定骨折类型,以及具备全系列的器械和备用植入物。如果有先前的植入物,只有在感染或妨碍髋臼杯植入时才应取出。然而,如果有大量骨丢失,复杂骨折可能需要使用翻修全髋关节置换术(THA)植入物进行广泛修复。